2:32 a.m.
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
Thank you,
Laszlo
3:31 a.m.
Some comments:
1. I think the amount of time between tests should be configurable.
2. I guess some of the actions done by the autorecovery process should be monitored, so
take a look at
"http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/TaskManagerDetailed#Job_for_System_Monitors"
in order to monitor this action.
Oved
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:32:34 PM
Subject: [Users] Autorecovery feature plan for review
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
Thank you,
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3:39 a.m.
On 02/13/2012 01:31 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
Some comments:
1. I think the amount of time between tests should be configurable.
2. I guess some of the actions done by the autorecovery process should be monitored, so
take a look at
"http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/TaskManagerDetailed#Job_for_System_Monitors"
in order to monitor this action.
We plan to insert monitoring at phase2.
Oved
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
> To: "engine-devel" <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:32:34 PM
> Subject: [Users] Autorecovery feature plan for review
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
>
> Thank you,
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
2:03 a.m.
On 02/13/2012 01:39 PM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote:
On 02/13/2012 01:31 PM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
> Some comments:
> 1. I think the amount of time between tests should be configurable.
> 2. I guess some of the actions done by the autorecovery process should be monitored,
so take a look at
"http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/TaskManagerDetailed#Job_for_System_Monitors"
in order to monitor this action.
We plan to insert monitoring at phase2.
The design has no phases.
Y.
> Oved
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Laszlo Hornyak"<lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "engine-devel"<engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, users(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 12:32:34 PM
>> Subject: [Users] Autorecovery feature plan for review
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Laszlo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
7:56 p.m.
New subject: [Users] [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
preferred behavior?
10:57 p.m.
New subject: [Users] [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
preferred behavior?
I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to maintain
current behavior.
I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
Engine-devel(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
10:59 p.m.
New subject: [Users] [Engine-devel] Autorecovery feature plan for review
On 02/14/2012 08:57 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 14/02/12 05:56, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 12:32 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review the plan document for autorecovery.
>> http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Autorecovery
>
> why would we disable auto recovery by default? it sounds like the
> preferred behavior?
>
I think that by default Laszlo meant in the upgrade process to maintain
current behavior.
I agree that for new entities the default should be true.
i think the only combination which will allow this is for db to default
to false and code to default to true for this property?
4455
days inactive
4456
days old
6 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Itamar Heim -
Laszlo Hornyak -
Livnat Peer -
Oved Ourfalli -
Yair Zaslavsky -
Yaniv Kaul