1:14 a.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030707040702020007010301
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
* #913 F18 Feature: oVirt engine 3.1 -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/oVirtEngine_3.1 (mmaslano,
17:20:45)
* AGREED: oVirt is approved as a feature (+7,-0) (mmaslano, 17:23:49)
--------------030707040702020007010301
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
From
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a
href="http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-July/17041...
:<br>
<br>
* #913 F18 Feature: oVirt engine 3.1 -<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/oVirtEngine_3.1"&...;
(mmaslano,<br>
17:20:45)<br>
* AGREED: oVirt is approved as a feature (+7,-0) (mmaslano,
17:23:49)<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030707040702020007010301--
6:45 p.m.
Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch of
people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its listed
as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing packages.
--
Gary Scarborough
IST Lab Manager
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester NY
12:05 a.m.
On 08/02/2012 04:45 AM, Gary Scarborough wrote:
Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch
of
people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its
listed as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing packages.
upgrade to 3.1 is planned.
repo for web admin for fedora 18 is planned.
getting the webadmin into fedora 18 is tbd, not sure the gwt
dependencies can be resolved in time.
so worst case you would need to install the UI from an ovirt repo
--
Gary Scarborough
IST Lab Manager
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester NY
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
12:35 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad(a)gmail.com>
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, 2 August, 2012 4:45:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt has been approved for inclusion in Fedora 18
Will Ovirt actually work when included in Fedora 18? I know a bunch
of people who tried ovirt through fedora 17 and were ticked off. Its
listed as supported but doesn't actually work due to missing
packages.
If you tried oVirt 3.0 a few months ago on F16 - it worked very nicely (first time I tried
to install it, it took me about 20 minutes).
We are transitioning to F17 and oVirt3.1, and the transition is not very smooth (some
packages in the repos are 3.1, others 3.0, and trying to install using binary packages
doesn't work well because of this), but once 3.1 is released, things should settle
down. And I hope for 3.2 the transition will be easier.
What I'm saying is that the current state of things is not an oVirt as a product
issue, but growing pains around the repositories. Inclusion in Fedora might help eliminate
these in the future
--
Gary Scarborough
IST Lab Manager
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester NY
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Regards,
Dan Yasny
Red Hat Israel
+972 9769 2280
4285
days inactive
4286
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Dan Yasny -
Gary Scarborough -
Itamar Heim -
Yaniv Kaul