Thank you. The mention of Fedora then should be removed from the release notes, maybe even stating that it's not recommended?

On 11/30/2017 4:21 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Blaster <Blaster(a)556nato.com&gt; wrote: >> >> Is Fedora not supported anymore? >> >> I've read the release notes for the 4.2r2 beta and 4.1.7, they mention >> specific versions of RHEL and CentOS, but only mention Fedora by name, >> with >> no specific version information. > > We currently have too many problems with fedora to call it even 'Technical > Preview', as was done in the past. > > You can still use the nightly snapshots, and most things work, > more-or-less, > with some issues having known workarounds. See e.g.: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1460625&hide_re... > > And also: > > http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2017-August/030990.html > > (not sure that one is still relevant for Fedora 27, didn't check > recently). > >> On 11/15/2017 9:17 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote >> >> >> This release is available now on x86_64 architecture for: >> >> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later >> >> * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later >> >> >> This release supports Hypervisor Hosts on x86_64 and ppc64le >> architectures >> for: >> >> * Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later >> >> * CentOS Linux (or similar) 7.4 or later >> >> * oVirt Node 4.2 (available for x86_64 only) >> >> tp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > >