5:19 p.m.
Is this possible?
I have 3 hosts with each four physical interfaces.
On one of them, I have a vlan defined which I'd like to use for
ovirtmgmt. However, after installing the host, it says that the
ovirtmgmt network is missing on it and if I try to assign ovirtmgmt I
can only do it on the physical NIC's
Any ideas?
/tony
--
--
Tony Albers
Systems Architect
Systems Director, National Cultural Heritage Cluster
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316
8:24 p.m.
Technically, it is possible, I used to do it at the very beginning
but... if you can, the best practice is to dedicate a physical nic to
the ovirtmgmt network as a non-tagged vlan.
Imagine you install your node on an access port, then you want to add
bond, then the ovirtmgmt on a tagged vlan... each time you change your
port config to match to your node config, you can loose ssh connection
at any time.
Le 14/11/2018 à 15:19, Tony Brian Albers a écrit :
Is this possible?
I have 3 hosts with each four physical interfaces.
On one of them, I have a vlan defined which I'd like to use for
ovirtmgmt. However, after installing the host, it says that the
ovirtmgmt network is missing on it and if I try to assign ovirtmgmt I
can only do it on the physical NIC's
Any ideas?
/tony
--
Nathanaël Blanchet
Supervision réseau
Pôle Infrastrutures Informatiques
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14
blanchet(a)abes.fr
1:49 p.m.
Hi Nathanaël,
Yeah, I think I'll have to just use a physical NIC for the ovirtmgmt.
Too bad, it would be nice to be able to separate it from the standard
network.
/tony
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 18:24 +0100, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote:
Nathanaël
--
--
Tony Albers
Systems Architect
Systems Director, National Cultural Heritage Cluster
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316
3:11 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Tony Brian Albers <tba(a)kb.dk> wrote:
Hi Nathanaël,
Yeah, I think I'll have to just use a physical NIC for the ovirtmgmt.
Too bad, it would be nice to be able to separate it from the standard
network.
/tony
Actually in several environments I can use globally only 4 network
adapters, but they are all 10Gb/s.
So in this case is a shame to use a pair of them for ovirtmgmt only...
I use 2 of them in bonding (802.3ad) for ovirtmgmt and VMs, and 2 of them
for iSCSI, migration network and NFS access
The culprit is to pre-define the bond on the host and set ovrtmgmt as a
vlan based network with the vlan id that is necessary in your case.
Eg on one environment of these my vlan for ovirtmgmt is 68
In this case on the host there will be bond0 before setup and then after
setup they will be created bond0.68, bond0.65 interfaces and ovirtmgmt
bridge and vlan65 bridge
8: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 18:03:73:0d:e9:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
24: bond0.65@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
noqueue master vlan65 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 18:03:73:0d:e9:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
25: vlan65: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 18:03:73:0d:e9:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
26: bond0.68@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
noqueue master ovirtmgmt state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 18:03:73:0d:e9:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
27: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 18:03:73:0d:e9:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.4.192.32/24 brd 10.4.192.255 scope global ovirtmgmt
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
[root@ov200 ~]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
;vdsmdummy; 8000.000000000000 no
ovirtmgmt 8000.1803730de941 no bond0.68
vlan162 8000.a0369f2e1388 no p1p1.162
vlan65 8000.1803730de941 no bond0.65
vnet0
vnet2
vlan98 8000.a0369f2e138a no p1p2.98
vnet1
vnet3
[root@ov200 ~]
with the ovirtmgmt bridge on bond0.68 device
In another environment I have 4 interfaces and ovirtmgmt not set up as vlan
based, but I can configure the switch ports as trunk with vlan 187 enabled
and as default vlan set the 68 one, so that if packets are not tagged they
go through that vlan.
In this case on one host I have to preconfigure the bond0 and then at the
end of setup I will have something like this:
45: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
master ovirtmgmt state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether f4:e9:d4:d6:15:a0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
46: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether f4:e9:d4:d6:15:a0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.4.192.47/24 brd 10.4.192.255 scope global ovirtmgmt
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::f6e9:d4ff:fed6:15a0/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
47: bond0.187@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether f4:e9:d4:d6:15:a0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.4.187.102/24 brd 10.4.187.255 scope global bond0.187
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
48: bond0.65@bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
noqueue master vlan65 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether f4:e9:d4:d6:15:a0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
49: vlan65: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state
UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether f4:e9:d4:d6:15:a0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
and
# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
;vdsmdummy; 8000.000000000000 no
ovirtmgmt 8000.f4e9d4d615a0 no bond0
vlan65 8000.f4e9d4d615a0 no bond0.65
vnet0
vnet1
So the ovirtmgmt bridge is on bond0 and the VM dedicated bridge (vlan65) is
on bond0.65
And on bond0.187 I have the ip dedicated to live migration.
The important thing is to presetup the bond and make the right choice at
the beginning about ovirtmgmt, if you want ovirtmgmt vlan based or not.
And also configure accordingly the switch ports, of course.
HIH,
Gianluca
10:56 a.m.
I changed from non-vlan to vlan on our systems which are all ovirt node installs, you need
access to the nodes/hosts that doesn't use the ovirtmgmt network ( another
interface/KVM/console). I believe it was /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf/nets/ovirtmgmt
I edited then restarted the neworking.
Regards,
Paul S.
________________________________________
From: Tony Brian Albers <tba(a)kb.dk>
Sent: 15 November 2018 10:49
To: blanchet(a)abes.fr; users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: using vlan-tagged nic for ovirtmgmt
Hi Nathanaël,
Yeah, I think I'll have to just use a physical NIC for the ovirtmgmt.
Too bad, it would be nice to be able to separate it from the standard
network.
/tony
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 18:24 +0100, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote:
Nathanaël
--
--
Tony Albers
Systems Architect
Systems Director, National Cultural Heritage Cluster
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/32T2SUNDSS4...
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to:-
http://disclaimer.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.html
3:43 p.m.
Thanks guys.
That is awesome info, I’ll see if I can make it work
/tony
Sent from my iPhone
On 15 Nov 2018, at 13.31, Staniforth, Paul
<P.Staniforth(a)leedsbeckett.ac.uk> wrote:
I changed from non-vlan to vlan on our systems which are all ovirt node installs, you
need access to the nodes/hosts that doesn't use the ovirtmgmt network ( another
interface/KVM/console). I believe it was /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf/nets/ovirtmgmt
I edited then restarted the neworking.
Regards,
Paul S.
________________________________________
From: Tony Brian Albers <tba(a)kb.dk>
Sent: 15 November 2018 10:49
To: blanchet(a)abes.fr; users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: using vlan-tagged nic for ovirtmgmt
Hi Nathanaël,
Yeah, I think I'll have to just use a physical NIC for the ovirtmgmt.
Too bad, it would be nice to be able to separate it from the standard
network.
/tony
> On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 18:24 +0100, Nathanaël Blanchet wrote:
> Nathanaël
--
--
Tony Albers
Systems Architect
Systems Director, National Cultural Heritage Cluster
Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/32T2SUNDSS4...
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to:-
http://disclaimer.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.html
2013
days inactive
2015
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Gianluca Cecchi -
Nathanaël Blanchet -
Staniforth, Paul -
Tony Brian Albers