Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN
Hello, In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails. This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy. In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already. Thanks Fernando
Dan, Edy, Could you guys answer this? IIUC, the requirements are: - stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond - be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback - have redundancy - assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Fernando Frediani <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN To: users@ovirt.org Hello, In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails. This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy. In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already. Thanks Fernando _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <yzaspits@redhat.com> wrote:
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
- stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond - be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback - have redundancy - assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Fernando Frediani <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN To: users@ovirt.org
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.
This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.
In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.
Thanks
Fernando
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Fernando, As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported. The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit. With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet. Thanks, Edy.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060804090703060803060201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the reply. Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that simplify the things a lot. Thanks Fernando Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <yzaspits@redhat.com <mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com>> wrote:
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
* stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond * be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback * have redundancy * assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Fernando Frediani* <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br <mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br>> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.
This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.
In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.
Thanks
Fernando
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Fernando,
As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported. The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit.
With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.
Thanks, Edy.
--------------060804090703060803060201 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Thanks for the reply.<br> <br> Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that simplify the things a lot.<br> <br> Thanks<br> Fernando<br> <br> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:<br> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CALmkdFTCJdpeEKGe0qE4O9x+yik24UOraMJRfEDLos9bByacmA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr"><br> <div class="gmail_extra"><br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com">yzaspits@redhat.com</a></a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr"> <div>Dan, Edy,<br> <br> Could you guys answer this?<br> <br> </div> IIUC, the requirements are:<br> <ul> <li>stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond</li> <li>be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback<br> </li> <li>have redundancy</li> <li>assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)<br> </li> </ul> <div> <div>I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?<br> </div> <div> <div> <div><br> <div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br> From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Fernando Frediani</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a></a>></span><br> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM<br> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN<br> To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">users@ovirt.org</a><br> <br> <br> Hello,<br> <br> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.<br> <br> This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.<br> <br> In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.<br> <br> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> <div><br> </div> <div> </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr"> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div class="gmail_quote"> Thanks<br> <br> Fernando<br> <br> _______________________________________________<br> Users mailing list<br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank">Users@ovirt.org</a><br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br> </div> <br> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Hello Fernando,<br> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported.<br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit.<br> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.<br> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,<br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Edy.<br> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_extra"><br> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------060804090703060803060201--
Le 27 juin 2016 =C3=A0 14:31, Fernando Frediani = <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br> a =C3=A9crit : =20 Thanks for the reply. =20 Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module = and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS = is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very = handy that simplify the things a lot. =20 Thanks Fernando =20 Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:
=20 =20 On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky < = <mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com>yzaspits@redhat.com = <mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com>> wrote: Dan, Edy, =20 Could you guys answer this? =20 IIUC, the requirements are: stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback have redundancy assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would = we be able to provide in any future? =20 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Fernando Frediani < = <mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br>fernando.frediani@upx.com.br = <mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br>> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per = VLAN To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> =20 =20 Hello, =20 In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each = Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the =
=20 This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available = and still have redundancy. =20 In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be =
=20 =20 =20 Thanks =20 Fernando =20 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users = <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> =20 =20 Hello Fernando, =20 As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you = are looking for is not supported. The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, =
--Apple-Mail=_C94BBAD9-CF4E-4EF0-8F61-197B7219C318 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ? [1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/ physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily = and which stays as secondary(bond mode=3D1 equivalent). So for certain = VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic = flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual = Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other = should a cable or switch fails. possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess = it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has = done this already. providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for = throughput beyond the one link limit.
=20 With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking = infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements = some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet. =20 Thanks, Edy. =20 =20 =20
Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_C94BBAD9-CF4E-4EF0-8F61-197B7219C318 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html = charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; = -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" = class=3D"">Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ?<div = class=3D""><br class=3D""><div class=3D"">[1] <a = href=3D"http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/" = class=3D"">http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/</a></div><di= v class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=3D""><br = class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=3D"">Le = 27 juin 2016 =C3=A0 14:31, Fernando Frediani <<a = href=3D"mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br" = class=3D"">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a>> a =C3=A9crit :</div><br = class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""> =20 <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8" = http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" class=3D""> =20 <div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" class=3D""> Thanks for the reply.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that simplify the things a lot.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Thanks<br class=3D""> Fernando<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <div class=3D"moz-cite-prefix">Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:<br class=3D""> </div> <blockquote = cite=3D"mid:CALmkdFTCJdpeEKGe0qE4O9x+yik24UOraMJRfEDLos9bByacmA@mail.gmail= .com" type=3D"cite" class=3D""> <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""><br class=3D""> <div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <span dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""><<a = moz-do-not-send=3D"true" href=3D"mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com" = target=3D"_blank" class=3D""></a><a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" = href=3D"mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com">yzaspits@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=3D""> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px = 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""> <div class=3D"">Dan, Edy,<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Could you guys answer this?<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> IIUC, the requirements are:<br class=3D""> <ul class=3D""> <li class=3D"">stream the traffic of few VLANs(network = roles) through a single bond</li> <li class=3D"">be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave = with an option of fallback<br class=3D""> </li> <li class=3D"">have redundancy</li> <li class=3D"">assign different QoS to every VLAN (my = addition)<br class=3D""> </li> </ul> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D"">I guess this is a new RFC that we do = not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?<br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D""><br class=3D""> <div class=3D"gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br class=3D""> From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Fernando Frediani</b> <span dir=3D"ltr" = class=3D""><<a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" = href=3D"mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D""></a><a class=3D"moz-txt-link-abbreviated" = href=3D"mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br<= /a>></span><br class=3D""> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM<br = class=3D""> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN<br class=3D""> To: <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" = href=3D"mailto:users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">users@ovirt.org</a><br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Hello,<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=3D1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.<br = class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> <div class=3D""><br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D""> </div> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px = 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D""> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D""> <div class=3D"gmail_quote"> Thanks<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> Fernando<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> _______________________________________________<br class=3D""> Users mailing list<br class=3D""> <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" = href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a><br class=3D""> <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true" = href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel=3D"noreferrer" = target=3D"_blank" = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br = class=3D""> </div> <br class=3D""> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">Hello Fernando,<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported.<br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">Thanks,<br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra">Edy.<br class=3D""> <br class=3D""> </div> <div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br class=3D""> </div> _______________________________________________<br class=3D"">Users = mailing list<br class=3D""><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org" = class=3D"">Users@ovirt.org</a><br = class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br = class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br = class=3D""></div></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail=_C94BBAD9-CF4E-4EF0-8F61-197B7219C318--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020307040000010903080703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Well, yes. That's actually the name VMware uses. If it bring similar functionalities then that's the solution. Thanks for sharing. looks pretty intresting. Fernando Em 27/06/2016 09:39, Fabrice Bacchella escreveu:
Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ?
[1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/
Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br <mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br>> a écrit :
Thanks for the reply.
Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that simplify the things a lot.
Thanks Fernando
Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <yzaspits@redhat.com> wrote:
Dan, Edy,
Could you guys answer this?
IIUC, the requirements are:
* stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond * be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback * have redundancy * assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)
I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Fernando Frediani* <fernando.frediani@upx.com.br> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>
Hello,
In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.
This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.
In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.
Thanks
Fernando
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello Fernando,
As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported. The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit.
With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.
Thanks, Edy.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--------------020307040000010903080703 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Well, yes. That's actually the name VMware uses.<br> <br> If it bring similar functionalities then that's the solution. Thanks for sharing. looks pretty intresting.<br> <br> Fernando<br> <br> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Em 27/06/2016 09:39, Fabrice Bacchella escreveu:<br> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:DCB689B5-9CEA-4C41-B952-BE40CC824052@icloud.com" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ? <div class=""><br class=""> <div class="">[1] <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/" class="">http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/</a></div> <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class=""><br class=""> <div> <blockquote type="cite" class=""> <div class="">Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br" class="">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a>> a écrit :</div> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> <div class=""> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" class=""> <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class=""> Thanks for the reply.<br class=""> <br class=""> Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that simplify the things a lot.<br class=""> <br class=""> Thanks<br class=""> Fernando<br class=""> <br class=""> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu:<br class=""> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:CALmkdFTCJdpeEKGe0qE4O9x+yik24UOraMJRfEDLos9bByacmA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite" class=""> <div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""> <div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""> <div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:yzaspits@redhat.com">yzaspits@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr" class=""> <div class="">Dan, Edy,<br class=""> <br class=""> Could you guys answer this?<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> IIUC, the requirements are:<br class=""> <ul class=""> <li class="">stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond</li> <li class="">be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback<br class=""> </li> <li class="">have redundancy</li> <li class="">assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition)<br class=""> </li> </ul> <div class=""> <div class="">I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be able to provide in any future?<br class=""> </div> <div class=""> <div class=""> <div class=""><br class=""> <div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br class=""> From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Fernando Frediani</b> <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fernando.frediani@upx.com.br">fernando.frediani@upx.com.br</a></a>></span><br class=""> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM<br class=""> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN<br class=""> To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:users@ovirt.org" target="_blank" class="">users@ovirt.org</a><br class=""> <br class=""> <br class=""> Hello,<br class=""> <br class=""> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch fails.<br class=""> <br class=""> This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still have redundancy.<br class=""> <br class=""> In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this already.<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> <div class=""><br class=""> </div> <div class=""> </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div dir="ltr" class=""> <div class=""> <div class=""> <div class=""> <div class=""> <div class="gmail_quote"> Thanks<br class=""> <br class=""> Fernando<br class=""> <br class=""> _______________________________________________<br class=""> Users mailing list<br class=""> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" target="_blank" class="">Users@ovirt.org</a><br class=""> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br class=""> </div> <br class=""> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Hello Fernando,<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are looking for is not supported.<br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond the one link limit.<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special functionality, but ovs is not in yet.<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Thanks,<br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra">Edy.<br class=""> <br class=""> </div> <div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br class=""> </div> _______________________________________________<br class=""> Users mailing list<br class=""> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org" class="">Users@ovirt.org</a><br class=""> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br class=""> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br class=""> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------020307040000010903080703--
participants (4)
-
Edward Haas -
Fabrice Bacchella -
Fernando Frediani -
Yevgeny Zaspitsky