6:22 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080009080202040109020900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi all,
I'm about to migrate from the dreyou 3.2 repo to the official 3.3
repositories. I was used to take live snapshot with
qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.5.x86_64 which was recompiled from the
redhat srpms, because live snapshot was not supported by the official
qemu-kvm in el6.4.
* Does now 6.5 include the correct qemu-kvm version for live snapshot?
* If not why does redhat provide a separate qemu package for RHEV
while fedora has got the correct package?
* Does ovirt team provide support for el6 live snapshot "out of the
box" or do they recommend to get the correct qemu-kvm version from
the rhev repository?
Assuming that redhat doesn't provide the same qemu-kvm in rhev than in
el6, what about including qemu-kvm-rhev in the ovirt el6 repository as
dreyou did ?
Thanks
--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
blanchet(a)abes.fr
--------------080009080202040109020900
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font size="-1">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I'm about to migrate from the dreyou 3.2 repo to the official 3.3
repositories. I was used to take live snapshot with
qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.5.x86_64 which was recompiled
from the redhat srpms, because live snapshot was not supported by
the official qemu-kvm in el6.4.<br>
</font>
<ul>
<li><font size="-1">Does now 6.5 include the correct qemu-kvm
version for live snapshot?</font></li>
<li><font size="-1">If not why does redhat provide a separate
qemu
package for RHEV while fedora has got the correct package? <br>
</font></li>
<li><font size="-1">Does ovirt team provide support for el6
live
snapshot "out of the box" or do they recommend to get the
correct qemu-kvm version from the rhev repository?</font></li>
</ul>
<font size="-1">Assuming that redhat doesn't provide the same
qemu-kvm in rhev than in el6, what about including qemu-kvm-rhev
in the ovirt el6 repository as dreyou did ?<br>
<br>
Thanks <br>
</font><br>
<font size="-1"><br>
</font>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:blanchet@abes.fr">blanchet@abes.fr</a> </pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------080009080202040109020900--
6:13 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
Hi all,
I'm about to migrate from the dreyou 3.2 repo to the official 3.3
repositories. I was used to take live snapshot with
qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.5.x86_64 which was recompiled from the
redhat srpms, because live snapshot was not supported by the official
qemu-kvm in el6.4.
* Does now 6.5 include the correct qemu-kvm version for live snapshot?
afaik, Centos uses the same compile options as RHEL which means it will *not* include live
snapshot capability.
Up until recently dreyou indeed provided qemu-kvm-rhev, but I believe that this is no
longer compiled.
* If not why does redhat provide a separate qemu package for RHEV
while
fedora has got the correct package?
* Does ovirt team provide support for el6 live snapshot "out of the box"
or do they recommend to get the correct qemu-kvm version from the rhev
repository?
We're still working to find an easy, maintainable way to fill the gap and this should
be resolved sometime soon.
In the interim you can either compile it yourself or if you have the package from other
sources, use that.
Assuming that redhat doesn't provide the same qemu-kvm in rhev
than in el6,
what about including qemu-kvm-rhev in the ovirt el6 repository as dreyou did
?
We're looking into including a qemu-kvm package that has the capabilities compiled in,
in the oVirt el6 repository indeed.
The alternative would be to have it shipped with el6 proper as it was up until now.
Thanks
--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14 blanchet(a)abes.fr
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
1:34 p.m.
Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share or
not? Just to let the people understand..
Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0 initial
release due to policies red hat uses?
I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat too.. Or
not?
Gianluca
6:04 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
To: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
or not? Just to let the people understand..
Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
initial release due to policies red hat uses?
I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
too.. Or not?
There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that would be possible
within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two such packages.
The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large amount of backported
features and bugfixes in many cases the backports were significant, perhaps more than
should have been done.
We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely to carry a
newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such as RHEV and RHEL-OSP) so
that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and more aggressively rebase in the layered
products.
The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same source as
qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't currently build that
package it could easily be done or perhaps built by oVirt.
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
12:50 p.m.
Skickat från min iPhone
28 dec 2013 kl. 16:04 skrev "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
> Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
> or not? Just to let the people understand..
> Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
> initial release due to policies red hat uses?
> I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
> too.. Or not?
There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that would be possible
within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two such packages.
The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large amount of
backported features and bugfixes in many cases the backports were significant, perhaps
more than should have been done.
We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely to carry
a newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such as RHEV and RHEL-OSP)
so that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and more aggressively rebase in the layered
products.
The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same source as
qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't currently build that
package it could easily be done or perhaps built by oVirt.
I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn that this was
not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why not CentOS, you know...
/K
> Gianluca
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
2:07 p.m.
Hi Karli,
----- Original Message -----
Skickat från min iPhone
28 dec 2013 kl. 16:04 skrev "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
>> To: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
>
>> Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
>> or not? Just to let the people understand..
>> Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
>> initial release due to policies red hat uses?
>> I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
>> too.. Or not?
>
> There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that
> would be possible within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two
> such packages.
> The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large
> amount of backported features and bugfixes in many cases the backports
> were significant, perhaps more than should have been done.
> We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely to
> carry a newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such
> as RHEV and RHEL-OSP) so that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and
> more aggressively rebase in the layered products.
>
> The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same
> source as qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't
> currently build that package it could easily be done or perhaps built by
> oVirt.
I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn
that this was not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why
not CentOS, you know...
Up until recently this was taken care of by Centos so there was no problem.
Now that it is not we're working on finding the best path to solve this.
There is no question that we will handle this.
/K
>
>> Gianluca
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
11:32 a.m.
Le 29/12/2013 12:07, Ayal Baron a écrit :
Hi Karli,
----- Original Message -----
>
> Skickat från min iPhone
>
> 28 dec 2013 kl. 16:04 skrev "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>:
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
>>> To: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
>>> Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
>>> or not? Just to let the people understand..
>>> Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
>>> initial release due to policies red hat uses?
>>> I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
>>> too.. Or not?
>> There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that
>> would be possible within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two
>> such packages.
>> The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large
>> amount of backported features and bugfixes in many cases the backports
>> were significant, perhaps more than should have been done.
>> We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely
to
>> carry a newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such
>> as RHEV and RHEL-OSP) so that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and
>> more aggressively rebase in the layered products.
>>
>> The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same
>> source as qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't
>> currently build that package it could easily be done or perhaps built by
>> oVirt.
> I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn
> that this was not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why
> not CentOS, you know...
Up until recently this was taken care of by Centos so there was no problem.
Now that it is not we're working on finding the best path to solve this.
There is no question that we will handle this.
However, glusterfs-3.4 is provided
in the repos by the ovirt team
(http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3.2/rpm/EL/6.5/x86_64/glusterfs-3.4...)
since an other gluster package is already available in the default el6
one... the same for jasperreport-server
(http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/3.3.2/rpm/EL/6.5/noarch/jasperreports...)
since jasperreport-server 4.7.0 is available in the centos repo... Why
couldn't be the case for qemu-kvm with qemu-kvm-rhev?
> /K
>
>>> Gianluca
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle exploitation et maintenance
Département des systèmes d'information
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
blanchet(a)abes.fr
2:39 p.m.
On 12/29/2013 11:50 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
Skickat från min iPhone
28 dec 2013 kl. 16:04 skrev "Andrew Cathrow" <acathrow(a)redhat.com>:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> From: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
>> To: "Ayal Baron" <abaron(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 5:34:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] about live snapshot and qemu-kvm
>
>> Yes, but is the reason of different versions something you can share
>> or not? Just to let the people understand..
>> Perhaps something related to compatibilities to maintain with 6.0
>> initial release due to policies red hat uses?
>> I think duplicating the maintenance effort is negative for red hat
>> too.. Or not?
>
> There are a few packages in RHEL that we need to move more quickly that would be
possible within the RHEL policies. OpenvSwitch and QEMU are two such packages.
> The version of QEMU in RHEL started on 0.12 and has since had a large amount of
backported features and bugfixes in many cases the backports were significant, perhaps
more than should have been done.
> We're getting to the point that in future versions of RHEL we're likely to
carry a newer version of packages like QEMU in the layered products (such as RHEV and
RHEL-OSP) so that we can keep the base versions in RHEL and more aggressively rebase in
the layered products.
>
> The qemu-kvm-rhev binary that's shipped in RHEV is built from the same source as
qemu-kvm but with a different build option. If CentOS doesn't currently build that
package it could easily be done or perhaps built by oVirt.
I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn that this was
not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why not CentOS, you know...
did anyone ask centos to simply build with this flag to enable these
features?
12:41 a.m.
On Dec 29, 2013 12:39 PM, "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> did anyone ask centos to simply build with this flag to
enable these
features?
CentOS builds packages exactly as Red Hat does for Rhel. It is strictly the
same.
But eventually we can ask to build a special package with this flag into
the CentOS plus repo:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus
Gianluca
6:38 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013, Itamar Heim wrote:
> I for one would very much like to see this built. I was
surprised to learn
> that this was not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why
> not CentOS, you know...
did anyone ask centos to simply build with this flag to
enable these features?
The CentOS bug tracker is open for suggestions from all
The RHEL buildsystem flags used are not published
systematically by Red Hat, in any venue that I am that I am
aware of. Obviously command line 'defines' and build
environment cause certain conditionals in a .spec file to be
triggered, one way or the other. Also the presence of -devel
type packages in a build chroot, not explicitly enumerated
through BuildRequires cause the auto-tools to add options
conditionally. Tool versions not publically released
sometimes are used to build packages [there were 'header
marks' from a gcc [and implied toolchain], that was never
externally released by Red Hat in the early 6 series, as I
recall]. And so on. The complexity explodes combinatorially
... and so a SRPM rebuild effort [of which CentOS is one]
builds, and tests, sometimes with ldd, and sometimes in other
ways, to see that a 'close enough' reproduction of the
binaries issued by Red Hat, are achieved
Out of curiousity, _what_ build environment 'flags' do you
all, participating in this thread, refer to? -- the thread
does not enumerate them explicitly, and one cannot expect to
hit by 'indirect fire', a target not exposed
With best regards, this New Year's eve
- -- Russ herrold
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlLDjcgACgkQMRh1QZtklkRMWACeJpv5D4Lmo/pk+bn/fdVEBYCY
JscAn369cgjOKVUZqJHrAYjRu/XkodCl
=d1tY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2:24 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:38 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
Out of curiousity, _what_ build environment 'flags' do you
all, participating in this thread, refer to? -- the thread
does not enumerate them explicitly, and one cannot expect to
hit by 'indirect fire', a target not exposed
With best regards, this New Year's eve
I'm far from being a programmer, but as I went to compare build
environments, between
qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
and
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
in related spec file I see
[g.cecchi@tekkaman SPECS]$ diff qemu-kvm.spec.upstream qemu-kvm.spec.rhev
3c3
< %define rhev 0
---
%define rhev 1
12928a12929
>>>>>>> rhel-6.5
and apart other probably not trivial implications, such as guest agent
part, I see that the "configure" command takes one extra argument in
base RH EL 6.5, that is
--disable-rhev-features
The only patch file containing this keyword is
kvm-Block-streaming-disable-for-RHEL.patch
and inside it there are these lines that impacts configure options and
related built qemu-kvm:
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ spice=""
smartcard=""
smartcard_nss=""
live_snapshots="yes"
+block_stream="yes"
usb_redir=""
# OS specific
@@ -686,10 +687,22 @@ for opt do
;;
--enable-live-snapshots) live_snapshots="yes"
;;
+ --disable-block-stream) block_stream="no"
+ ;;
+ --enable-block-stream) block_stream="yes"
+ ;;
--disable-usb-redir) usb_redir="no"
;;
--enable-usb-redir) usb_redir="yes"
;;
+ --disable-rhev-features)
+ live_snapshots="no";
+ block_stream="no";
+ ;;
+ --enable-rhev-features)
+ live_snapshots="yes";
+ block_stream="yes";
+ ;;
*) echo "ERROR: unknown option $opt"; show_help="yes"
;;
esac
@@ -863,8 +876,12 @@ echo " --disable-smartcard-nss disable
smartcard nss support"
echo " --enable-smartcard-nss enable smartcard nss support"
echo " --disable-live-snapshots disable live block device snapshot support"
echo " --enable-live-snapshots enable live block device snapshot support"
+echo " --disable-block-stream disable block streaming support"
+echo " --enable-block-stream enable block streaming support"
echo " --disable-usb-redir disable usb network redirection support"
echo " --enable-usb-redir enable usb network redirection support"
+echo " --disable-rhev-features disable RHEV-only features"
+echo " --enable-rhev-features enable RHEV-only features"
echo ""
echo "NOTE: The object files are built at the place where configure
is launched"
exit 1
@@ -2271,6 +2288,7 @@ echo "Trace backend $trace_backend"
echo "spice support $spice"
echo "nss used $smartcard_nss"
echo "Live snapshots $live_snapshots"
+echo "Block streaming $block_stream"
echo "xfsctl support $xfs"
echo "usb net redir $usb_redir"
@@ -2526,6 +2544,10 @@ if test "$live_snapshots" = "yes" ; then
echo "CONFIG_LIVE_SNAPSHOTS=y" >> $config_host_mak
fi
+if test "$block_stream" = "yes" ; then
+ echo "CONFIG_BLOCK_STREAM=y" >> $config_host_mak
+fi
+
if test "$usb_redir" = "yes" ; then
echo "CONFIG_USB_REDIR=y" >> $config_host_mak
fi
I don't think the rhev argument has instead implications in upstream
source qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2.tar.gz
So I think that if you want to dig more and if you have more
competences, you have to see the full spec file and the full patch
above.
Files downloaded here:
upstream
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/qemu-kv...
rhev
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu-...
Gianluca
10:42 p.m.
On 01/01/2014 06:24 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:38 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> Out of curiousity, _what_ build environment 'flags' do you
> all, participating in this thread, refer to? -- the thread
> does not enumerate them explicitly, and one cannot expect to
> hit by 'indirect fire', a target not exposed
>
> With best regards, this New Year's eve
I'm far from being a programmer, but as I went to compare build
environments, between
qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
and
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
in related spec file I see
[g.cecchi@tekkaman SPECS]$ diff qemu-kvm.spec.upstream qemu-kvm.spec.rhev
3c3
< %define rhev 0
---
> %define rhev 1
12928a12929
>>>>>>>> rhel-6.5
and apart other probably not trivial implications, such as guest agent
part, I see that the "configure" command takes one extra argument in
base RH EL 6.5, that is
--disable-rhev-features
The only patch file containing this keyword is
kvm-Block-streaming-disable-for-RHEL.patch
and inside it there are these lines that impacts configure options and
related built qemu-kvm:
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ spice=""
smartcard=""
smartcard_nss=""
live_snapshots="yes"
+block_stream="yes"
usb_redir=""
# OS specific
@@ -686,10 +687,22 @@ for opt do
;;
--enable-live-snapshots) live_snapshots="yes"
;;
+ --disable-block-stream) block_stream="no"
+ ;;
+ --enable-block-stream) block_stream="yes"
+ ;;
--disable-usb-redir) usb_redir="no"
;;
--enable-usb-redir) usb_redir="yes"
;;
+ --disable-rhev-features)
+ live_snapshots="no";
+ block_stream="no";
+ ;;
+ --enable-rhev-features)
+ live_snapshots="yes";
+ block_stream="yes";
+ ;;
*) echo "ERROR: unknown option $opt"; show_help="yes"
;;
esac
@@ -863,8 +876,12 @@ echo " --disable-smartcard-nss disable
smartcard nss support"
echo " --enable-smartcard-nss enable smartcard nss support"
echo " --disable-live-snapshots disable live block device snapshot support"
echo " --enable-live-snapshots enable live block device snapshot support"
+echo " --disable-block-stream disable block streaming support"
+echo " --enable-block-stream enable block streaming support"
echo " --disable-usb-redir disable usb network redirection support"
echo " --enable-usb-redir enable usb network redirection support"
+echo " --disable-rhev-features disable RHEV-only features"
+echo " --enable-rhev-features enable RHEV-only features"
echo ""
echo "NOTE: The object files are built at the place where configure
is launched"
exit 1
@@ -2271,6 +2288,7 @@ echo "Trace backend $trace_backend"
echo "spice support $spice"
echo "nss used $smartcard_nss"
echo "Live snapshots $live_snapshots"
+echo "Block streaming $block_stream"
echo "xfsctl support $xfs"
echo "usb net redir $usb_redir"
@@ -2526,6 +2544,10 @@ if test "$live_snapshots" = "yes" ; then
echo "CONFIG_LIVE_SNAPSHOTS=y" >> $config_host_mak
fi
+if test "$block_stream" = "yes" ; then
+ echo "CONFIG_BLOCK_STREAM=y" >> $config_host_mak
+fi
+
if test "$usb_redir" = "yes" ; then
echo "CONFIG_USB_REDIR=y" >> $config_host_mak
fi
I don't think the rhev argument has instead implications in upstream
source qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2.tar.gz
So I think that if you want to dig more and if you have more
competences, you have to see the full spec file and the full patch
above.
Files downloaded here:
upstream
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/qemu-kv...
rhev
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu-...
Just for the record, we have setup a jenkins job to rebuild qemu-kvm for
el6 until we get it officially from centos:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Packaging/job/qemu-kvm-rhev_create_rpms_el6/
--
Cheers
Douglas
7:55 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
Just for the record, we have setup a jenkins job to rebuild qemu-kvm for el6
until we get it officially from centos:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Packaging/job/qemu-kvm-rhev_create_rpms_el6/
Great! And thanks!
Gianluca
10 a.m.
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 14:42 -0500, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 01/01/2014 06:24 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:38 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>>
>> Out of curiousity, _what_ build environment 'flags' do you
>> all, participating in this thread, refer to? -- the thread
>> does not enumerate them explicitly, and one cannot expect to
>> hit by 'indirect fire', a target not exposed
>>
>> With best regards, this New Year's eve
>
> I'm far from being a programmer, but as I went to compare build
> environments, between
> qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
> and
> qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.3.src.rpm
> in related spec file I see
> [g.cecchi@tekkaman SPECS]$ diff qemu-kvm.spec.upstream qemu-kvm.spec.rhev
> 3c3
> < %define rhev 0
> ---
>> %define rhev 1
> 12928a12929
>>>>>>>>> rhel-6.5
>
> and apart other probably not trivial implications, such as guest agent
> part, I see that the "configure" command takes one extra argument in
> base RH EL 6.5, that is
>
> --disable-rhev-features
>
> The only patch file containing this keyword is
>
> kvm-Block-streaming-disable-for-RHEL.patch
>
> and inside it there are these lines that impacts configure options and
> related built qemu-kvm:
>
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ spice=""
> smartcard=""
> smartcard_nss=""
> live_snapshots="yes"
> +block_stream="yes"
> usb_redir=""
>
> # OS specific
> @@ -686,10 +687,22 @@ for opt do
> ;;
> --enable-live-snapshots) live_snapshots="yes"
> ;;
> + --disable-block-stream) block_stream="no"
> + ;;
> + --enable-block-stream) block_stream="yes"
> + ;;
> --disable-usb-redir) usb_redir="no"
> ;;
> --enable-usb-redir) usb_redir="yes"
> ;;
> + --disable-rhev-features)
> + live_snapshots="no";
> + block_stream="no";
> + ;;
> + --enable-rhev-features)
> + live_snapshots="yes";
> + block_stream="yes";
> + ;;
> *) echo "ERROR: unknown option $opt"; show_help="yes"
> ;;
> esac
> @@ -863,8 +876,12 @@ echo " --disable-smartcard-nss disable
> smartcard nss support"
> echo " --enable-smartcard-nss enable smartcard nss support"
> echo " --disable-live-snapshots disable live block device snapshot
support"
> echo " --enable-live-snapshots enable live block device snapshot
support"
> +echo " --disable-block-stream disable block streaming support"
> +echo " --enable-block-stream enable block streaming support"
> echo " --disable-usb-redir disable usb network redirection
support"
> echo " --enable-usb-redir enable usb network redirection
support"
> +echo " --disable-rhev-features disable RHEV-only features"
> +echo " --enable-rhev-features enable RHEV-only features"
> echo ""
> echo "NOTE: The object files are built at the place where configure
> is launched"
> exit 1
> @@ -2271,6 +2288,7 @@ echo "Trace backend $trace_backend"
> echo "spice support $spice"
> echo "nss used $smartcard_nss"
> echo "Live snapshots $live_snapshots"
> +echo "Block streaming $block_stream"
> echo "xfsctl support $xfs"
> echo "usb net redir $usb_redir"
>
> @@ -2526,6 +2544,10 @@ if test "$live_snapshots" = "yes" ; then
> echo "CONFIG_LIVE_SNAPSHOTS=y" >> $config_host_mak
> fi
>
> +if test "$block_stream" = "yes" ; then
> + echo "CONFIG_BLOCK_STREAM=y" >> $config_host_mak
> +fi
> +
> if test "$usb_redir" = "yes" ; then
> echo "CONFIG_USB_REDIR=y" >> $config_host_mak
> fi
>
> I don't think the rhev argument has instead implications in upstream
> source qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2.tar.gz
> So I think that if you want to dig more and if you have more
> competences, you have to see the full spec file and the full patch
> above.
>
> Files downloaded here:
>
> upstream
>
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/qemu-kv...
>
> rhev
>
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu-...
>
Just for the record, we have setup a jenkins job to rebuild qemu-kvm for
el6 until we get it officially from centos:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Packaging/job/qemu-kvm-rhev_create_rpms_el6/
--
Cheers
Douglas
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I think this calls for an oldschool question/statement;
Who da man? ... You da man! :)
Live snapshot now just works. Haven´t verified quiesce yet though, but
looks good as far as the events in webadmin is concerned. Next to test
is live disk migration.
--
Med Vänliga Hälsningar
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karli Sjöberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address
Kronåsvägen 8)
S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66
karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se
3931
days inactive
3987
days old
13 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Andrew Cathrow -
Ayal Baron -
Douglas Schilling Landgraf -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Itamar Heim -
Karli Sjöberg -
Nathanaël Blanchet -
R P Herrold