11:13 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020605060407070503090903
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi all,
now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a near
future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM
virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux VM by
ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?
--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
blanchet(a)abes.fr
--------------020605060407070503090903
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1">Hi all,<br>
<br>
now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a
near future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the
KVM virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux
VM by ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?<br>
</font>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:blanchet@abes.fr">blanchet@abes.fr</a> </pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------020605060407070503090903--
11:35 p.m.
Am 24.06.2014 15:13, schrieb Nathanaël Blanchet:
Hi all,
now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a near
future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM
virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux VM by
ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?
very good question, can't wait to read an answer!
+1 from here.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
3:16 a.m.
Never seen an update to this ticket. Are there any plans?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Sven Kieske <S.Kieske(a)mittwald.de> wrote:
Am 24.06.2014 15:13, schrieb Nathanaël Blanchet:
> Hi all,
>
> now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a near
> future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM
> virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux VM by
> ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?
very good question, can't wait to read an answer!
+1 from here.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Johan Kooijman
4:51 p.m.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:16:06PM +0200, Johan Kooijman wrote:
Never seen an update to this ticket. Are there any plans?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Sven Kieske <S.Kieske(a)mittwald.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.06.2014 15:13, schrieb Nathanaël Blanchet:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a near
> > future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM
> > virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux VM by
> > ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?
>
> very good question, can't wait to read an answer!
> +1 from here.
I'm not aware of current plans. We can consider this when ovirt-4.0
feature request season opens.
Until then, can you share your own use case for runnig LXC?
I'd love to see a vdsm hook that translates the qemu-kvm domxml into an
lxc one, as a first step. Anyone?
Dan.
10:15 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:16:06PM +0200, Johan Kooijman wrote:
> Never seen an update to this ticket. Are there any plans?
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Sven Kieske <S.Kieske(a)mittwald.de>
wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 24.06.2014 15:13, schrieb Nathanaël Blanchet:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > now rhel7 is out, it will become a part of the ovirt project in a
near
> > > future. Given taht official LXC support aims to complete the KVM
> > > virtualization part, is LXC planned to be supported for linux VM by
> > > ovirt, like openvz is with proxmox?
> >
> > very good question, can't wait to read an answer!
> > +1 from here.
I'm not aware of current plans. We can consider this when ovirt-4.0
feature request season opens.
Until then, can you share your own use case for runnig LXC?
It seems like Proxmox have quite the install base especially due to the
ability to mix containers and "fat" VMs. AFAIK that's the only feature they
have that is ahead of oVirt. And that install base should tell us this is
indeed a feature needed and widely used.
I'd love to see a vdsm hook that translates the qemu-kvm domxml into an
lxc one, as a first step. Anyone?
That can be a fun project to do, but I'm not volunteering just yet ;)
Dan.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
2:10 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Until then, can you share your own use case for runnig LXC?
One use case that recently came up in discussion is in a build farm.
Lightweight containers with the possibility to use AUFS and RAM disks make
for fast, isolated compiles, and they also seem great for automated
testing. Having all of that managed with the same as more long-lived,
traditional VMs is appealing. (Whether doing that in the same cluster as
those longer-lived VMs is wise is a much more context-specific question.)
I can see similar arguments for lots other typical network services where a
fully virtualized VM is unnecessary overhead (there's no need for full
isolation or different OSes), but the logical isolation is valuable.
-j
--
jlawrence(a)squaretrade.com
3279
days inactive
3762
days old
5 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Dan Yasny -
Jamie Lawrence -
Johan Kooijman -
Nathanaël Blanchet -
Sven Kieske