------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_" --_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments? Thanks. Markus --_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html dir=3D"ltr"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-= 1"> <style id=3D"owaParaStyle" type=3D"text/css">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:= 0;}</style> </head> <body ocsi=3D"0" fpstyle=3D"1"> <div style=3D"direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: = 10pt;">Hello,<br> <br> did not find any discussion thread about this topic. <br> Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor<br> host for OVirt 3.4 environments?<br> <br> Thanks.<br> <br> Markus<br> </div> </body> </html> --_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_-- ------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223 Content-Type: text/plain; name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt" **************************************************************************** Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung. Collogia Unternehmensberatung AG Ubierring 11 D-50678 Köln Vorstand: Kadir Akin Dr. Michael Höhnerbach Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Hans Kristian Langva Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln Registernummer: HRB 52 497 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a legally binding declaration of intention. Collogia Unternehmensberatung AG Ubierring 11 D-50678 Köln executive board: Kadir Akin Dr. Michael Höhnerbach President of the supervisory board: Hans Kristian Langva Registry office: district court Cologne Register number: HRB 52 497 **************************************************************************** ------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223--
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Not yet AFAIK. Bug tracker as RFE for it is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198 Gianluca
Well, as already noted in the BZ it is quite a mess because atm it's used to track engine and node/vdsm related bugs for fedora 20, which should get separated. Am 02.05.2014 11:11, schrieb Gianluca Cecchi:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Not yet AFAIK. Bug tracker as RFE for it is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198
Gianluca
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:11:58AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Not yet AFAIK. Bug tracker as RFE for it is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198
On the Engine node we still have a few issues, but as of ovirt-3.4.1 (pending imminent release) the hypervisor side is fine. Two relevant patches fixed for 3.4.1 are Bug 1078312 - F20 ovirt host installation fails due to python-ethtool SystemError Bug 1060383 - vdsm requires a compatible plugin with sos 3 and I am not aware of any other one. Please try it out!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Stockhausen" <stockhausen@collogia.de> To: "ovirt-users" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 2:07:26 AM Subject: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 as hypervisor
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic. Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
I'm running 3.4.1 on a pair of test hosts w/ F20. Seems to work so far... I had to install vdsm from fedora updates-testing to deal w/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312. Jason
Thanks.
Markus
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18 months: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server ? It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent announce of CentOS sponsored by Red Hat and several CentOS SIGs... but nevertheless it could bring value too... Gianluca
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18 months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to wait
It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent announce of CentOS sponsored by Red Hat and several CentOS SIGs... but nevertheless it could bring value too...
Gianluca
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18 months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to wait
Actually I'm synchronized with Fedora 21 schedule ~ Mid October this year: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule and one of its goal is indeed Fedora server: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Convert_Fedora_Cloud_Ima... So I would hope to have the first Fedora Server Release in time with release of Fedora 21.... In that case can we contribute to get adequate bits in fedora Server too? Or am I worng? Gianluca
Il 18/05/2014 10:08, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: > Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18 > months: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server > > ?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to wait
Actually I'm synchronized with Fedora 21 schedule ~ Mid October this year: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
Looking at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle I think that with F21 you'll have Fedora Server 1.0 preview 1. Fedora Server 1.0 final release will be based on F23.
and one of its goal is indeed Fedora server: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Convert_Fedora_Cloud_Ima...
So I would hope to have the first Fedora Server Release in time with release of Fedora 21.... In that case can we contribute to get adequate bits in fedora Server too? Or am I worng?
Gianluca
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>wrote:
Looking at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle
I think that with F21 you'll have Fedora Server 1.0 preview 1. Fedora Server 1.0 final release will be based on F23.
Ah, ok. I didn't see this link that confirms what you wrote before. Thanks, Gianluca
participants (6)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Jason Brooks -
Markus Stockhausen -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Sven Kieske