Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
+1 for OpenvSwitch easy integration. Thank you! Best, Latcho -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces@ovirt.org [mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Alan Murrell Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:40 AM To: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily) _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
+1 for that one too. Am 26.02.2014 05:39, schrieb Alan Murrell:
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" <S.Kieske@mittwald.de> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:08:45 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
+1 for that one too.
Am 26.02.2014 05:39, schrieb Alan Murrell:
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
Does this mean making simpler the integration with Neutron that is currently allowing to use OpenvSwitch or does this call for direct use of ovs?
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi： oVirt users. Big data is very popular. Like VMware and OpenStack both of them support hadoop cluster. like: http://www.vmware.com/cn/products/vsphere/features/big-data.html https://launchpad.net/savanna Why not we not thinking? Thanks. 2014-02-26 17:18 GMT+08:00 Antoni Segura Puimedon <asegurap@redhat.com>:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" <S.Kieske@mittwald.de> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:08:45 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
+1 for that one too.
Am 26.02.2014 05:39, schrieb Alan Murrell:
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
Does this mean making simpler the integration with Neutron that is currently allowing to use OpenvSwitch or does this call for direct use of ovs?
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad
Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- 独立之思想，自由之精神。 --陈寅恪
Hi 适兕, Can you please describe the use case you have for big data? Usually version planning is done by users' needs. The more users need data the more chance we can invest the time in it (assuming there are no technical issues here). ----- Original Message -----
From: "适兕" <lijiangsheng1@gmail.com> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:32:37 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
Hi： oVirt users.
Big data is very popular. Like VMware and OpenStack both of them support hadoop cluster. like: http://www.vmware.com/cn/products/vsphere/features/big-data.html https://launchpad.net/savanna
Why not we not thinking?
Thanks.
2014-02-26 17:18 GMT+08:00 Antoni Segura Puimedon < asegurap@redhat.com > :
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" < S.Kieske@mittwald.de > To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:08:45 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
+1 for that one too.
Am 26.02.2014 05:39, schrieb Alan Murrell:
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
Does this mean making simpler the integration with Neutron that is currently allowing to use OpenvSwitch or does this call for direct use of ovs?
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- 独立之思想，自由之精神。 --陈寅恪
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Dear All, With your permission I will elaborate more on OpenvSwitch integration. I will try briefly to share with you my experience. My university uses MS Windows Active directory 2008R2 with several domains dedicated to connect staff computers, computer labs, users private devices, different types of users etc. I have test environment (CentOS 6 based) for my colleagues in the office. It was built by 6 machines: 1. engine, recently upgraded to ver. 3.3.3, connected to Active Directory, serves also ISO NFS domain; 2. Data center 1 - with two nodes - one of nodes serves also iSCSI storage domain; 3. Data center 2 - with two nodes; 4. Regular PC - serves as iSCSI storage domain for Data center 2 Since Ovirt ver. 3.1 no longer I have physical machine installed with Windows. For my daily Windows related routine tasks I am using virtual MS Windows 7 Enterprise machine joined to university Active Directory. In order to make my colleagues life easy I have created several templates with different distributions. What was reaction of my colleagues when I encouraged them to experiment with the new environment? My colleagues told me - everything is fine for experimenting but we need NAT network in order to make test setups of experimental MS Windows domain, Active Directory, Exchange servers etc. We do not want to mess with current production environment. This is going to be a problem if we decide to offer to students such experimental environment in educational process - classes for system unix/linux/windows administration, examples for cloud computing etc. I am still testing with OpenvSwitch integration in order to find solution for such case. To be honest with you - no luck yet. If the integration with OpenStack is better supported - I think it will be much easier to create safe environments for testing and experimenting. Please excuse me for this long e-mail. Thank you! Best, Latcho -- Latchezar Filtchev American University in Bulgaria Director Office of Communications 1 G.Izmirliev - Makednocheto sq. and Computing 2700 Blagoevgrad e-mail: latcho@aubg.bg Bulgaria Direct: +359 (73) 888346 Assistant: +359 (73) 888333 Fax: +359 (73) 888188 -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces@ovirt.org [mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of Antoni Segura Puimedon Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:18 AM To: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning ----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Kieske" <S.Kieske@mittwald.de> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:08:45 AM Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt 3.5 planning
+1 for that one too.
Am 26.02.2014 05:39, schrieb Alan Murrell:
This may be more of a 4.0 feature, but my vote goes for integration of OpenvSwitch (or least an option to add it easily)
Does this mean making simpler the integration with Neutron that is currently allowing to use OpenvSwitch or does this call for direct use of ovs?
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 04:18 -0500, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
Does this mean making simpler the integration with Neutron that is currently allowing to use OpenvSwitch or does this call for direct use of ovs?
I was thinking direct use, as in being able to setup a vSwitch (to use VMware terminology) and be able to do proper VLAN trunking all from within the oVirt/RHEV interface. -Alan
participants (6)
-
Alan Murrell -
Antoni Segura Puimedon -
Doron Fediuck -
Latchezar Filtchev -
Sven Kieske -
适兕