[Users] oVirt has been approved for inclusion in Fedora 18

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030707040702020007010301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/170410.html :
* #913 F18 Feature: oVirt engine 3.1 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/oVirtEngine_3.1 (mmaslano, 17:20:45) * AGREED: oVirt is approved as a feature (+7,-0) (mmaslano, 17:23:49) --------------030707040702020007010301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> From <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> <a href="http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/170410.html">http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/170410.html</a> :<br> <br> * #913 F18 Feature: oVirt engine 3.1 -<br> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/oVirtEngine_3.1">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/oVirtEngine_3.1</a> (mmaslano,<br> 17:20:45)<br> * AGREED: oVirt is approved as a feature (+7,-0) (mmaslano, 17:23:49)<br> </body> </html> --------------030707040702020007010301--

Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch of people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its listed as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing packages. -- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY

On 08/02/2012 04:45 AM, Gary Scarborough wrote:
Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch of people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its listed as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing packages.
upgrade to 3.1 is planned. repo for web admin for fedora 18 is planned. getting the webadmin into fedora 18 is tbd, not sure the gwt dependencies can be resolved in time. so worst case you would need to install the UI from an ovirt repo
-- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad@gmail.com> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, 2 August, 2012 4:45:50 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt has been approved for inclusion in Fedora 18
Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch of people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its listed as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing packages.
If you tried oVirt 3.0 a few months ago on F16 - it worked very nicely (first time I tried to install it, it took me about 20 minutes). We are transitioning to F17 and oVirt3.1, and the transition is not very smooth (some packages in the repos are 3.1, others 3.0, and trying to install using binary packages doesn't work well because of this), but once 3.1 is released, things should settle down. And I hope for 3.2 the transition will be easier. What I'm saying is that the current state of things is not an oVirt as a product issue, but growing pains around the repositories. Inclusion in Fedora might help eliminate these in the future
-- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Regards, Dan Yasny Red Hat Israel +972 9769 2280
participants (4)
-
Dan Yasny
-
Gary Scarborough
-
Itamar Heim
-
Yaniv Kaul