8:59 a.m.
Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt Node ? How are you
finding it compared to Bonding ?
Has it helped in some way with the new features it brings.
For example: one feature VMware does it when you create a given
portgroup for a group of VMs you may set that portgroup to use one
physical NIC as Active and others as Backup, while in another portgroup
you may set otherwise. Then you have both failover for both portgroups
and better bandwidth usage.
Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along with oVirt/libvirt+KVM ?
Thanks
Fernando
12:06 p.m.
Well, I just found that Teaming doesn't seem to be recognized by oVirt,
only Bonding. Am I correct ?
Fernando
On 30/01/2017 12:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:
Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt Node ? How are
you finding it compared to Bonding ?
Has it helped in some way with the new features it brings.
For example: one feature VMware does it when you create a given
portgroup for a group of VMs you may set that portgroup to use one
physical NIC as Active and others as Backup, while in another
portgroup you may set otherwise. Then you have both failover for both
portgroups and better bandwidth usage.
Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along with
oVirt/libvirt+KVM ?
Thanks
Fernando
12:49 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Fernando Frediani <
fernando.frediani(a)upx.com.br> wrote:
Well, I just found that Teaming doesn't seem to be recognized by
oVirt,
only Bonding. Am I correct ?
Yes, that's correct. Does it make a difference in your deployment?
Y.
Fernando
On 30/01/2017 12:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:
> Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt Node ? How are you
> finding it compared to Bonding ?
>
> Has it helped in some way with the new features it brings.
>
> For example: one feature VMware does it when you create a given portgroup
> for a group of VMs you may set that portgroup to use one physical NIC as
> Active and others as Backup, while in another portgroup you may set
> otherwise. Then you have both failover for both portgroups and better
> bandwidth usage.
>
> Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along with oVirt/libvirt+KVM
> ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Fernando
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
1:07 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------1049AE6E78B6D4402890598C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Yaniv. Not that much.
As I am starting a new environment I wanted to make usage of some new
features present in Teaming. Guess suport will come soon.
Thanks for replying.
Fernando
On 01/02/2017 16:49, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Fernando Frediani
<fernando.frediani(a)upx.com.br <mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br>>
wrote:
Well, I just found that Teaming doesn't seem to be recognized by
oVirt, only Bonding. Am I correct ?
Yes, that's correct. Does it make a difference in your deployment?
Y.
Fernando
On 30/01/2017 12:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:
Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt Node ?
How are you finding it compared to Bonding ?
Has it helped in some way with the new features it brings.
For example: one feature VMware does it when you create a
given portgroup for a group of VMs you may set that portgroup
to use one physical NIC as Active and others as Backup, while
in another portgroup you may set otherwise. Then you have both
failover for both portgroups and better bandwidth usage.
Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along with
oVirt/libvirt+KVM ?
Thanks
Fernando
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
--------------1049AE6E78B6D4402890598C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hi Yaniv. Not that much.</p>
<p>As I am starting a new environment I wanted to make usage of some
new features present in Teaming. Guess suport will come soon.</p>
<p>Thanks for replying.</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/02/2017 16:49, Yaniv Kaul
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJgorsbX=BA4YGVYdUJuynmfz7Rpe8jG3W-XAZi_Eg6bZ_xyZA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:06 PM,
Fernando Frediani <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br"
target="_blank"><a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a></a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Well, I
just found that Teaming doesn't seem to be recognized by
oVirt, only Bonding. Am I correct ?</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yes, that's correct. Does it make a difference in your
deployment?</div>
<div>Y.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="HOEnZb"><font
color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Fernando</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 30/01/2017 12:59, Fernando Frediani wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Has anyone used NIC Teaming in production with oVirt
Node ? How are you finding it compared to Bonding ?<br>
<br>
Has it helped in some way with the new features it
brings.<br>
<br>
For example: one feature VMware does it when you
create a given portgroup for a group of VMs you may
set that portgroup to use one physical NIC as Active
and others as Backup, while in another portgroup you
may set otherwise. Then you have both failover for
both portgroups and better bandwidth usage.<br>
<br>
Does Teaming do that kind of thing when used along
with oVirt/libvirt+KVM ?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Users mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target="_blank">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman<wbr>/li...
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------1049AE6E78B6D4402890598C--
2639
days inactive
2641
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Fernando Frediani -
Yaniv Kaul