8:42 p.m.
------=_NextPartTM-000-bc6c2d8a-f22f-48fd-9454-d0ef1b076f5c
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735FC31162EXCHANGEcollogi_"
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735FC31162EXCHANGEcollogi_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From
my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if
Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper
knowledge?
The reason I'm asking:
We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and enjoy the feature of live
merges. But with BZ1199182 (snapshot deletion bug) I guess we might
need newer libvirt builds. With virt-preview for FC20 no longer in
maintenance we would ony be on the save side with FC21.
Markus
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735FC31162EXCHANGEcollogi_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html dir=3D"ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style type=3D"text/css" id=3D"owaParaStyle"></style>
</head>
<body fpstyle=3D"1" ocsi=3D"0">
<div style=3D"direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: =
10pt;">Hi,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From=
</div>
<div>my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if</=
div>
<div>Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper=
</div>
<div>knowledge?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The reason I'm asking:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and enjoy the feature of l=
ive </div>
<div>merges. But with BZ1199182 (snapshot deletion bug) I guess we might</d=
iv>
<div>need newer libvirt builds. With virt-preview for FC20 no longer in&nbs=
p;</div>
<div>maintenance we would ony be on the save side with FC21.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Markus</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_12EF8D94C6F8734FB2FF37B9FBEDD1735FC31162EXCHANGEcollogi_--
------=_NextPartTM-000-bc6c2d8a-f22f-48fd-9454-d0ef1b076f5c
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="InterScan_Disclaimer.txt"
****************************************************************************
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail
irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
Über das Internet versandte E-Mails können unter fremden Namen erstellt oder
manipuliert werden. Deshalb ist diese als E-Mail verschickte Nachricht keine
rechtsverbindliche Willenserklärung.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
Vorstand:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Köln
Registernummer: HRB 52 497
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
e-mails sent over the internet may have been written under a wrong name or
been manipulated. That is why this message sent as an e-mail is not a
legally binding declaration of intention.
Collogia
Unternehmensberatung AG
Ubierring 11
D-50678 Köln
executive board:
Kadir Akin
Dr. Michael Höhnerbach
President of the supervisory board:
Hans Kristian Langva
Registry office: district court Cologne
Register number: HRB 52 497
****************************************************************************
------=_NextPartTM-000-bc6c2d8a-f22f-48fd-9454-d0ef1b076f5c--
10:02 a.m.
Il 16/03/2015 19:42, Markus Stockhausen ha scritto:
Hi,
back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From
my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if
Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper
knowledge?
The reason I'm asking:
We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and enjoy the feature of live
merges. But with BZ1199182 (snapshot deletion bug) I guess we might
need newer libvirt builds. With virt-preview for FC20 no longer in
maintenance we would ony be on the save side with FC21.
Markus
Hi Markus,
Dan Kenigsberg pushed changes to our automated build system for building VDSM on Fedora 21
for 3.5.
I've not checked if he finished the porting of the required components into
ovirt-3.5-snapshot, CCing him.
As far as I know, there's willing to support Fedora 22 in 3.6 but no plans to support
Fedora 21 either in 3.5 or in 3.6.
As hypervisor host Dan can tell you better about VDSM plans for supporting Fedora 21, but
I've not seen any feature proposal or bugs tracking the
effort in that direction.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
12:40 a.m.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:02:54AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il 16/03/2015 19:42, Markus Stockhausen ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> back in december there was a discussion about Ovirt on Fedora 21. From
> my point of view that was about ovirt engine. So I'm somehow lost if
> Fedora 21 is at least supported as hypervisor host. Anyone with deeper
> knowledge?
>
> The reason I'm asking:
>
> We are currently on FC20 + virt-preview and enjoy the feature of live
> merges. But with BZ1199182 (snapshot deletion bug) I guess we might
> need newer libvirt builds. With virt-preview for FC20 no longer in
> maintenance we would ony be on the save side with FC21.
>
> Markus
Hi Markus,
Dan Kenigsberg pushed changes to our automated build system for building VDSM on Fedora
21 for 3.5.
I've not checked if he finished the porting of the required components into
ovirt-3.5-snapshot, CCing him.
no, I did not touch any other package.
As far as I know, there's willing to support Fedora 22 in 3.6 but
no plans to support Fedora 21 either in 3.5 or in 3.6.
As hypervisor host Dan can tell you better about VDSM plans for supporting Fedora 21, but
I've not seen any feature proposal or bugs tracking the
effort in that direction.
Regardless of the ovirt builds
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/fc*/
vdsm is built as part of any Fedora release and should be fully
operational. The only problem is the amount of testing - and here you
are most welcome to assist: yum install vdsm on your f21, and see if it
flies. If you find a problem (be it a missing mom version or an
operational bug) please report it here on on bugzilla.
Dan.
12:08 p.m.
afaik el7.1 is supposed to support
live merge and will be longer supported.
centos 7.1 should come out "soon" (TM).
but it might take 3.5.2 or 3.5.3 to
fully support 7.1, but RH knows better than me :)
HTH
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +49-5772-293-100
F: +49-5772-293-333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
3538
days inactive
3539
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Markus Stockhausen -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Sven Kieske