Thank you for your help, Jiri!
My expectations are based on experience with other cloud platforms and
since oVirt doesn't work like that, we simply won't use it. :-)
My post was simply for purpose to see if I am missing something, but you
confirmed that I am not.
Once again, thank you a lot!
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Jiri Belka <jbelka(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> No, it doesn't work as expected. I would expect to have an
option to
attach
> to any Virtual Machine storage which is either shared or local.
It does work as expected, do your homework first to know how oVirt does
work. Your expectation are just your expectations.
Question: How would you migrate a VM in a cluster with local storage?
Wouldn't glusterfs solve the issue? It can use those SSDs... (Not expert
in glusters here...).
j.
> For example, I have database server so I could put on shared storage and
> use local, SSD disk for data. I don't care if system is on "slow"
network
> storage but with a lot of space and in the same time, I can use limited,
> but fast SSD space for data only.
>
> So, is this possible or not?
>
> [...]
> > > Currently at the company, we are testing oVirt 3.5 as a cloud
platform.
> > > We have 4 nodes and GlusterFS as a shared storage.
> > > Every node has another SSD disk, currently not used. What we would
like
> > is to
> > > attach that local storage to particular host, so that some virtual
> > machines
> > > can be on local and some on shared storage.
> > > If I try to create local storage, it works, but then host is in
separate
> > Data
> > > Center.
> > > If I try to add POSIX FS to node in existing Data Center, then all
other
> > > hosts stop working, since they can't access that local storage (kind
of
> > > expected).
> > >
> > > So, long story short - does shared and local storage mix and how?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much!
> >
> > Works as expected, doesn't it? What do you want to exactly achieve
> > with local storage?
--
Damir Marković | System Engineer | Nordeus