5:24 a.m.
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge
manually .
The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install
and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down
manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to
keep this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
line 298, in netinfo
_netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line
109, in get
return _get(vdsmnets)
File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py", line
101, in _get
report_network_qos(networking)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos
iface, = host_ports
ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of
nics i think.
but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple
nics removed?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
8:33 a.m.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Hi All,
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually .
The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install
and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
I seem unable to follow the same approach.
In the engine logs i get among other things
'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually. '
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep
this way.
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py", line
298, in netinfo
_netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 109, in get
return _get(vdsmnets)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 101, in _get
report_network_qos(networking)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos
iface, = host_ports
ValueError: too many values to unpack
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of
nics i think.
but either way.
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics
removed?
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
8:42 a.m.
What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually
when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the
bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond
the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I
tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the
hosted-engine --deploy script
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge manually
> .
> The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
>
> I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
>
> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install
> and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
>
> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>
> In the engine logs i get among other things
>
> 'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down manually.
> '
>
> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to keep
> this way.
>
> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>
>
>
> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>
> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
> line 298, in netinfo
> _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
> line 109, in get
> return _get(vdsmnets)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
> line 101, in _get
> report_network_qos(networking)
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
> line 46, in report_network_qos
> iface, = host_ports
> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>
>
> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of
> nics i think.
> but either way.
>
> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics
> removed?
>
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
8:43 a.m.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
manually
when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the
bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond
the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I
tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the
hosted-engine --deploy script
This is fine.
Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having
hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge
>> manually .
>> The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
>>
>> I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
>>
>> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install
>> and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
>>
>> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
>> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>>
>> In the engine logs i get among other things
>>
>> 'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down
>> manually. '
>>
>> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to
>> keep this way.
>>
>> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>>
>>
>>
>> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>>
>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
>> line 298, in netinfo
>> _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>> line 109, in get
>> return _get(vdsmnets)
>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>> line 101, in _get
>> report_network_qos(networking)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
>> line 46, in report_network_qos
>> iface, = host_ports
>> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>>
>>
>> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of
>> nics i think.
>> but either way.
>>
>> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple nics
>> removed?
>>
>
> But do you need a bridge or a bond?
>
>
>> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
8:48 a.m.
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing with
the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and figured using
the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember exactly what would
happen but it would be stupid little things like routing would break or
something.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> What I've been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC manually
> when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then let oVirt do the
> bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to the UI and I use it to bond
> the NICs in whatever fashion I need (LACP or active-backup). Any time I
> tried to configure ovirtmgmt manually it seemed to "annoy" the
> hosted-engine --deploy script
>
This is fine.
Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then having
hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your bond.
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt bridge
>>> manually .
>>> The bridge consisted of 2 nic's
>>>
>>> I'd have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
>>>
>>> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it would install
>>> and would display the network setup correctly in the ui.
>>>
>>> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
>>> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>>>
>>> In the engine logs i get among other things
>>>
>>> 'If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be torn-down
>>> manually. '
>>>
>>> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would like to
>>> keep this way.
>>>
>>> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>>>
>>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>>>>
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
>>> line 298, in netinfo
>>> _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>> line 109, in get
>>> return _get(vdsmnets)
>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>> line 101, in _get
>>> report_network_qos(networking)
>>> File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
>>> line 46, in report_network_qos
>>> iface, = host_ports
>>> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>>>
>>>
>>> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with a list of
>>> nics i think.
>>> but either way.
>>>
>>> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with multiple
>>> nics removed?
>>>
>>
>> But do you need a bridge or a bond?
>>
>>
>>> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
9:06 a.m.
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am
dealing with loads of systems.
in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate
it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing
with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and
figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember
exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like
routing would break or something.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com [8]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
> <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com [7]> wrote:
>
>> What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
>> manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then
>> let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to
>> the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need
>> (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt
>> manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
>
> This is fine.
> Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then
> having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your
> bond.
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
>> <stirabos(a)redhat.com [6]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl [3]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt
>>>> bridge manually .
>>>> The bridge consisted of 2 nics
>>>>
>>>> Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
>>>>
>>>> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it
>>>> would install and would display the network setup correctly in
>>>> the ui.
>>>>
>>>> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
>>>> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>>>>
>>>> In the engine logs i get among other things
>>>>
>>>> If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be
>>>> torn-down manually.
>>>>
>>>> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would
>>>> like to keep this way.
>>>>
>>>> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>>>>
>>>> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>>>>
>>>>>>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>>>> File
>>>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
>>>> line 298, in netinfo
>>>> _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
>>>> File
>>>>
>>>
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>> line 109, in get
>>>> return _get(vdsmnets)
>>>> File
>>>>
>>>
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>> line 101, in _get
>>>> report_network_qos(networking)
>>>> File
>>>>
>>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
>>>> line 46, in report_network_qos
>>>> iface, = host_ports
>>>> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>>>>
>>>> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with
>>>> a list of nics i think.
>>>> but either way.
>>>>
>>>> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with
>>>> multiple nics removed?
>>>
>>> But do you need a bridge or a bond?
>>>
>>>
>>>> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [1]
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [4]
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
Links:
------
[1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
[2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl
[4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
[5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
[7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com
[8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
9:11 a.m.
What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge manually
over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do anything.
Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration file as you
expect (this is what used to screw me up)
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am
dealing with loads of systems.
in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it,
i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
> Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing
> with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and
> figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember
> exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like
> routing would break or something.
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
> <stirabos(a)redhat.com [8]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
>> <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com [7]> wrote:
>>
>> What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
>>> manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then
>>> let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to
>>> the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need
>>> (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt
>>> manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
>>>
>>
>> This is fine.
>> Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then
>> having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your
>> bond.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
>>> <stirabos(a)redhat.com [6]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl [3]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt
>>>>> bridge manually .
>>>>> The bridge consisted of 2 nics
>>>>>
>>>>> Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist = ifcfg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it
>>>>> would install and would display the network setup correctly in
>>>>> the ui.
>>>>>
>>>>> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
>>>>> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the engine logs i get among other things
>>>>>
>>>>> If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be
>>>>> torn-down manually.
>>>>>
>>>>> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would
>>>>> like to keep this way.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>>>>>
>>>>> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>>>>>
>>>>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>>>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>>>>> File
>>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
>>>>> line 298, in netinfo
>>>>> _netinfo = netinfo_get(compatibility=compatibility)
>>>>> File
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>
>>>> line 109, in get
>>>>> return _get(vdsmnets)
>>>>> File
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>
>>>> line 101, in _get
>>>>> report_network_qos(networking)
>>>>> File
>>>>>
>>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
>>>>
>>>>> line 46, in report_network_qos
>>>>> iface, = host_ports
>>>>> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>>>>>
>>>>> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with
>>>>> a list of nics i think.
>>>>> but either way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with
>>>>> multiple nics removed?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But do you need a bridge or a bond?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [1]
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [4]
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
>>>>
>>>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
> [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl
> [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
> [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
> [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com
> [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
>
11:07 a.m.
--Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
I=E2=80=99m having trouble with that plan and I=E2=80=99m not even =
trying to put the ovirtmgmt bridge on an existing bond. I have a =
pre-existing gluster setup with gluster running on a bonded interface. =
The ovirtmgmt should go on a different interface, but even that fails on =
the bond with the =E2=80=9Ctorn down manually=E2=80=9D statement. =
Haven=E2=80=99t had much time to do more troubleshooting, but it=E2=80=99s=
rather annoying.=20
I=E2=80=99d really prefer it if the installer would just deal with =
existing network setups, I (presumably) know what I want there, =
especially in the case of pre-existing gluster setups.
-Darrell
On Nov 28, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Charles Kozler
<ckozleriii(a)gmail.com> =
wrote:
=20
What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge =
manually over
the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do =
anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration =
file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up)
=20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl =
<mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl>> wrote:
Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am
=
dealing with loads of systems.
in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate
=
it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.
=20
=20
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing
with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and
figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember
exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like
routing would break or something.=20
=20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> [8]> wrote:
=20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
<ckozleriii(a)gmail.com <mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com> [7]> wrote:
=20
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then
let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to
the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need
(LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt
manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script
=20
This is fine.
Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then
having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your
bond.
=20
=20
=20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
<stirabos(a)redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com> [6]> wrote:
=20
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl =
<mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl> [3]>
wrote:
=20
Hi All,
=20
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt
bridge manually .
The bridge consisted of 2 nics
=20
Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg
=20
=20
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it
would install and would display the network setup correctly in
the ui.
=20
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
I seem unable to follow the same approach.
=20
In the engine logs i get among other things
=20
If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be
torn-down manually.
=20
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would
like to keep this way.
=20
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
=20
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
=20
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
line 298, in netinfo
_netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcompatibility)
File
=20
=20
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 109, in get
return _get(vdsmnets)
File
=20
=20
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
line 101, in _get
report_network_qos(networking)
File
=20
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
line 46, in report_network_qos
iface, =3D host_ports
ValueError: too many values to unpack
=20
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with
a list of nics i think.
but either way.
=20
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with
multiple nics removed?
=20
But do you need a bridge or a bond?
=20
=20
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
=20
Thanks.
=20
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [1]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [2]
=20
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> [4]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> [5]
=20
=20
=20
Links:
------
[1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
[2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
[3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl
<mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl>
[4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
[5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
[6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com>
[7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com <mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com>
[8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com <mailto:stirabos@redhat.com>
=20
=20
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D"">I=E2=80=99m having trouble with that plan and I=E2=80=99m not =
even trying to put the ovirtmgmt bridge on an existing bond. I have a =
pre-existing gluster setup with gluster running on a bonded interface. =
The ovirtmgmt should go on a different interface, but even that fails on =
the bond with the =E2=80=9Ctorn down manually=E2=80=9D statement. =
Haven=E2=80=99t had much time to do more troubleshooting, but it=E2=80=99s=
rather annoying. <div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">I=E2=80=99d really prefer it if the installer would just deal =
with existing network setups, I (presumably) know what I want there, =
especially in the case of pre-existing gluster setups.</div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D""> =
-Darrell</div><div class=3D""><br
class=3D""><div><blockquote =
type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">On Nov 28,
2016, at 9:11 AM, =
Charles Kozler <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" =
class=3D"">ckozleriii(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div
dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D"">What happens when you configure the bond and then build the =
bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and =
not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes =
configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me =
up)</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br
class=3D""><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <span
dir=3D"ltr"=
class=3D""><<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" =
target=3D"_blank"
class=3D"">joost(a)familiealbers.nl</a>&gt;</span> =
wrote:<br class=3D""><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 =
0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for your =
responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am dealing with loads =
of systems.<br class=3D"">
in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate =
it, i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the =
moment.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class=3D"">
Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing<br =
class=3D"">
with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and<br =
class=3D"">
figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember<br =
class=3D"">
exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like<br =
class=3D"">
routing would break or something. <br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br
class=3D""></span>
<<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">stirabos(a)redhat.com</a> [8]> wrote:<br
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class=3D"">
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler<br
class=3D""></span>
<<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"
=
class=3D"">ckozleriii(a)gmail.com</a> [7]> wrote:<br
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC<span =
class=3D""><br class=3D"">
manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then<br =
class=3D"">
let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to<br =
class=3D"">
the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need<br =
class=3D"">
(LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt<br =
class=3D"">
manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script<br =
class=3D"">
</span></blockquote><span class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
This is fine.<br class=3D"">
Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then<br =
class=3D"">
having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your<br =
class=3D"">
bond.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class=3D"">
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi<br
class=3D""></span>
<<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">stirabos(a)redhat.com</a> [6]> wrote:<br
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <<a =
href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">joost(a)familiealbers.nl</a> [3]><br
class=3D"">
wrote:<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class=3D"">
Hi All,<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt<br class=3D"">
bridge manually .<br class=3D""></span>
The bridge consisted of 2 nics<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg<div
class=3D""><div=
class=3D"h5"><br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it<br class=3D"">
would install and would display the network setup correctly in<br =
class=3D"">
the ui.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x<wbr class=3D"">86_64)<br =
class=3D"">
I seem unable to follow the same approach.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
In the engine logs i get among other things<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be<br class=3D"">
torn-down manually.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would<br =
class=3D"">
like to keep this way.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence<br class=3D"">
unified_persistence.netswitch.<wbr class=3D"">netinfo()<br
class=3D"">
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Traceback (most recent call last):<br class=3D"">
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module><br
class=3D"">
File<br class=3D"">
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr =
class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netswitch.py"<wbr
class=3D"">,<br class=3D"">
line 298, in netinfo<br class=3D"">
_netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcomp<wbr =
class=3D"">atibility)<br class=3D"">
File<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</div></div></blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote><div class=3D""><div class=3D"h5">
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr =
class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr
class=3D"">.py",<br =
class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex">
line 109, in get<br class=3D"">
return _get(vdsmnets)<br class=3D"">
File<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr =
class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr
class=3D"">.py",<br =
class=3D"">
</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div
class=3D""><div =
class=3D"h5"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
line 101, in _get<br class=3D"">
report_network_qos(networking)<br class=3D"">
File<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr =
class=3D"">ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.<wbr
class=3D"">py",<br =
class=3D"">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
line 46, in report_network_qos<br class=3D"">
iface, =3D host_ports<br class=3D"">
ValueError: too many values to unpack<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with<br =
class=3D"">
a list of nics i think.<br class=3D"">
but either way.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with<br class=3D"">
multiple nics removed?<br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
But do you need a bridge or a bond?<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div
class=3D""><div =
class=3D"h5">
If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.<br =
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Thanks.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
______________________________<wbr class=3D"">_________________<br =
class=3D"">
Users mailing list<br class=3D"">
</div></div><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a> [1]<br class=3D"">
<a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr =
class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a> [2]<br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
______________________________<wbr class=3D"">_________________<br =
class=3D"">
Users mailing list<br class=3D"">
<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a> [4]<br class=3D"">
<a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr =
class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a> [5]<br class=3D"">
</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Links:<br class=3D"">
------<br class=3D"">
[1] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br class=3D"">
[2] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr =
class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a><br class=3D"">
[3] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl"
target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">joost(a)familiealbers.nl</a><br class=3D"">
[4] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br class=3D"">
[5] <a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr =
class=3D"">/listinfo/users</a><br class=3D"">
[6] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank"
=
class=3D"">stirabos(a)redhat.com</a><br class=3D"">
[7] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com"
target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">ckozleriii(a)gmail.com</a><br class=3D"">
[8] mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank"
=
class=3D"">stirabos(a)redhat.com</a><br class=3D"">
</blockquote>
<br class=3D"">
</blockquote></div><br class=3D""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class=3D"">Users =
mailing list<br class=3D""><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
=
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br =
class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br
class=3D""></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_34776E0A-9B01-4578-B615-B4F1A8FB865E--
12:05 p.m.
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Charles, that worked, thanks!!! allthough im still wondering where this c=
hange was listed at any point between 3.5 and 4.0.=20
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
in 3.5
ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and incorporate it, i a=
m just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the moment.<br <br <br Charles
Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:<br
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"" Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started
screwing<br with the the bond as well so I ended
up just dumbing it down and<br figured using the UI after the fact
would be OK. I cant remember<br exactly what would happen but it
would be stupid little things like<br routing
would break or something. <br
<br On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM,
Simone Tiraboschi<br></span
<<a href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com"
target=3D"_blank">stirabos@redhat=
.com</a> [8]> wrote:<br
<br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"" On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles
Kozler<br></span <<a
href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com"
target=3D"_blank">ckozleriii@gma=
il.com</a> [7]> wrote:<br
<br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is
just configuring one NIC<span class=3D"=
" let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once
the engine is up I login to<br the UI and I use it to bond the NICs
in whatever fashion I need<br (LACP or active-backup). Any time I
tried to configure ovirtmgmt<br manually it seemed to
"annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy script<br
</span></blockquote><span class=3D"" <br This is fine.<br Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and
then<br having hosted-engine-setup creating
the management bridge over your<br
bond.<br <br
<br <br
</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0
0 .8ex;border-l=
eft:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"" On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone
Tiraboschi<br></span <<a
href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com"
target=3D"_blank">stirabos@redhat=
.com</a> [6]> wrote:<br
<br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM,
<<a href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.=
nl" target=3D"_blank">joost(a)familiealbers.nl</a>
[3]><br wrote:<br <br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"" Hi All,<br
<br In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have
always setup the ovirtmgmt<br bridge manually
.<br></span The bridge consisted of 2
nics<br <br Id have
/etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg<div><div class=3D"h5"=
When i
then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it<br would
install and would display the network setup correctly in<br the ui.<br
<br On ovirt 4.
(vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x<wbr>86_64)<br I seem
unable to follow the same approach.<br
<br In the engine logs i get among other
things<br <br If the
interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be<br torn-down
manually.<br <br the
interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would<br like to keep this way.<br
<br On the host vdsm.log i get limited
info,<br <br when
start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this<br
<br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex" from vdsm.tool import
unified_persistence<br
unified_persistence.netswitch.<wbr>netinfo()<br </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote Traceback (most recent call last):<br File "<stdin>", line 1, in
<module><br File<br
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netswitch.py"<wbr>,<br line 298, in netinfo<br
_netinfo =3D
netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcomp<wbr>atibility)<b=
r File<br
<br
</div></div></blockquote
<br
</blockquote><div><div class=3D"h5"
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr>.py",<=
br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" line 109, in get<br
return _get(vdsmnets)<br
File<br <br
</blockquote <br
</blockquote
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache<wbr>.py",<=
br </div></div><blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div
class=3D"h5"><blockquote=
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid=
;padding-left:1ex" line 101, in _get<br report_network_qos(networking)<br File<br
<br </blockquote
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packa<wbr>ges/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.<wbr>py",<br=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" line 46, in
report_network_qos<br iface, =3D
host_ports<br ValueError: too many values to
unpack<br <br As it
appears the line in question does not like to deal with<br a list of
nics i think.<br but either way.<br <br Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the
ovirtmgmt bridge with<br multiple nics removed?<br </blockquote
<br But do you need a bridge or a
bond?<br <br <br
</div></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bor=
der-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div
class=3D"h5" If so what can i do to stick to what
we have done in the past.<br <br
Thanks.<br <br
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br Users mailing list<br
</div></div><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank">Users@ovirt=
.org</a> [1]<br <a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
rel=3D"noreferrer"=
target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/...
[2=
]<br </blockquote
<br
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br Users mailing list<br <a
href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank">Users(a)ovirt.org</a> [4]=
<br <a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
rel=3D"noreferrer"=
target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/...
[5=
]<br </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote <br <br
<br Links:<br ------<br [1]
mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank">Users(a)ovirt.=
org</a <br
</blockquote></div><br></div
</div></blockquote></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373--
Op 28 nov. 2016 om 16:11 heeft Charles Kozler
<ckozleriii(a)gmail.com> het v=
olgende geschreven:
=20
What happens when you configure the bond and then build the bridge manuall=
y over
the bond? oVirt installer should skip over it and not do anything. Ju=
st make sure you have DEFROUTE set or routes configuration file as you expec=
t (this is what used to screw me up)
=20
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl> wrote:
> Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an option for me as i am deal=
ing
with loads of systems.
> in 3.5 ovirt used to just accept the bridge as it was and
incorporate it,=
i am just wondering if i am facing a bug or a feature at the
moment.
>=20
>=20
> Charles Kozler schreef op 2016-11-28 15:48:
>> Thats what I used to do as well then on oVirt 4 it started screwing
>> with the the bond as well so I ended up just dumbing it down and
>> figured using the UI after the fact would be OK. I cant remember
>> exactly what would happen but it would be stupid little things like
>> routing would break or something.=20
>>=20
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
>> <stirabos(a)redhat.com [8]> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Charles Kozler
>>> <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com [7]> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> What Ive been doing since oVirt 4 is just configuring one NIC
>>>> manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1, etc) and then
>>>> let oVirt do the bridge setup. Once the engine is up I login to
>>>> the UI and I use it to bond the NICs in whatever fashion I need
>>>> (LACP or active-backup). Any time I tried to configure ovirtmgmt
>>>> manually it seemed to "annoy" the hosted-engine --deploy
script
>>>=20
>>> This is fine.
>>> Another thing you could do is manually creating the bond and then
>>> having hosted-engine-setup creating the management bridge over your
>>> bond.
>>>=20
>>> =20
>>>=20
>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Simone Tiraboschi
>>>> <stirabos(a)redhat.com [6]> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <joost(a)familiealbers.nl [3] >>>>> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> In our ovirt 3.5 setup. i have always setup the ovirtmgmt
>>>>>> bridge manually .
>>>>>> The bridge consisted of 2 nics
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Id have /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf list net_persist =3D ifcfg
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> When i then deployed the host from the ovirt ui or api it
>>>>>> would install and would display the network setup correctly in
>>>>>> the ui.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On ovirt 4. (vdsm-4.18.15.3-1.el7.centos.x86_64)
>>>>>> I seem unable to follow the same approach.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> In the engine logs i get among other things
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> If the interface ovirtmgmt is a bridge, it should be
>>>>>> torn-down manually.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> the interface is indeed a bridge with two nics which i would
>>>>>> like to keep this way.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On the host vdsm.log i get limited info,
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> when start a python terminal to obtain netinfo i get this
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> from vdsm.tool import unified_persistence
>>>>>>>>> unified_persistence.netswitch.netinfo()
>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module >>>>>> File
>>>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netswitch.py",
>>>>>> line 298, in netinfo
>>>>>> _netinfo =3D netinfo_get(compatibility=3Dcompatibility)
>>>>>> File
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>>>> line 109, in get
>>>>>> return _get(vdsmnets)
>>>>>> File
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/cache.py",
>>>>>> line 101, in _get
>>>>>> report_network_qos(networking)
>>>>>> File
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vdsm/network/netinfo/qos.py",
>>>>>> line 46, in report_network_qos
>>>>>> iface, =3D host_ports
>>>>>> ValueError: too many values to unpack
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> As it appears the line in question does not like to deal with
>>>>>> a list of nics i think.
>>>>>> but either way.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Is in ovirt 4 the ability to use the ovirtmgmt bridge with
>>>>>> multiple nics removed?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> But do you need a bridge or a bond?
>>>>> =20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> If so what can i do to stick to what we have done in the past.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [1]
>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [2]
>>>>>=20
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org [4]
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users [5]
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
>> [2] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> [3] mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl
>> [4] mailto:Users@ovirt.org
>> [5] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> [6] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
>> [7] mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com
>> [8] mailto:stirabos@redhat.com
>=20
=20
--Apple-Mail-1A8EB215-1481-422F-93C0-E43013B3B373
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type"
content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>Hi Charles, that
worked, thanks!!! all=
though im still wondering where this change was listed at any point between 3=
.5 and 4.0. <br><br>Verstuurd vanaf mijn
iPhone</div><div><br>Op 28 nov=
. 2016 om 16:11 heeft Charles Kozler <<a href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.=
com">ckozleriii(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; het volgende
geschreven:<br><br></div><blo=
ckquote type=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">What
happens when you configure t=
he bond and then build the bridge manually over the bond? oVirt installer sh=
ould skip over it and not do anything. Just make sure you have DEFROUTE set o=
r routes configuration file as you expect (this is what used to screw me up)=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 2=
8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a
href=3D"mailto:joost@familiea=
lbers.nl"
target=3D"_blank">joost(a)familiealbers.nl</a>&gt;</span>
wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Thanks for your responses but the ui is not an=
option for me as i am dealing with loads of systems.<br<br>
manually when I provision the server (eg: eth0, em1,
etc) and then<br<br>
<br<br>
[2] <a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"norefer=
rer"
target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/...
<br>
[3] mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:joost@familiealbers.nl" target=3D"_blank">joost=
@familiealbers.nl</a<br>
[4] mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank">Users(a)ovirt.=
org</a<br>
[5] <a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"norefer=
rer"
target=3D"_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/...
<br>
[6] mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos=
@redhat.com</a<br>
[7] mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:ckozleriii@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ckozler=
iii(a)gmail.com</a<br>
[8] mailto:<a
href=3D"mailto:stirabos@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank">stirabos=
@redhat.com</a<br>
</blockquote
2714
days inactive
2714
days old
8 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Charles Kozler -
Darrell Budic -
joost＠familiealbers.nl -
Joost＠familiealbers.nl
-
Simone Tiraboschi