4:35 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------5640B3BABD92E56AA1B64E20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just wanted to find out what filesystem people are using to host Virtual
Machines in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4 or XFS ?
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but wondered
if anyone could see any performance advantage when compared with ext4.
Fernando
--------------5640B3BABD92E56AA1B64E20
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Just wanted to find out
what filesystem people are using to host </font>Virtual Machines
in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4 or XFS ?<br>
<br>
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but
wondered if anyone could see any performance advantage when compared
with ext4.<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------5640B3BABD92E56AA1B64E20--
12:19 a.m.
------=_NextPartTM-000-0ebd3f3f-1908-49ec-bde5-c3b2eba7f8ca
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD173010E01D79FEXCHANGEcollo_"
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD173010E01D79FEXCHANGEcollo_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Fernando,
we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots in OV=
irt)
comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience excessive fragmentatio=
n.
For more info see unresolved Redhat Info:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663
Even with tuning the XFS allocation policy on the qcow2 directory with
xfs_io -c 'extsize -R 2M' <qcow2-dir>
A nice 3rd party explanation can be found here:
https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-deadl=
ock-kmem_alloc/
Markus
________________________________
Von: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org [users-bounces(a)ovirt.org]" im Auftrag von "FER=
NANDO FREDIANI [fernando.frediani(a)upx.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017 23:35
An: users(a)ovirt.org
Betreff: [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and XFS
Just wanted to find out what filesystem people are using to host Virtual Ma=
chines in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4 or XFS ?
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but wondered if=
anyone could see any performance advantage when compared with ext4.
Fernando
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD173010E01D79FEXCHANGEcollo_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html dir=3D"ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style type=3D"text/css" id=3D"owaParaStyle"></style>
</head>
<body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" fpstyle=3D"1" ocsi=3D"0">
<div style=3D"direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;font-size: 1=
0pt;">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">Hi Fernando,
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">we personally like
XFS=
very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots in OVirt)</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">comes close to a
no-go=
these days. We are experience excessive fragmentation.</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">For more info see
unre=
solved Redhat Info:</div>
<div><font face=3D"Tahoma"><span style=3D"font-size:
13px;"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Tahoma"><span style=3D"font-size:
13px;">https://access.=
redhat.com/solutions/532663</span></font></div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">Even with tuning the
X=
FS allocation policy on the qcow2 directory with </div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div><font face=3D"Tahoma"><span style=3D"font-size:
13px;">xfs_io -c 'exts=
ize -R 2M' <qcow2-dir></span></font></div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">A nice 3rd party
expla=
nation can be found here:</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div><font face=3D"Tahoma"><span style=3D"font-size:
13px;">https://blog.co=
decentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-deadlock-kmem_alloc/=
</span></font></div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;">Markus</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id=3D"ofmeet-extension-installed"
style=3D"display:none"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000; font-size: 16px=
">
<hr tabindex=3D"-1">
<div id=3D"divRpF447039" style=3D"direction: ltr;"><font
face=3D"Tahoma" si=
ze=3D"2" color=3D"#000000"><b>Von:</b>
users-bounces(a)ovirt.org [users-bounc=
es(a)ovirt.org]&quot; im Auftrag von "FERNANDO FREDIANI [fernando.fredia=
ni(a)upx.com]<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017 23:35<br>
<b>An:</b> users(a)ovirt.org<br>
<b>Betreff:</b> [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and
XFS<=
br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><font face=3D"arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Just wanted to find
out wh=
at filesystem people are using to host
</font>Virtual Machines in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext=
4 or XFS ?<br>
<br>
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but wondered if=
anyone could see any performance advantage when compared with ext4.<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD173010E01D79FEXCHANGEcollo_--
------=_NextPartTM-000-0ebd3f3f-1908-49ec-bde5-c3b2eba7f8ca
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
****************************************************************************
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497
****************************************************************************
------=_NextPartTM-000-0ebd3f3f-1908-49ec-bde5-c3b2eba7f8ca--
8:36 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------00EFFC74F23A0F6D5A7D770C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Many thanks for your input Markus. Helps to device before putting the
server in production.
Regards
Fernando
On 08/06/2017 02:19, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Hi Fernando,
we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots
in OVirt)
comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience excessive
fragmentation.
For more info see unresolved Redhat Info:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663
Even with tuning the XFS allocation policy on the qcow2 directory with
xfs_io -c 'extsize -R 2M' <qcow2-dir>
A nice 3rd party explanation can be found here:
https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-dea...
Markus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Von:* users-bounces(a)ovirt.org [users-bounces(a)ovirt.org]" im Auftrag
von "FERNANDO FREDIANI [fernando.frediani(a)upx.com]
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017 23:35
*An:* users(a)ovirt.org
*Betreff:* [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and XFS
Just wanted to find out what filesystem people are using to host
Virtual Machines in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4
or XFS ?
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but
wondered if anyone could see any performance advantage when compared
with ext4.
Fernando
--------------00EFFC74F23A0F6D5A7D770C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Many thanks for your input Markus. Helps to device before putting
the server in production.</p>
<p>Regards<br>
Fernando<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/06/2017 02:19, Markus Stockhausen
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD173010E01D79F@EXCHANGE.collogia.de">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" id="owaParaStyle"></style>
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Arial;color:
#000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">Hi
Fernando, </div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">we
personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2
(even for snapshots in OVirt)</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">comes
close to a no-go these days. We are experience
excessive fragmentation.</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">For
more info see unresolved Redhat Info:</div>
<div><font face="Tahoma"><span
style="font-size:
13px;"><br>
</span></font></div>
<div><font face="Tahoma"><span
style="font-size:
13px;"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663">https://ac...
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">Even
with tuning the XFS allocation policy on the
qcow2 directory with </div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Tahoma"><span
style="font-size:
13px;">xfs_io -c 'extsize -R 2M'
<qcow2-dir></span></font></div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">A
nice 3rd party explanation can be found here:</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Tahoma"><span
style="font-size:
13px;"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-deadlock-kmem_alloc/">https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-deadlock-kmem_alloc/</a></span></font></div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;">Markus</div>
<div style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #000000;
font-size: 16px">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRpF447039" style="direction:
ltr;"><font
color="#000000" face="Tahoma"
size="2"><b>Von:</b>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a>]"
im
Auftrag von "FERNANDO FREDIANI [<a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com">fernando.frediani@upx.com</a>]<br>
<b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017 23:35<br>
<b>An:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> [ovirt-users] Performance differences
between ext4 and XFS<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Just wanted
to
find out what filesystem people are using to host
</font>Virtual Machines in qcow2 files in a filesystem in
Localstorage, ext4 or XFS ?<br>
<br>
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs,
but wondered if anyone could see any performance advantage
when compared with ext4.<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------00EFFC74F23A0F6D5A7D770C--
11:13 a.m.
--Apple-Mail=_3D21898F-64FE-46D0-BF2A-D3D37F516006
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
I just got bitten by this particular problem, on a heavily used disk =
image. I'm trying to defragment the disk images. Hop this will help.
Le 8 juin 2017 =C3=A0 07:19, Markus Stockhausen =
<stockhausen(a)collogia.de> a =C3=A9crit :
=20
Hi Fernando,=20
=20
we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for snapshots =
in OVirt)
comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience excessive =
fragmentation.
For more info see unresolved Redhat Info:
=20
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663 =
<https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663>
=20
Even with tuning the XFS allocation policy on the qcow2 directory with=20=
=20
xfs_io -c 'extsize -R 2M' <qcow2-dir>
=20
A nice 3rd party explanation can be found here:
=20
=
https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-dead=
lock-kmem_alloc/ =
<https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocation-dea=
dlock-kmem_alloc/>
=20
Markus
=20
Von: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org <mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org> =
[users-bounces(a)ovirt.org <mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org>]" im Auftrag =
von "FERNANDO FREDIANI [fernando.frediani(a)upx.com =
<mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com>]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017 23:35
An: users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Betreff: [ovirt-users] Performance differences between ext4 and XFS
=20
Just wanted to find out what filesystem people are using to host =
Virtual Machines
in qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4 or =
XFS ?
=20
I normally like XFS for big files which is the case fo VMs, but =
wondered if
anyone could see any performance advantage when compared =
with ext4.
=20
Fernando
=
<InterScan_Disclaimer.txt>_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
--Apple-Mail=_3D21898F-64FE-46D0-BF2A-D3D37F516006
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D"">I just got bitten by this particular problem, on a heavily =
used disk image. I'm trying to defragment the disk images. Hop this will =
help.<div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D""><br =
class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite"
class=3D""><div class=3D"">Le =
8 juin 2017 =C3=A0 07:19, Markus Stockhausen <<a =
href=3D"mailto:stockhausen@collogia.de" =
class=3D"">stockhausen(a)collogia.de</a>&gt; a =C3=A9crit
:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div
=
style=3D"font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: =
normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; =
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: =
auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); direction: ltr; font-family: =
Arial; font-size: 10pt;" class=3D""><div
class=3D""><div class=3D""><div =
class=3D""><div class=3D""><div
class=3D""><div class=3D""><div =
class=3D""><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"
=
class=3D"">Hi Fernando,<span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span></div><div =
style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;" class=3D""><br
=
class=3D""></div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;" =
class=3D"">we personally like XFS very much. But XFS + qcow2 (even for =
snapshots in OVirt)</div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: =
13px;" class=3D"">comes close to a no-go these days. We are experience
=
excessive fragmentation.</div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; =
font-size: 13px;" class=3D"">For more info see unresolved Redhat =
Info:</div><div class=3D""><font face=3D"Tahoma"
class=3D""><span =
style=3D"font-size: 13px;" class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></span></font></div><div
class=3D""><font face=3D"Tahoma" =
class=3D""><span style=3D"font-size: 13px;"
class=3D""><a =
href=3D"https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663" =
class=3D"">https://access.redhat.com/solutions/532663</a&...
iv><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;"
class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;" =
class=3D"">Even with tuning the XFS allocation policy on the qcow2 =
directory with </div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
=
13px;" class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D""><font =
face=3D"Tahoma" class=3D""><span style=3D"font-size:
13px;" =
class=3D"">xfs_io -c 'extsize -R 2M' =
<qcow2-dir></span></font></div><div
style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; =
font-size: 13px;" class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div =
style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;" class=3D"">A nice
3rd =
party explanation can be found here:</div><div style=3D"font-family: =
Tahoma; font-size: 13px;" class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D""><font face=3D"Tahoma"
class=3D""><span style=3D"font-size: =
13px;" class=3D""><a =
href=3D"https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allocat=
ion-deadlock-kmem_alloc/" =
class=3D"">https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/04/xfs-possible-memory-allo=
cation-deadlock-kmem_alloc/</a></span></font></div><div =
style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px;" class=3D""><br
=
class=3D""></div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma; font-size:
13px;" =
class=3D"">Markus</div><div style=3D"font-family: Tahoma;
font-size: =
13px;" class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div
=
style=3D"font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px;"
class=3D""><hr =
tabindex=3D"-1" class=3D""><div id=3D"divRpF447039"
style=3D"direction: =
ltr;" class=3D""><font face=3D"Tahoma" size=3D"2"
class=3D""><b =
class=3D"">Von:</b><span
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span><a =
href=3D"mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org" =
class=3D"">users-bounces(a)ovirt.org</a><span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span>[<a =
href=3D"mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org" =
class=3D"">users-bounces(a)ovirt.org</a>]" im Auftrag von
"FERNANDO =
FREDIANI [<a href=3D"mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com" =
class=3D"">fernando.frediani(a)upx.com</a>]<br
class=3D""><b =
class=3D"">Gesendet:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span>Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017
=
23:35<br class=3D""><b class=3D"">An:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span><a =
href=3D"mailto:users@ovirt.org"
class=3D"">users(a)ovirt.org</a><br =
class=3D""><b class=3D"">Betreff:</b><span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span>[ovirt-users]
Performance =
differences between ext4 and XFS<br class=3D""></font><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D""></div><div
class=3D""><font =
face=3D"arial, helvetica, sans-serif" class=3D"">Just wanted to
find out =
what filesystem people are using to host<span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> </span></font>Virtual
Machines in =
qcow2 files in a filesystem in Localstorage, ext4 or XFS ?<br =
class=3D""><br class=3D"">I normally like XFS for big files
which is the =
case fo VMs, but wondered if anyone could see any performance advantage =
when compared with ext4.<br class=3D""><br
class=3D"">Fernando<br =
class=3D""></div></div></div><span =
id=3D"cid:0583B5F5-532F-462E-A18F-E203C8395CED@dsone.3ds.com"><InterSca=
n_Disclaimer.txt></span><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; =
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); float: none; display: inline =
!important;" =
class=3D"">_______________________________________________</span><br
=
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: =
none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" =
class=3D""><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; =
font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; =
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: =
rgb(255, 255, 255); float: none; display: inline !important;" =
class=3D"">Users mailing list</span><br style=3D"font-family:
Helvetica; =
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=3D""><a =
href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; =
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; =
font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: =
none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" =
class=3D""><a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: =
none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<... =
style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; =
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: =
none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" =
class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br
class=3D""></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_3D21898F-64FE-46D0-BF2A-D3D37F516006--
2721
days inactive
2727
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Fabrice Bacchella -
FERNANDO FREDIANI -
Markus Stockhausen