Hello guys, Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming (teamd) is also supported with this version. My current package version(s): OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 VNC Encryption: | Disabled Is anyone running teamd on this version ? Thanks in advance -- Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Valentin Bajrami Target Holding
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hello guys,
Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming (teamd) is also supported with this version.
No, unfortunately not. May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding?
My current package version(s):
OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 VNC Encryption: | Disabled
Is anyone running teamd on this version ?
Thanks in advance
Hi Dominik and thanks for the quick reply. Purely the load balancing for LACP support and the low overhead. Since teamd is probably going to be the future I wanted to have oVirt using it. Furthermore, teamd is much more flexible to extend, add new interfaces, change priorities and you name it. It would be great if teamd support was added in the upcoming oVirt releases. I've seen there is an RFE for the same question I asked here. Thanks On 5/13/19 9:26 PM, Dominik Holler wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hello guys,
Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming (teamd) is also supported with this version.
No, unfortunately not. May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding?
My current package version(s):
OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 VNC Encryption: | Disabled
Is anyone running teamd on this version ?
Thanks in advance
-- Met vriendelijke groeten,
Valentin Bajrami Target Holding
On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:08:55 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hi Dominik and thanks for the quick reply. Purely the load balancing for LACP support and the low overhead. Since teamd is probably going to be the future I wanted to have oVirt using it. Furthermore, teamd is much more flexible to extend, add new interfaces, change priorities and you name it.
It would be great if teamd support was added in the upcoming oVirt releases. I've seen there is an RFE for the same question I asked here.
Thanks Valentin for your nice explanation. Would you comment this on the RFE Bug 1351510 - [RFE] Support using Team devices instead of bond devices or may I copy your text there?
Thanks
On 5/13/19 9:26 PM, Dominik Holler wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hello guys,
Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming (teamd) is also supported with this version.
No, unfortunately not. May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding?
My current package version(s):
OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 VNC Encryption: | Disabled
Is anyone running teamd on this version ?
Thanks in advance
Hi Dominik, Sure you can copy our conversation and add it to the RFE BZ. Thanks again and let's hope this'll be implemented in the coming oVirt releases. On 5/14/19 11:45 AM, Dominik Holler wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:08:55 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hi Dominik and thanks for the quick reply. Purely the load balancing for LACP support and the low overhead. Since teamd is probably going to be the future I wanted to have oVirt using it. Furthermore, teamd is much more flexible to extend, add new interfaces, change priorities and you name it.
It would be great if teamd support was added in the upcoming oVirt releases. I've seen there is an RFE for the same question I asked here.
Thanks Valentin for your nice explanation. Would you comment this on the RFE Bug 1351510 - [RFE] Support using Team devices instead of bond devices or may I copy your text there?
Thanks
On 5/13/19 9:26 PM, Dominik Holler wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 Valentin Bajrami <valentin.bajrami@target-holding.nl> wrote:
Hello guys,
Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming (teamd) is also supported with this version.
No, unfortunately not. May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding?
My current package version(s):
OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 VNC Encryption: | Disabled
Is anyone running teamd on this version ?
Thanks in advance
-- Met vriendelijke groeten,
Valentin Bajrami Target Holding
participants (2)
-
Dominik Holler -
Valentin Bajrami