5:09 p.m.
Hi Folks,
I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one
or two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be
using a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use
NFS4. I'm wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt
3.6.2, or should I start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is
3.6 generally stable enough for production use? We're not doing
anything very complicated, just running a few Linux webserver VMs. No
high availability or auto-deployment type stuff.
3:45 a.m.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Charles Tassell <charles(a)islandadmin.ca> wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one or
two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be using
a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I'm
wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt 3.6.2, or should I
start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is 3.6 generally stable
enough for production use? We're not doing anything very complicated, just
running a few Linux webserver VMs. No high availability or auto-deployment
type stuff.
By all means, use oVirt 3.6. It works great and is recommended for
production use. I highly recommend you deploy it on RHEL/CentOS 7.2,
for best results.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
11:08 a.m.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Charles Tassell
<charles(a)islandadmin.ca>
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one
or
> two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be
using
> a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use NFS4. I'm
> wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt 3.6.2, or should
I
> start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is 3.6 generally stable
> enough for production use? We're not doing anything very complicated,
just
> running a few Linux webserver VMs. No high availability or
auto-deployment
> type stuff.
By all means, use oVirt 3.6. It works great and is recommended for
production use. I highly recommend you deploy it on RHEL/CentOS 7.2,
for best results.
+2 to both points:
- There are no plans to fix issues in 3.5.x - only in 3.6.x releases
- 7.2 hosts are preferred as some features are only available there.
Y.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
8:30 a.m.
Charles,
If you like thin provisioning, I'd not recommend to move NFS->iSCSI. Thin
provisioned disks become Preallocated during migration from a file to block storage.
On 06/02/16 20:09, "users-bounces(a)ovirt.org on behalf of Charles Tassell"
<users-bounces(a)ovirt.org on behalf of charles(a)islandadmin.ca> wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm setting up a small virtualization system that will start with one
or two hosts and then probably grow to 4-5 hosts. We will eventually be
using a shared iSCSI datastore, but right now I'll probably just use
NFS4. I'm wondering if I should stick with my plan of using oVirt
3.6.2, or should I start of with 3.5 and upgrade at a later date. Is
3.6 generally stable enough for production use? We're not doing
anything very complicated, just running a few Linux webserver VMs. No
high availability or auto-deployment type stuff.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3301
days inactive
3303
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Charles Tassell -
Neal Gompa -
Pavel Gashev -
Yaniv Kaul