1:18 p.m.
Hello,
how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted engine and
leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is the
correct mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?
Thanks,
Gianluca
11:54 a.m.
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted engine and
leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is the correct
mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?
The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before upgrading them.
This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.
With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
So you should do something like this:
1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
engine and its vm)
2. Shutdown all other VMs
3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it
might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps
this might be required for vdsm. So:
4. Set local maintenance
5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, perhaps
better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen
automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see
that it worked.
6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
7. Start HA services
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
are still set.
9. Set maintenance to none
10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide
to start engine vm and should succeed.
11. Start all other VMs.
Didn't try this myself.
Best,
--
Didi
7:31 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
> During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted engine and
> leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is the
correct
> mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?
The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before upgrading
them.
This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.
With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
So you should do something like this:
1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
engine and its vm)
2. Shutdown all other VMs
3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it
might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps
this might be required for vdsm. So:
4. Set local maintenance
5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, perhaps
better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen
automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see
that it worked.
6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
7. Start HA services
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
are still set.
9. Set maintenance to none
10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide
to start engine vm and should succeed.
11. Start all other VMs.
Didn't try this myself.
Best,
--
Didi
Hello Didi,
I would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small different lab
environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.
They are both single host environments with self hosted engine.
One is 4.0.2 and the other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2
I plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4
One note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided by the
host itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, main data
domain and iso storage domain).
I customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of the server and
to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something has to be done
for stop too?
1) In /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
added in section [Unit]
After=nfs-server.service
The file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this
2) also in vdsmd.service changed
from:
After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service \
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service
to:
After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service \
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service \
nfs-server.service
Do you think any order setup I have to put in place related to NFS service
and oVirt services stop?
10:09 p.m.
--Apple-Mail=_E551DCFC-50E2-4FC1-9416-B1200B5AA19F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Hi Gianluca,
Instead of editing the system's built in systemd configuration, you can =
do the following...
Create a file called /etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
# My custom ovirt-ha-broker.service config that ensures NFS starts =
before ovirt-ha-broker.service
# thanks Gervais for this tip! :-)
.include /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
[Unit]
After=3Dnfs-server.service
Then disable and enable ovirt-ha-broker.service (systemctl disable =
ovirt-ha-broker.service ; systemctl enable ovirt-ha-broker.service) and =
you should see that it is using your customized systemd unit definition. =
You can see that systemd is using your file by running systemctl status =
ovirt-ha-broker.service. You'll see something like "Loaded: loaded =
(/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service;" in the output.
Your file will survive updates and therefore always wait for nfs to =
start prior to starting. You can do the same for your other =
customizations.
Cheers,
Gervais
On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gianluca Cecchi =
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
=20
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com =
<mailto:didi@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com <mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
> how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
> During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted =
engine and
> leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is
the =
correct
> mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?
=20
The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before =
upgrading them.
=20
This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.
=20
With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
=20
So you should do something like this:
=20
1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
engine and its vm)
2. Shutdown all other VMs
3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it
might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps
this might be required for vdsm. So:
4. Set local maintenance
5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, perhaps
better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen
automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see
that it worked.
6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
7. Start HA services
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
are still set.
9. Set maintenance to none
10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide
to start engine vm and should succeed.
11. Start all other VMs.
=20
Didn't try this myself.
=20
Best,
--
Didi
=20
Hello Didi,
I would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small different =
lab
environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.
They are both single host environments with self hosted engine.
One is 4.0.2 and the other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2
I plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4
=20
One note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided by =
the host
itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, main =
data domain and iso storage domain).
I customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of the
server =
and to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something has to =
be done for stop too?
=20
1) In /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
=20
added in section [Unit]
=20
After=3Dnfs-server.service
=20
The file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this
=20
2) also in vdsmd.service changed=20
from:
After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service =
rpcbind.service \
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service
=20
to:
After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service =
rpcbind.service \
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service \
nfs-server.service
=20
Do you think any order setup I have to put in place related to NFS =
service and
oVirt services stop?
=20
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_E551DCFC-50E2-4FC1-9416-B1200B5AA19F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dus-ascii"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" =
class=3D"">Hi Gianluca,<div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"">Instead of editing the system's built in systemd =
configuration, you can do the following...</div><div
class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Create a file called
=
/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service</div><div
class=3D""><br =
class=3D"webkit-block-placeholder"></div><blockquote
style=3D"margin: =
0px 0px 0px 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class=3D""><div =
class=3D""><font color=3D"#0433ff" class=3D""># My
=
custom ovirt-ha-broker.service config that ensures NFS starts =
before </font><span style=3D"color: rgb(4, 51, 255);" =
class=3D"">ovirt-ha-broker.service</span></div><div
class=3D""><span =
style=3D"color: rgb(4, 51, 255);" class=3D""># thanks Gervais for
this =
tip! :-)</span></div><div class=3D""><font
color=3D"#0433ff" =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></font></div><div
class=3D""><font =
color=3D"#0433ff" =
class=3D"">.include /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service</=
font></div><div class=3D""><font color=3D"#0433ff"
class=3D""><br =
class=3D""></font></div><div class=3D""><font
color=3D"#0433ff" =
class=3D"">[Unit]</font></div><div
class=3D""><font color=3D"#0433ff" =
class=3D"">After=3Dnfs-server.service</font></div></blockquote><div
=
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div>Then disable and =
enable ovirt-ha-broker.service (systemctl disable =
ovirt-ha-broker.service ; systemctl enable ovirt-ha-broker.service) and =
you should see that it is using your customized systemd unit definition. =
You can see that systemd is using your file by running systemctl status =
ovirt-ha-broker.service. You'll see something like "Loaded: loaded =
(/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service;" in the output.<div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"">Your file will survive =
updates and therefore always wait for nfs to start prior to starting. =
You can do the same for your other customizations.<br class=3D""><div
=
class=3D"">
<div id=3D"signature" class=3D""><br
class=3D"">Cheers,<br =
class=3D"">Gervais<br class=3D""><br
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div>
</div>
<br class=3D""><div><blockquote type=3D"cite"
class=3D""><div =
class=3D"">On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <<a =
href=3D"mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com" =
class=3D"">gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com</a>&gt;
wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div
dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D""><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div
class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, =
Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <span dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D""><<a href=3D"mailto:didi@redhat.com"
target=3D"_blank" =
class=3D"">didi(a)redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br
class=3D""><blockquote=
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px =
solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"gmail-">On
Sat, =
Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi<br class=3D"">
<<a href=3D"mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com" =
class=3D"">gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br
class=3D"">
> Hello,<br class=3D"">
> how do the two modes apply in case of single host?<br
class=3D"">
> During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted =
engine and<br class=3D"">
> leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is =
the correct<br class=3D"">
> mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?<br =
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
</span>The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before =
upgrading them.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.<br =
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.<br =
class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
So you should do something like this:<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the<br =
class=3D"">
engine and its vm)<br class=3D"">
2. Shutdown all other VMs<br class=3D"">
3. Shutdown engine vm from itself<br class=3D"">
At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it<br =
class=3D"">
might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps<br =
class=3D"">
this might be required for vdsm. So:<br class=3D"">
4. Set local maintenance<br class=3D"">
5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, =
perhaps<br class=3D"">
better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen<br =
class=3D"">
automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see<br =
class=3D"">
that it worked.<br class=3D"">
6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.<br class=3D"">
7. Start HA services<br class=3D"">
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint<br =
class=3D"">
are still set.<br class=3D"">
9. Set maintenance to none<br class=3D"">
10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide<br =
class=3D"">
to start engine vm and should succeed.<br class=3D"">
11. Start all other VMs.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Didn't try this myself.<br class=3D"">
<br class=3D"">
Best,<br class=3D"">
<span class=3D"gmail-HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"
class=3D"">--<br =
class=3D"">
Didi<br class=3D"">
</font></span></blockquote></div><br
class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">Hello Didi,</div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra">I =
would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small different lab =
environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">They are both single host environments with self =
hosted engine.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">One is 4.0.2 and the
=
other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I
=
plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra">One =
note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided by the =
host itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, main data =
domain and iso storage domain).</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I =
customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of the server and =
to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something has to be =
done for stop too?</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br =
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">1) In =
/usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">added in section [Unit]</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">After=3Dnfs-server.service</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra">The =
file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra">2) =
also in vdsmd.service changed </div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">from:</div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra"><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service =
iscsid.service rpcbind.service \</div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra"> =
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service =
vdsm-network.service</div></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br =
class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"gmail_extra">to:</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service =
iscsid.service rpcbind.service \<br class=3D""></div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">
=
supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service \</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_extra">
nfs-server.service</div><div =
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"">Do you think any order =
setup I have to put in place related to NFS service and oVirt services =
stop?</div></div><div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br class=3D"">Users =
mailing list<br class=3D""><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
=
class=3D"">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br =
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br =
class=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br
class=3D""></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_E551DCFC-50E2-4FC1-9416-B1200B5AA19F--
1:22 p.m.
Il 28/Set/2016 21:09, "Gervais de Montbrun" <gervais(a)demontbrun.com> ha
scritto:
Hi Gianluca,
Instead of editing the system's built in systemd configuration, you can
do the
following...
Create a file called /etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
> # My custom ovirt-ha-broker.service config that ensures NFS starts
before
ovirt-ha-broker.service
> # thanks Gervais for this tip! :-)
>
> .include /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
>
> [Unit]
> After=nfs-server.service
Then disable and enable ovirt-ha-broker.service (systemctl disable
ovirt-ha-broker.service ; systemctl enable ovirt-ha-broker.service) and you
should see that it is using your customized systemd unit definition. You
can see that systemd is using your file by running systemctl status
ovirt-ha-broker.service. You'll see something like "Loaded: loaded
(/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service;" in the output.
Your file will survive updates and therefore always wait for nfs to start
prior to
starting. You can do the same for your other customizations.
Cheers,
Gervais
> On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>> <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
>> > During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted engine
and
>> > leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok,
what is the
correct
>> > mode then to put host if I want finally to update it
too?
>>
>> The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before
upgrading
them.
>>
>> This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.
>>
>> With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
>>
>> So you should do something like this:
>>
>> 1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
>> engine and its vm)
>> 2. Shutdown all other VMs
>> 3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
>> At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it
>> might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps
>> this might be required for vdsm. So:
>> 4. Set local maintenance
>> 5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, perhaps
>> better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen
>> automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see
>> that it worked.
>> 6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
>> 7. Start HA services
>> 8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
>> are still set.
>> 9. Set maintenance to none
>> 10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide
>> to start engine vm and should succeed.
>> 11. Start all other VMs.
>>
>> Didn't try this myself.
>>
>> Best,
>> --
>> Didi
>
>
> Hello Didi,
> I would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small different
lab
environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.
> They are both single host environments with self hosted engine.
> One is 4.0.2 and the other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2
> I plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4
>
> One note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided by the
host
itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, main data
domain and iso storage domain).
> I customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of the
server
and to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something has to be
done for stop too?
>
> 1) In /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
>
> added in section [Unit]
>
> After=nfs-server.service
>
> The file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this
>
> 2) also in vdsmd.service changed
> from:
> After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service
\
> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service
>
> to:
> After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service
\
> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service vdsm-network.service \
> nfs-server.service
>
> Do you think any order setup I have to put in place related to NFS
service and
oVirt services stop?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Nice! I'm going to try and see.
Any particular dependency I should add for shutdown order due to the fact
that my host is also the NFS server providing data stores?
Do I need to set up nfs stop only after a particular ovirt related service?
Thanks,
Gianluca
10:41 p.m.
--Apple-Mail=_47811EC6-85A4-4378-9247-A576777E881E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Hi Gianluca,
I forgot to mention that you need to ensure that systemd knows that the =
new file exists. You should likely run `systemctl daemon-reload` after =
creating/modifying your custom systemd files. You can see that the After =
directive is combined from both files. Check it out by running =
`systemctl show vdsmd.service | grep After`
It makes sense to make further changes to ensure that NFS stops last, =
but I haven't looked into that yet.
:-)
Cheers,
Gervais
On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gianluca Cecchi =
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
=20
=20
Il 28/Set/2016 21:09, "Gervais de Montbrun" <gervais(a)demontbrun.com =
<mailto:gervais@demontbrun.com>> ha scritto:
>
> Hi Gianluca,
>
> Instead of editing the system's built in systemd configuration, you =
can
do the following...
>
> Create a file called /etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
>
>> # My custom ovirt-ha-broker.service config that ensures NFS starts =
before ovirt-ha-broker.service
>> # thanks Gervais for this tip! :-)
>>
>> .include /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
>>
>> [Unit]
>> After=3Dnfs-server.service
>
>
> Then disable and enable ovirt-ha-broker.service (systemctl disable =
ovirt-ha-broker.service ; systemctl enable ovirt-ha-broker.service) and =
you should see that it is using your customized systemd unit definition. =
You can see that systemd is using your file by running systemctl status =
ovirt-ha-broker.service. You'll see something like "Loaded: loaded =
(/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service;" in the output.
>
> Your file will survive updates and therefore always wait for nfs to =
start
prior to starting. You can do the same for your other =
customizations.
>
> Cheers,
> Gervais
>
>
>
>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gianluca Cecchi =
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com <mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David =
<didi(a)redhat.com
<mailto:didi@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>>> <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com <mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>> =
wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> > how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
>>> > During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted =
engine and
>>> > leaving global maintenance and having checked all
is ok, what is =
the correct
>>> > mode then to put host if I want finally to update
it too?
>>>
>>> The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before =
upgrading them.
>>>
>>> This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other =
hosts.
>>>
>>> With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
>>>
>>> So you should do something like this:
>>>
>>> 1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
>>> engine and its vm)
>>> 2. Shutdown all other VMs
>>> 3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
>>> At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But =
it
>>> might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not
sure but =
perhaps
>>> this might be required for vdsm. So:
>>> 4. Set local maintenance
>>> 5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, =
perhaps
>>> better stop also vdsm services. This stop should
obviously happen
>>> automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to =
see
>>> that it worked.
>>> 6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
>>> 7. Start HA services
>>> 8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global =
maint
>>> are still set.
>>> 9. Set maintenance to none
>>> 10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will =
decide
>>> to start engine vm and should succeed.
>>> 11. Start all other VMs.
>>>
>>> Didn't try this myself.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --
>>> Didi
>>
>>
>> Hello Didi,
>> I would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small =
different
lab environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.
>> They are both single host environments with self hosted
engine.
>> One is 4.0.2 and the other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2
>> I plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4
>>
>> One note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided =
by the
host itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, =
main data domain and iso storage domain).
>> I customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of
the =
server and to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something =
has to be done for stop too?
>>
>> 1) In /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service
>>
>> added in section [Unit]
>>
>> After=3Dnfs-server.service
>>
>> The file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this
>>
>> 2) also in vdsmd.service changed=20
>> from:
>> After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service =
rpcbind.service \
>> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service
vdsm-network.service
>>
>> to:
>> After=3Dmultipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service =
rpcbind.service \
>> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service
vdsm-network.service \
>> nfs-server.service
>>
>> Do you think any order setup I have to put in place related to NFS =
service and oVirt services stop?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users =
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>
=20
Nice! I'm going to try and see.
Any particular dependency I should add for shutdown order due to the =
fact that my
host is also the NFS server providing data stores?
Do I need to set up nfs stop only after a particular ovirt related =
service?
Thanks,
Gianluca
--Apple-Mail=_47811EC6-85A4-4378-9247-A576777E881E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body
style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break:
after-white-space;" class=""><div dir="auto"
style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break:
after-white-space;" class="">Hi Gianluca,<div
class=""><br class=""></div><div
class="">I forgot to mention that you need to ensure that systemd knows that
the new file exists. You should likely run `systemctl daemon-reload` after
creating/modifying your custom systemd files. You can see that the After directive is
combined from both files. Check it out by running `systemctl show vdsmd.service | grep
After`</div><div class=""><br
class=""></div><div class="">It makes sense to make
further changes to ensure that NFS stops last, but I haven't looked into that
yet.</div><div class="">:-)<br class=""><div
class="">
<div id="signature" class=""><br
class="">Cheers,<br class="">Gervais<br
class=""><br class=""><br
class=""></div>
</div>
<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite"
class=""><div class="">On Oct 3, 2016, at 7:22 AM, Gianluca
Cecchi <<a href="mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com"
class="">gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br
class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div
class=""><br
class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p dir="ltr"
class="">Il 28/Set/2016 21:09, "Gervais de Montbrun" <<a
href="mailto:gervais@demontbrun.com"
class="">gervais(a)demontbrun.com</a>&gt; ha scritto:<br
class="">
><br class="">
> Hi Gianluca,<br class="">
><br class="">
> Instead of editing the system's built in systemd configuration, you can do
the following...<br class="">
><br class="">
> Create a file called /etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service<br
class="">
><br class="">
>> # My custom ovirt-ha-broker.service config that ensures NFS
starts before ovirt-ha-broker.service<br class="">
>> # thanks Gervais for this tip! :-)<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> .include /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> [Unit]<br class="">
>> After=nfs-server.service<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> Then disable and enable ovirt-ha-broker.service (systemctl disable
ovirt-ha-broker.service ; systemctl enable ovirt-ha-broker.service) and you should see
that it is using your customized systemd unit definition. You can see that systemd is
using your file by running systemctl status ovirt-ha-broker.service. You'll see
something like "Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service;" in
the output.<br class="">
><br class="">
> Your file will survive updates and therefore always wait for nfs to start prior
to starting. You can do the same for your other customizations.<br
class="">
><br class="">
> Cheers,<br class="">
> Gervais<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
>> On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <<a
href="mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com"
class="">gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <<a
href="mailto:didi@redhat.com"
class="">didi(a)redhat.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br
class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi<br
class="">
>>> <<a href="mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com"
class="">gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br
class="">
>>> > Hello,<br class="">
>>> > how do the two modes apply in case of single host?<br
class="">
>>> > During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self
hosted engine and<br class="">
>>> > leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok,
what is the correct<br class="">
>>> > mode then to put host if I want finally to update it
too?<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before
upgrading them.<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other
hosts.<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs
to.<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> So you should do something like this:<br
class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> 1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down
the<br class="">
>>> engine and its vm)<br class="">
>>> 2. Shutdown all other VMs<br class="">
>>> 3. Shutdown engine vm from itself<br class="">
>>> At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But
it<br class="">
>>> might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but
perhaps<br class="">
>>> this might be required for vdsm. So:<br
class="">
>>> 4. Set local maintenance<br class="">
>>> 5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't
work, perhaps<br class="">
>>> better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously
happen<br class="">
>>> automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to
see<br class="">
>>> that it worked.<br class="">
>>> 6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.<br class="">
>>> 7. Start HA services<br class="">
>>> 8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and
global maint<br class="">
>>> are still set.<br class="">
>>> 9. Set maintenance to none<br class="">
>>> 10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will
decide<br class="">
>>> to start engine vm and should succeed.<br
class="">
>>> 11. Start all other VMs.<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> Didn't try this myself.<br class="">
>>><br class="">
>>> Best,<br class="">
>>> --<br class="">
>>> Didi<br class="">
>><br class="">
>><br class="">
>> Hello Didi,<br class="">
>> I would like to leverage the update I have to do on 2 small different lab
environments to crosscheck the steps suggested.<br class="">
>> They are both single host environments with self hosted engine.<br
class="">
>> One is 4.0.2 and the other is 4.0.3. Both on CentoS 7.2<br
class="">
>> I plan to migrate to the just released 4.0.4<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> One note: in both environments the storage is NFS and is provided by the
host itself, so a corner case (for all hosted_storage domain, main data domain and iso
storage domain).<br class="">
>> I customized the init scripts, basically for start phase of the server
and to keep in count of the NFS service, but probably something has to be done for stop
too?<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> 1) In /usr/lib/systemd/system/ovirt-ha-broker.service<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> added in section [Unit]<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> After=nfs-server.service<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> The file is overwritten at update so one has to keep in mind this<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> 2) also in vdsmd.service changed <br class="">
>> from:<br class="">
>> After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service
\<br class="">
>> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service
vdsm-network.service<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> to:<br class="">
>> After=multipathd.service libvirtd.service iscsid.service rpcbind.service
\<br class="">
>> supervdsmd.service sanlock.service
vdsm-network.service \<br class="">
>> nfs-server.service<br
class="">
>><br class="">
>> Do you think any order setup I have to put in place related to NFS
service and oVirt services stop?<br class="">
>><br class="">
>> _______________________________________________<br
class="">
>> Users mailing list<br class="">
>> <a href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
class="">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br class="">
>> <a href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
class="">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a...
class="">
><br class="">
></p><p dir="ltr" class="">Nice! I'm going to
try and see.<br class="">
Any particular dependency I should add for shutdown order due to the fact that my host is
also the NFS server providing data stores?<br class="">
Do I need to set up nfs stop only after a particular ovirt related service?<br
class="">
Thanks,<br class="">
Gianluca<br class="">
</p>
</div></blockquote></div><br
class=""></div></div>
</body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_47811EC6-85A4-4378-9247-A576777E881E--
12:15 a.m.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> how do the two modes apply in case of single host?
> During an upgrade phase, after having upgraded the self hosted engine and
> leaving global maintenance and having checked all is ok, what is the
correct
> mode then to put host if I want finally to update it too?
The docs say to put hosts to maintenance from the engine before upgrading
them.
This is (also) so that VMs on them are migrated away to other hosts.
With a single host, you have no other hosts to migrate VMs to.
So you should do something like this:
1. Set global maintenance (because you are going to take down the
engine and its vm)
2. Shutdown all other VMs
3. Shutdown engine vm from itself
At this point, you should be able to simply stop HA services. But it
might be cleaner to first set local maintenance. Not sure but perhaps
this might be required for vdsm. So:
4. Set local maintenance
5. Stop HA services. If setting local maintenance didn't work, perhaps
better stop also vdsm services. This stop should obviously happen
automatically by yum/rpm, but perhaps better do this manually to see
that it worked.
6. yum (or dnf) update stuff.
7. Start HA services
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
are still set.
9. Set maintenance to none
10. Check status again - I think that after some time HA will decide
to start engine vm and should succeed.
11. Start all other VMs.
Didn't try this myself.
Best,
--
Didi
I tested on one of the 2 environments.
It seems it worked.
But I update the kernel on host without restarting it. I would try that
with the other one.
Some notes:
8. Check status. I think you'll see that both local and global maint
are still set.
Actually even if I'm on global maintenance and then I set local
maintenance, it seems I "loose" the global maintenance state...
I see this output, without the line with Global Maintenance and exclamation
marks....:
[root@ractor ~]# hosted-engine --vm-status
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/lib/storage_backends.py:15:
DeprecationWarning: vdscli uses xmlrpc. since ovirt 3.6 xmlrpc is
deprecated, please use vdsm.jsonrpcvdscli
import vdsm.vdscli
--== Host 1 status ==--
Status up-to-date : False
Hostname : ractor.mydomain
Host ID : 1
Engine status : unknown stale-data
Score : 0
stopped : False
Local maintenance : True
crc32 : d616dde1
Host timestamp : 3304360
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp):
metadata_parse_version=1
metadata_feature_version=1
timestamp=3304360 (Mon Oct 3 22:27:07 2016)
host-id=1
score=0
maintenance=True
state=LocalMaintenance
stopped=False
[root@ractor ~]#
I'm able to exit maintenance, connect to engine and start the other VMs.
Now I have to try considering also the restart of the hypervisor host, due
to new kernel package install.
Gianluca
2972
days inactive
3002
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gervais de Montbrun -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Yedidyah Bar David