I am working on integrating a backup solution for our ovirt environment and having issues with the time it takes to backup the VM's. This backup solution is simply taking a snapshot and making a clone and backing the clone up to a backup server. A VM that is 100 gig takes 52 minutes to back up. The same VM doing a file backup using the same product, and bypassing their rhv plugin, takes 14 minutes. So the throughput is there but the ovirt imageio-proxy process seems to be what manages how images are uploaded and is officially my bottle neck. Load is not high on the engine or kvm hosts. I had bumped up the Upload image size from 100MB to 10gig weeks ago and that didn't seem to help. [root@blah-lab-engine ~]# engine-config -a |grep Upload UploadImageChunkSizeKB: 10240000 version: general [root@bgl-vms-engine ~]# rpm -qa |grep ovirt-image ovirt-imageio-proxy-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch ovirt-imageio-common-1.4.6-1.el7.x86_64 ovirt-imageio-proxy-setup-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch I have seen bugs reported to redhat about this but I am running above the affected releases. engine software is 4.2.8.2-1.el7 Any idea what we can tweak to open up this bottleneck?
Hello, We have the same problem. It's seems that the ovirt-imageio-proxy is the bottleneck for our setup. We use vprotect to backup a VM via api We ask for support with vprotect team and we are currently tunning some parameters on the kernel. We have full 10G network in ou setup. Here is the kernel parameter that we set. Did you manage to progress on the speed process ? # Maximum receive socket buffer size net.core.rmem_max = 134217728 # Maximum send socket buffer size net.core.wmem_max = 134217728 # Minimum, initial and max TCP Receive buffer size in Bytes net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 134217728 # Minimum, initial and max buffer space allocated net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 134217728 # Maximum number of packets queued on the input side net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 300000 # Auto tuning net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf =1 # Don't cache ssthresh from previous connection net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1 # The Hamilton TCP (HighSpeed-TCP) algorithm is a packet loss based congestion control and is more aggressive pushing up to max bandwidth (total BDP) and favors hosts with lower TTL / VARTTL. net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=htcp # If you are using jumbo frames set this to avoid MTU black holes. net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing = 1
ovirt-engine-4.2.8.2-1.el7.noarch ovirt-imageio-proxy-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch ovirt-imageio-daemon-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:13 AM Dev Ops <sipandbite@hotmail.com> wrote:
I am working on integrating a backup solution for our ovirt environment and having issues with the time it takes to backup the VM's. This backup solution is simply taking a snapshot and making a clone and backing the clone up to a backup server.
A VM that is 100 gig takes 52 minutes to back up. The same VM doing a file backup using the same product, and bypassing their rhv plugin, takes 14 minutes. So the throughput is there but the ovirt imageio-proxy process seems to be what manages how images are uploaded and is officially my bottle neck. Load is not high on the engine or kvm hosts.
I had bumped up the Upload image size from 100MB to 10gig weeks ago and
that didn't seem to help.
[root@blah-lab-engine ~]# engine-config -a |grep Upload UploadImageChunkSizeKB: 10240000 version: general
This will not help, 100 MiB should be big enough. [root@bgl-vms-engine ~]# rpm -qa |grep ovirt-image
ovirt-imageio-proxy-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch ovirt-imageio-common-1.4.6-1.el7.x86_64 ovirt-imageio-proxy-setup-1.4.6-1.el7.noarch
I have seen bugs reported to redhat about this but I am running above the affected releases.
engine software is 4.2.8.2-1.el7
Any idea what we can tweak to open up this bottleneck?
The proxy is not meant to be used for backup and restore. It was created to allow easy upload or download from the UI. For backup application you should use upload and download directly from the host. When you create an image transfer, you should use the image transfer "transfer_url" instead of the "proxy_url". When you upload or download directly from the host, you can take advantage of keep alive connections and fast zero support. If your upload or download program is running on the host, you can take advantage of unix socket support for even faster transfers. For upload, you should use ovirt_imageio_common.client module, using all available features: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-imageio/blob/master/examples/upload The client does not provide a easy to use helper for download yet. A future version will provide download helper. Please see the documentation: http://ovirt.github.io/ovirt-imageio/random-io.html http://ovirt.github.io/ovirt-imageio/unix-socket.html And SDK examples: https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/blob/master/sdk/examples/upload_di... https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/blob/master/sdk/examples/download_... If direct download is still too slow, please file a bug and provide logs imageio daemon logs. Nir
Perhaps it will help future sysadmins will learn from my mistake. I also saw very poor upload speeds (~30MB/s) no matter what I tried. I went through the whole route with unix-sockets and whatnot. But, in the end, it just turned out that the glusterfs itself was the bottleneck; abysmal performance for small block sizes. I found the list of suggested performance tweaks that RHEL suggests. In particular, it was the "network.remote-dio=on" setting that made all the difference. Almost 10x faster. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.1/ht...
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:54 PM Mikael Öhman <micketeer@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps it will help future sysadmins will learn from my mistake. I also saw very poor upload speeds (~30MB/s) no matter what I tried. I went through the whole route with unix-sockets and whatnot.
But, in the end, it just turned out that the glusterfs itself was the bottleneck; abysmal performance for small block sizes.
What do you mean by "small block sizes"? I found the list of suggested performance tweaks that RHEL suggests. In
particular, it was the "network.remote-dio=on" setting that made all the difference. Almost 10x faster.
Note that network.remote-dio is not the recommended configuration for ovirt, in particular if on hyperconverge setup when it can be harmful by delaying sanlock I/O. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/4a9b28aac48870343c5ea4d1e83a63c10a1... (Patch in discussion) Nir
What do you mean by "small block sizes"?
inside a VM, or directly on the mounted glusterfs; dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpfile bs=1M count=100 oflag=direct of course, a terrible way to write data, but also things like compiling software inside one of the VMs was terrible slow, 5-10x slower than hardware, consisting of almost only idling. Uploading disk images never got above 30MB/s. (and I did try all options i could find; using upload_disk.py on one of the hosts, even through a unix socket or with -d option, tweaking buffer size, all of which made no difference). Adding an NFS volume and uploading to it I reach +200MB/s. I tried tuning a few parameters on glusterfs but saw no improvements until I got to network.remote-dio, which made everything listed above really fast.
Note that network.remote-dio is not the recommended configuration for ovirt, in particular if on hyperconverge setup when it can be harmful by delaying sanlock I/O.
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/4a9b28aac48870343c5ea4d1e83a63c1... (Patch in discussion)
Oh, I had seen this page, thanks. Is "remote-dio=enabled" harmful as in things breaking, or just worse performance? I was a bit reluctant to turn it on, but after seeing it was part of the virt group I thought it must have been safe. Perhaps some of the other options like "performance.strict-o-direct on" would solve my performance issues in a nicer way (I will test it out first thing on monday) Thanks (I'm not much of a filesystem guy, thanks for putting up with my ignorance)
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 8:37 PM Mikael Öhman <micketeer@gmail.com> wrote:
What do you mean by "small block sizes"?
inside a VM, or directly on the mounted glusterfs; dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpfile bs=1M count=100 oflag=direct of course, a terrible way to write data, but also things like compiling software inside one of the VMs was terrible slow, 5-10x slower than hardware, consisting of almost only idling.
Uploading disk images never got above 30MB/s. (and I did try all options i could find; using upload_disk.py on one of the hosts, even through a unix socket or with -d option, tweaking buffer size, all of which made no difference). Adding an NFS volume and uploading to it I reach +200MB/s.
I tried tuning a few parameters on glusterfs but saw no improvements until I got to network.remote-dio, which made everything listed above really fast.
Note that network.remote-dio is not the recommended configuration for ovirt, in particular if on hyperconverge setup when it can be harmful by delaying sanlock I/O.
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/4a9b28aac48870343c5ea4d1e83a63c1. ..
(Patch in discussion)
Oh, I had seen this page, thanks. Is "remote-dio=enabled" harmful as in things breaking, or just worse performance?
I think the issue is delayed writes to storage until you call fsync() on the node. The kernel may try to flush too much data, which may cause delays in other processes. Many years ago we had such issues that cause sanlock failures in renewing leases, which can end in terminating vdsm. This is the reason we always use direct I/O when copying disks. If you have hypervonvrged setup and use network.remote-dio you may have the same problems. Sahina worked on a bug that was related to network.remote-dio, I hope she can add more details.
I was a bit reluctant to turn it on, but after seeing it was part of the virt group I thought it must have been safe.
I think it should be safe for general virt usage, but you may need to tweak some host settings to avoid large delays when using fsync().
Perhaps some of the other options like "performance.strict-o-direct on" would solve my performance issues in a nicer way (I will test it out first thing on monday)
This is not likely to improve performance, but it is seems to be required if you use network.remote-dio = off. Without it direct I/O does not behave in a predictable way and may cause failures in qemu, vdsm and ovirt-imageio. Nir
fre 2019-09-13 klockan 12:52 +0000 skrev Mikael Öhman:
Perhaps it will help future sysadmins will learn from my mistake. I also saw very poor upload speeds (~30MB/s)
Bits and bytes man :) /K
no matter what I tried. I went through the whole route with unix- sockets and whatnot.
But, in the end, it just turned out that the glusterfs itself was the bottleneck; abysmal performance for small block sizes.
I found the list of suggested performance tweaks that RHEL suggests. In particular, it was the "network.remote-dio=on" setting that made all the difference. Almost 10x faster.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage /3.1/html/configuring_red_hat_enterprise_virtualization_with_red_hat_ gluster_storage/chap- hosting_virtual_machine_images_on_red_hat_storage_volumes _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/communit y-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/ message/F657ZJ32EYON4X5FAE2BQAHDI4LV5D36/
участники (5)
-
Dev Ops -
Karli Sjöberg -
Mikael Öhman -
Nir Soffer -
Punaatua PK