4:07 a.m.
------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_"
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html dir=3D"ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style id=3D"owaParaStyle" type=3D"text/css">P
{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:=
0;}</style>
</head>
<body ocsi=3D"0" fpstyle=3D"1">
<div style=3D"direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: =
10pt;">Hello,<br>
<br>
did not find any discussion thread about this topic. <br>
Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor<br>
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Markus<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735861E5DAEXCHANGEcollogi_--
------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
****************************************************************************
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497
****************************************************************************
------=_NextPartTM-000-8b54e83c-61bf-42dc-b36f-f03b61cda223--
4:11 a.m.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
Thanks.
Markus
Not yet AFAIK.
Bug tracker as RFE for it is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198
Gianluca
4:33 a.m.
Well, as already noted in the BZ it is quite a mess
because atm it's used to track engine and node/vdsm
related bugs for fedora 20, which should get separated.
Am 02.05.2014 11:11, schrieb Gianluca Cecchi:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
> Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor
> host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Markus
>
>
>
Not yet AFAIK.
Bug tracker as RFE for it is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198
Gianluca
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
5:02 a.m.
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:11:58AM +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
> Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor
> host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Markus
>
>
>
Not yet AFAIK.
Bug tracker as RFE for it is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060198
On the Engine node we still have a few issues, but as of ovirt-3.4.1
(pending imminent release) the hypervisor side is fine.
Two relevant patches fixed for 3.4.1 are
Bug 1078312 - F20 ovirt host installation fails due to python-ethtool SystemError
Bug 1060383 - vdsm requires a compatible plugin with sos 3
and I am not aware of any other one. Please try it out!
11:41 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Markus Stockhausen" <stockhausen(a)collogia.de>
To: "ovirt-users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Friday, May 2, 2014 2:07:26 AM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Fedora 20 as hypervisor
Hello,
did not find any discussion thread about this topic.
Is Fedora 20 already fully "supported" as hypervisor
host for OVirt 3.4 environments?
I'm running 3.4.1 on a pair of test hosts w/ F20.
Seems to work so far...
I had to install vdsm from fedora updates-testing to deal w/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078312.
Jason
Thanks.
Markus
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
6:28 p.m.
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable
"supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of 18
months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent announce
of CentOS sponsored by Red Hat and several CentOS SIGs... but nevertheless
it could bring value too...
Gianluca
10:19 a.m.
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a
stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle of
18
months:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to
wait
It is not completely clear to me how does it fit with the recent
announce of CentOS sponsored by Red Hat and several CentOS SIGs... but nevertheless
it could bring value too...
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
3:08 a.m.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a
stable "supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle
of 18
> months:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
>
> ?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2
years to wait
Actually I'm synchronized with Fedora 21 schedule ~ Mid October this year:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
and one of its goal is indeed Fedora server:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Convert_Fedora_Cloud_...
So I would hope to have the first Fedora Server Release in time with
release of Fedora 21....
In that case can we contribute to get adequate bits in fedora Server too?
Or am I worng?
Gianluca
1:41 a.m.
Il 18/05/2014 10:08, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
<sbonazzo(a)redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 01:28, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> Possibly this Fedora initiative could also help to have it both as a stable
"supported" oVirt engine and hypervisor due to its planned lifecycle
of 18
> months:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server
>
> ?
I hope so, but looks like before we'll have Fedora Server 1.0 we have ~2 years to
wait
Actually I'm synchronized with Fedora 21 schedule ~ Mid October this year:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
Looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle
I think that with F21 you'll have Fedora Server 1.0 preview 1.
Fedora Server 1.0 final release will be based on F23.
and one of its goal is indeed Fedora server:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/ChangeSet#Convert_Fedora_Cloud_...
So I would hope to have the first Fedora Server Release in time with release of Fedora
21....
In that case can we contribute to get adequate bits in fedora Server too?
Or am I worng?
Gianluca
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
5:58 p.m.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>wrote:
Looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle
I think that with F21 you'll have Fedora Server 1.0 preview 1.
Fedora Server 1.0 final release will be based on F23.
Ah, ok. I didn't see this link that confirms what you wrote before.
Thanks,
Gianluca
3638
days inactive
3655
days old
9 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Jason Brooks -
Markus Stockhausen -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Sven Kieske