ovirtmgmt manual bridge cannot be used in ovirt 4.0
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
Hi All, In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nic's I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui. On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach. In the engine logs i get among other things 'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. ' the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way. On the host vdsm.log i get limited info, when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way. Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed? If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past. Thanks.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com> wrote:
What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com> wrote:
What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() > Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am dealing with loads of systems. in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment. Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [8]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com [7]> wrote:
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [6]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl [3]> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nics
Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually.
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence >> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [4] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
Links: ------ [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up) On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am dealing with loads of systems. in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [8]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
<ckozleriii@gmail.com [7]> wrote:
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos@redhat.com [6]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl [3]>
wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nics
Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually.
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence >>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() >>> >> Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line 298, in netinfo _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 109, in get
return _get(vdsmnets) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 101, in _get
report_network_qos(networking) File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos iface, = host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [4] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
Links: ------ [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
--Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I=E2=80=99m having trouble with that plan and I=E2=80=99m not even = trying to put the ovirtmgmt bridge on an existing bond. I have a = pre-existing gluster setup with gluster running on a bonded interface. = The ovirtmgmt should go on a different interface, but even that fails on = the bond with the =E2=80=9Ctorn down manually=E2=80=9D statement. = Haven=E2=80=99t had much time to do more troubleshooting, but it=E2=80=99s= rather annoying.=20 I=E2=80=99d really prefer it if the installer would just deal with = existing network setups, I (presumably) know what I want there, = especially in the case of pre-existing gluster setups. -Darrell
On Nov 28, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com> = wrote: =20 What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge = manually over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do = anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration = file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up) =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost@familiealbers.nl = <mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl>> wrote: Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am = dealing with loads of systems. in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate = it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment. =20 =20 Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48: Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something.=20 =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> [8]> wrote: =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com <mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com> [7]> wrote: =20 What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script =20 This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond. =20 =20 =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> [6]> wrote: =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl = <mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl> [3]> wrote: =20 Hi All, =20 In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually . The bridge consisted of 2 nics =20 Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg =20 =20 When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install and would display the network setup correctly in the ui. =20 On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) I seem unable to follow the same approach. =20 In the engine logs i get among other things =20 If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. =20 the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep this way. =20 On the host vdsm.log i get limited info, =20 when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this =20 from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line 298, in netinfo _netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcompatibility) File =20 =20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 109, in get return _get(vdsmnets) File =20 =20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line 101, in _get report_network_qos(networking) File =20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", line 46, in report_network_qos iface, =3D host_ports ValueError: too many values to unpack =20 As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of nics i think. but either way. =20 Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics removed? =20 But do you need a bridge or a bond? =20 =20 If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past. =20 Thanks. =20 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [1] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users = <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [2] =20 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [4] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users = <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [5] =20 =20 =20 Links: ------ [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users = <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl <mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl> [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users = <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com <mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com> [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> =20 =20 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html = charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; = -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" = class=3D"">I=E2=80=99m having trouble with that plan and I=E2=80=99m not = even trying to put the ovirtmgmt bridge on an existing bond. I have a = pre-existing gluster setup with gluster running on a bonded interface. = The ovirtmgmt should go on a different interface, but even that fails on = the bond with the =E2=80=9Ctorn down manually=E2=80=9D statement. = Haven=E2=80=99t had much time to do more troubleshooting, but it=E2=80=99s= rather annoying. <div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div = class=3D"">I=E2=80=99d really prefer it if the installer would just deal = with existing network setups, I (presumably) know what I want there, = especially in the case of pre-existing gluster setups.</div><div = class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""> = -Darrell</div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote = type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On Nov 28, 2016, at 9:11 AM, = Charles Kozler <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" = class=3D"">ckozleriii@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br = class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div dir=3D"ltr" = class=3D"">What happens when you configure the bond and then build the = bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and = not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes = configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me = up)</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""><div = class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <span dir=3D"ltr"= class=3D""><<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" = target=3D"_blank" class=3D"">joost@familiealbers.nl</a>></span> = wrote:<br class=3D""><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 = 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for your = responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am dealing with loads = of systems.<br class=3D""> in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate = it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the = moment.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:<br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing<br = class=3D""> with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and<br = class=3D""> figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember<br = class=3D""> exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like<br = class=3D""> routing would break or something. <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br class=3D""></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">stirabos@redhat.com</a> [8]> wrote:<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler<br class=3D""></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">ckozleriii@gmail.com</a> [7]> wrote:<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC<span = class=3D""><br class=3D""> manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then<br = class=3D""> let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to<br = class=3D""> the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need<br = class=3D""> (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt<br = class=3D""> manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script<br = class=3D""> </span></blockquote><span class=3D""> <br class=3D""> This is fine.<br class=3D""> Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then<br = class=3D""> having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your<br = class=3D""> bond.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br class=3D""></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">stirabos@redhat.com</a> [6]> wrote:<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <<a = href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">joost@familiealbers.nl</a> [3]><br class=3D""> wrote:<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> Hi All,<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt<br class=3D""> bridge manually .<br class=3D""></span> The bridge consisted of 2 nics<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg<div class=3D""><div= class=3D"h5"><br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it<br class=3D""> would install and would display the network setup correctly in<br = class=3D""> the ui.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x<wbr class=3D"">86_64)<br = class=3D""> I seem unable to follow the same approach.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> In the engine logs i get among other things<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be<br class=3D""> torn-down manually.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would<br = class=3D""> like to keep this way.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote = class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc = solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" = style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence<br class=3D""> unified_persistence.netswitch.<wbr class=3D"">netinfo()<br class=3D""> </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> Traceback (most recent call last):<br class=3D""> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module><br class=3D""> File<br class=3D""> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr = class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netswitch.py"<wbr class=3D"">,<br class=3D""> line 298, in netinfo<br class=3D""> _netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcomp<wbr = class=3D"">atibility)<br class=3D""> File<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div></div></blockquote> <br class=3D""> </blockquote><div class=3D""><div class=3D"h5"> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr = class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr class=3D"">.py",<br = class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote = class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc = solid;padding-left:1ex"> line 109, in get<br class=3D""> return _get(vdsmnets)<br class=3D""> File<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </blockquote> <br class=3D""> </blockquote> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr = class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr class=3D"">.py",<br = class=3D""> </div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D""><div = class=3D"h5"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> line 101, in _get<br class=3D""> report_network_qos(networking)<br class=3D""> File<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </blockquote> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr = class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.<wbr class=3D"">py",<br = class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> line 46, in report_network_qos<br class=3D""> iface, =3D host_ports<br class=3D""> ValueError: too many values to unpack<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with<br = class=3D""> a list of nics i think.<br class=3D""> but either way.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with<br class=3D""> multiple nics removed?<br class=3D""> </blockquote> <br class=3D""> But do you need a bridge or a bond?<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 = .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D""><div = class=3D"h5"> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.<br = class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Thanks.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> ______________________________<wbr class=3D"">_________________<br = class=3D""> Users mailing list<br class=3D""> </div></div><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a> [1]<br class=3D""> <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr = class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a> [2]<br class=3D""> </blockquote> <br class=3D""> ______________________________<wbr class=3D"">_________________<br = class=3D""> Users mailing list<br class=3D""> <a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a> [4]<br class=3D""> <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr = class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a> [5]<br class=3D""> </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Links:<br class=3D""> ------<br class=3D""> [1] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a><br class=3D""> [2] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr = class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a><br class=3D""> [3] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">joost@familiealbers.nl</a><br class=3D""> [4] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a><br class=3D""> [5] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" = rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr = class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a><br class=3D""> [6] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">stirabos@redhat.com</a><br class=3D""> [7] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">ckozleriii@gmail.com</a><br class=3D""> [8] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">stirabos@redhat.com</a><br class=3D""> </blockquote> <br class=3D""> </blockquote></div><br class=3D""></div> _______________________________________________<br class=3D"">Users = mailing list<br class=3D""><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a><br = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br = class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br class=3D""></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E--
Op 28 nov. 2016 om 16:11 heeft Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com> het v=
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Charles, that worked, thanks!!! allthough im still wondering where this c= hange was listed at any point between 3.5 and 4.0.=20 Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone olgende geschreven:
=20 What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge manuall= y over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do anything. Ju= st make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration file as you expec= t (this is what used to screw me up) =20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost@familiealbers.nl> wrote: Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am deal= ing with loads of systems. in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it,= i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment. =20 =20 Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or something.=20 =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [8]> wrote: =20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii@gmail.com [7]> wrote: =20
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script =20 This is fine. Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond. =20 =20 =20 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com [6]> wrote: =20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost@familiealbers.nl [3]> wrote: =20 > Hi All, >=20 > In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt > bridge manually . > The bridge consisted of 2 nics >=20 > Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg >=20 >=20 > When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it > would install and would display the network setup correctly in > the ui. >=20 > On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64) > I seem unable to follow the same approach. >=20 > In the engine logs i get among other things >=20 > If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be > torn-down manually. >=20 > the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would > like to keep this way. >=20 > On the host vdsm.log i get limited info, >=20 > when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this >=20 >>>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence >>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo() > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > File > "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", > line 298, in netinfo > _netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcompatibility) > File >=20 =20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", > line 109, in get > return _get(vdsmnets) > File >=20 =20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", > line 101, in _get > report_network_qos(networking) > File >=20 "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py", > line 46, in report_network_qos > iface, =3D host_ports > ValueError: too many values to unpack >=20 > As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with > a list of nics i think. > but either way. >=20 > Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with > multiple nics removed? =20 But do you need a bridge or a bond? =20 =20 > If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org [1] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2] =20 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org [4] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5] =20 =20 =20 Links:
[1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com =20 =20
<br> <br> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it<br> would install and would display the network setup correctly in<br>
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D= utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>Hi Charles, that worked, thanks!!! all= though im still wondering where this change was listed at any point between 3= .5 and 4.0. <br><br>Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone</div><div><br>Op 28 nov= . 2016 om 16:11 heeft Charles Kozler <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.= com">ckozleriii@gmail.com</a>> het volgende geschreven:<br><br></div><blo= ckquote type=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">What happens when you configure t= he bond and then build the bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer sh= ould skip over it and not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set o= r routes configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up)= </div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 2= 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiea= lbers.nl" target=3D"_blank">joost@familiealbers.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>= <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an= option for me as i am dealing with loads of systems.<br> in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it, i a= m just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.<br> <br> <br> Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing<br> with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and<br> figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember<br> exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like<br> routing would break or something. <br> <br> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos@redhat= .com</a> [8]> wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler<br></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ckozleriii@gma= il.com</a> [7]> wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC<span class=3D"= "><br> manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then<br> let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to<br> the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need<br> (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt<br> manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script<br> </span></blockquote><span class=3D""> <br> This is fine.<br> Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then<br> having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your<br> bond.<br> <br> <br> <br> </span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-l= eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br></span> <<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos@redhat= .com</a> [6]> wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.= nl" target=3D"_blank">joost@familiealbers.nl</a> [3]><br> wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> Hi All,<br> <br> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt<br> bridge manually .<br></span> The bridge consisted of 2 nics<br> <br> Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg<div><div class=3D"h5"= the ui.<br> <br> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x<wbr>86_64)<br> I seem unable to follow the same approach.<br> <br> In the engine logs i get among other things<br> <br> If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be<br> torn-down manually.<br> <br> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would<br> like to keep this way.<br> <br> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,<br> <br> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar= gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote clas= s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd= ing-left:1ex"> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence<br> unified_persistence.netswitch.<wbr>netinfo()<br> </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> Traceback (most recent call last):<br> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module><br> File<br> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netswitch.py"<wbr>,<br> line 298, in netinfo<br> _netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcomp<wbr>atibility)<b= r> File<br> <br> </div></div></blockquote> <br> </blockquote><div><div class=3D"h5"> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr>.py",<= br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar= gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> line 109, in get<br> return _get(vdsmnets)<br> File<br> <br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr>.py",<= br> </div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor= der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class=3D"h5"><blockquote= class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid= ;padding-left:1ex"> line 101, in _get<br> report_network_qos(networking)<br> File<br> <br> </blockquote> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.<wbr>py",<br=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> line 46, in report_network_qos<br> iface, =3D host_ports<br> ValueError: too many values to unpack<br> <br> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with<br> a list of nics i think.<br> but either way.<br> <br> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with<br> multiple nics removed?<br> </blockquote> <br> But do you need a bridge or a bond?<br> <br> <br> </div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor= der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class=3D"h5"> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.<br> <br> Thanks.<br> <br> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Users mailing list<br> </div></div><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank">Users@ovirt= .org</a> [1]<br> <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"noreferrer"= target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a> [2= ]<br> </blockquote> <br> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Users mailing list<br> <a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a> [4]= <br> <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"noreferrer"= target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a> [5= ]<br> </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> <br> <br> <br> Links:<br> ------<br> [1] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank">Users@ovirt.= org</a><br> [2] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"norefer= rer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a=
<br> [3] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" target=3D"_blank">joost= @familiealbers.nl</a><br> [4] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank">Users@ovirt.= org</a><br> [5] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"norefer= rer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/users</a= <br> [6] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos= @redhat.com</a><br> [7] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ckozler= iii@gmail.com</a><br> [8] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos= @redhat.com</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote></div><br></div> </div></blockquote></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373--
participants (5)
-
Charles Kozler -
Darrell Budic -
Joost＠familiealbers.nl -
joost＠familiealbers.nl
-
Simone Tiraboschi