3:57 p.m.
Hi all!
My name is Paolo and I'm the sysadmin of the research group (infosec)
where I work.
Recently our infrastructure was updated and I'm planning to use oVirt
as virtualisation manager. The new "toys" they gave me are
- HP DL360G9 (x2)
- HP MSA1040 (double controller with mini SAS connection)
By exploring the oVIrt documentation, seems that the best solution for
storage management would be having something like NSF, iSCSI and so
on. Unfortunately, LUNs exposed by our MSA1040 are recognised by the
two DL36G9 as directly-attached SCSI devices.
I asked Google and I found this old post from the far 2013
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017924.html
that seems to be very similar to my case and the scenario is not rosy... :-(
Is now, in 2016, something changed? Have you something to suggest?
Many thanks,
Paolo
--
PAOLO SMIRAGLIA
9:04 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Paolo Smiraglia
<paolo.smiraglia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all!
My name is Paolo and I'm the sysadmin of the research group (infosec)
where I work.
Recently our infrastructure was updated and I'm planning to use oVirt
as virtualisation manager. The new "toys" they gave me are
- HP DL360G9 (x2)
- HP MSA1040 (double controller with mini SAS connection)
By exploring the oVIrt documentation, seems that the best solution for
storage management would be having something like NSF, iSCSI and so
on. Unfortunately, LUNs exposed by our MSA1040 are recognised by the
two DL36G9 as directly-attached SCSI devices.
Do you see the luns exposed by this storage on both hosts?
The output of "lsblk" and "multipath -ll" may be helpful.
If you do, you can treat them as FC storage, and create a FC storage domain
with these luns.
Nir
I asked Google and I found this old post from the far 2013
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017924.html
that seems to be very similar to my case and the scenario is not rosy... :-(
Is now, in 2016, something changed? Have you something to suggest?
Many thanks,
Paolo
--
PAOLO SMIRAGLIA
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
10:03 p.m.
Hi Paolo,
If your storage is detected by multipathd as a multipath capable device
(it should, even if connected through only one connection), oVirt will
detect it as "fibre channel" storage and selecting that as the storage
type should work.
We use a similar setup (with Dell powervault storage) and haven't had
any problems with it.
Regards,
Rik
--
Rik Theys
System Engineer
KU Leuven - Dept. Elektrotechniek (ESAT)
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2440 - B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
+32(0)16/32.11.07
----------------------------------------------------------------
<<Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors>>
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016, Paolo Smiraglia wrote:
Hi all!
My name is Paolo and I'm the sysadmin of the research group (infosec)
where I work.
Recently our infrastructure was updated and I'm planning to use oVirt
as virtualisation manager. The new "toys" they gave me are
- HP DL360G9 (x2)
- HP MSA1040 (double controller with mini SAS connection)
By exploring the oVIrt documentation, seems that the best solution for
storage management would be having something like NSF, iSCSI and so
on. Unfortunately, LUNs exposed by our MSA1040 are recognised by the
two DL36G9 as directly-attached SCSI devices.
I asked Google and I found this old post from the far 2013
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017924.html
that seems to be very similar to my case and the scenario is not rosy... :-(
Is now, in 2016, something changed? Have you something to suggest?
11:41 a.m.
Thank you Nir and Rik for your hints! I'll check them soon.
Bests,
Paolo
On 04/09/2016 09:03 PM, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi Paolo,
If your storage is detected by multipathd as a multipath capable device
(it should, even if connected through only one connection), oVirt will
detect it as "fibre channel" storage and selecting that as the storage
type should work.
We use a similar setup (with Dell powervault storage) and haven't had
any problems with it.
Regards,
Rik
--
PAOLO SMIRAGLIA
3147
days inactive
3149
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Nir Soffer -
Paolo Smiraglia -
Rik Theys