2:20 p.m.
Hi all
We're using RHEV 3.5.7 and have about 40 desktop VMs that are all clones
from a single original.
In the very beginning we used desktop pools but this was torn down when we
started getting "The trust relationship between this workstation and the
primary domain failed" error messages.
We use DHCP for all desktops however every VM is defined on the DHCP server
and unknown MACs are rejected.
I'd like to revisit desktop pools but I'd like to know if other are using
this and what their experiences have been.
Kind of thing I'd like to know is
- how is patching done
- what is the performance like
- what tuning if any is done on the desktops
- GPO vs LPO
Any comments?
Thanks
CC
2:57 p.m.
------=_Part_8264_999400629.1454158667138
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Colin,=20
I normally use desktop pools for virtual machines, which are the same, and =
single desktops for individual vms.=20
So mostly office vms are from a pool and admin vms aren't.=20
For patching you can either use some tools like Microsoft WSUS or for Linux=
vms Katello/Satellite/... or if you're using desktop pools it's also possi=
ble to patch the master image, create a new template with a new version and=
shut down all you vms. Afterwards they should boot with the new version if=
you did configure to always use the lastest version.=20
Performance of the virtual desktops depends on some things:=20
- protocol (Spice is really great in our tests) - also make sure you instal=
l all VirtIO drivers in your vms=20
- bandwith - this is no problem in the LAN, but for WAN setups this could b=
e an issue. Watching full HD videos in your vms can require 40mbit/s...=20
- thin clients - they need good graphics cards and at least 2gb ram and 2 c=
pu cores, better 4...=20
Most of my customers use GPOs for their virtual desktops, as it's easier to=
configure group policies then updating the master template too often...=20
I hope this helps...=20
Regards,=20
Ren=C3=A9=20
From: "Colin Coe" <colin.coe(a)gmail.com>=20
To: Users(a)ovirt.org=20
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 1:20:15 PM=20
Subject: [ovirt-users] VDI non-persistant desktops=20
Hi all=20
We're using RHEV 3.5.7 and have about 40 desktop VMs that are all clones fr=
om a single original.=20
In the very beginning we used desktop pools but this was torn down when we =
started getting "The trust relationship between this workstation and the pr=
imary domain failed" error messages.=20
We use DHCP for all desktops however every VM is defined on the DHCP server=
and unknown MACs are rejected.=20
I'd like to revisit desktop pools but I'd like to know if other are using t=
his and what their experiences have been.=20
Kind of thing I'd like to know is=20
- how is patching done=20
- what is the performance like=20
- what tuning if any is done on the desktops=20
- GPO vs LPO=20
Any comments?=20
Thanks=20
CC=20
_______________________________________________=20
Users mailing list=20
Users(a)ovirt.org=20
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users=20
------=_Part_8264_999400629.1454158667138
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><body><div style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
font-s=
ize: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hi
Colin,<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus=
=3D"1"></div><div>I normally use desktop pools for virtual
machines, which =
are the same, and single desktops for individual vms.<br data-mce-bogus=3D"=
1"></div><div>So mostly office vms are from a pool and admin vms
aren't.<br=
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div><br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>For pa=
tching you can either use some tools like Microsoft WSUS or for Linux vms K=
atello/Satellite/... or if you're using desktop pools it's also possible to=
patch the master image, create a new template with a new version and shut =
down all you vms. Afterwards they should boot with the new version if you d=
id configure to always use the lastest version.<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></d=
iv><div><br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>Performance of the virtual desk=
tops depends on some things:<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>- protocol =
(Spice is really great in our tests) - also make sure you install all VirtI=
O drivers in your vms<br data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>-
bandwith - this =
is no problem in the LAN, but for WAN setups this could be an issue. Watchi=
ng full HD videos in your vms can require 40mbit/s...<br data-mce-bogus=3D"=
1"></div><div>- thin clients - they need good graphics cards and at
least 2=
gb ram and 2 cpu cores, better 4...<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div><br =
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>Most of my customers use GPOs for
their vir=
tual desktops, as it's easier to configure group policies then updating the=
master template too often...<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div><br data-m=
ce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div>I hope this helps...<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></di=
v><div><br data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div><br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><=
div>Regards,<br>Ren=C3=A9<br
data-mce-bogus=3D"1"></div><div><br data-mce-b=
ogus=3D"1"></div><div><br></div><hr
id=3D"zwchr" data-marker=3D"__DIVIDER__=
"><div data-marker=3D"__HEADERS__"><b>From:
</b>"Colin Coe" <colin.coe@g=
mail.com><br><b>To: </b>Users(a)ovirt.org<br><b>Sent:
</b>Friday, January =
29, 2016 1:20:15 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>[ovirt-users] VDI non-persistant
des=
ktops<br></div><div><br></div><div
data-marker=3D"__QUOTED_TEXT__"><div dir=
=3D"ltr">Hi all<br><div>We're using RHEV 3.5.7 and have about
40 desktop VM=
s that are all clones from a single original.</div><br><div>In the very
beg=
inning we used desktop pools but this was torn down when we started getting=
"The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain fa=
iled" error messages.</div><br><div>We use DHCP for all desktops
however ev=
ery VM is defined on the DHCP server and unknown MACs are rejected.</div><b=
r><div>I'd like to revisit desktop pools but I'd like to know if other
are =
using this and what their experiences have been.</div><br><div>Kind of
thin=
g I'd like to know is</div><div>- how is patching
done</div><div>- what is =
the performance like</div><div>- what tuning if any is done on the desktops=
</div><div>- GPO vs LPO</div><br><div>Any
comments?</div><br><div>Thanks</d=
iv><div><br>CC</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Users mailing
list<b=
r>Users@ovirt.org<br>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br></div=
</div></body></html>
------=_Part_8264_999400629.1454158667138--
11:27 p.m.
--Apple-Mail=_73437F53-3FBB-442E-B07F-2187AEA14E11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Hi,
We've had the same experience as you with vm pools and have moved away from=
vm pools to non-pool vms and manual assignment for Windows vms. We have an=
open ticket with RH support for enabling stateful vm pool. This is the bug=
zilla entry if you=E2=80=99d like to add your interest for the stateful vm =
pools feature: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1234394 <https=
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1234394>
Regards,
Siggi
On 29 Jan 2016, at 13:20, Colin Coe <colin.coe(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
=20
Hi all
=20
We're using RHEV 3.5.7 and have about 40 desktop VMs that are all clones =
from
a single original.
=20
In the very beginning we used desktop pools but this was torn down when w=
e
started getting "The trust relationship between this workstation and the =
primary domain failed" error messages.
=20
We use DHCP for all desktops however every VM is defined on the DHCP serv=
er and
unknown MACs are rejected.
=20
I'd like to revisit desktop pools but I'd like to know if other are using=
this and what their experiences have been.
=20
Kind of thing I'd like to know is
- how is patching done
- what is the performance like
- what tuning if any is done on the desktops
- GPO vs LPO
=20
Any comments?
=20
Thanks
=20
CC
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_73437F53-3FBB-442E-B07F-2187AEA14E11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html charset=
=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word;
-webkit-nbsp-mode: sp=
ace; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=3D"">Hi,<div
class=3D"">=
<br class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">We've had
the same experience as you w=
ith vm pools and have moved away from vm pools to non-pool vms and manual a=
ssignment for Windows vms. We have an open ticket with RH support for enabl=
ing stateful vm pool. This is the bugzilla entry if you=E2=80=99d like to a=
dd your interest for the stateful vm pools feature: <a href=3D"https:/=
/bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1234394"
class=3D"">https://bugzilla=
redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1234394</a></div><div
class=3D""><br class=3D=
""></div><div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Regards,</div=
<div class=3D"">Siggi</div><div
class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div class=
=3D""><br class=3D""><div><blockquote
type=3D"cite" class=3D""><div class=
=3D"">On 29 Jan 2016, at 13:20, Colin Coe <<a
href=3D"mailto:colin.coe@gma=
il.com" class=3D"">colin.coe(a)gmail.com</a>&gt;
wrote:</div><br class=3D"App=
le-interchange-newline"><div class=3D""><div
dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"">Hi all<=
div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"">We're using RHEV 3.5.7 =
and have about 40 desktop VMs that are all clones from a single original.</=
div><div class=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"">In the very beginn=
ing we used desktop pools but this was torn down when we started getting "T=
he trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain faile=
d" error messages.</div><div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div><div class=3D"=
">We use DHCP for all desktops however every VM is defined on the DHCP serv=
er and unknown MACs are rejected.</div><div class=3D""><br
class=3D""></div=
<div class=3D"">I'd like to revisit desktop pools
but I'd like to know if =
other are using this and what their experiences have
been.</div><div class=
=3D""><br class=3D""></div><div
class=3D"">Kind of thing I'd like to know is=
</div><div class=3D"">- how is patching done</div><div
class=3D"">- what is=
the performance like</div><div class=3D"">- what tuning if any is
done on =
the desktops</div><div class=3D"">- GPO vs LPO</div><div
class=3D""><br cla=
ss=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Any
comments?</div><div class=3D""><br class=
=3D""></div><div class=3D"">Thanks</div><div
class=3D""><br class=3D"">CC</d=
iv></div>
_______________________________________________<br class=3D"">Users
mailing=
list<br class=3D""><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
class=3D"">Users@ovi=
rt.org</a><br
class=3D"">http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br c=
lass=3D""></div></blockquote></div><br
class=3D""></div></body>=
</html>
--Apple-Mail=_73437F53-3FBB-442E-B07F-2187AEA14E11--
2:57 a.m.
Hi and thanks for the reply.
Not really what we're after. We want the stateless VMs but we want to be
able to work on the template (patch, install addtional software, etc) and
have those changes flow through to the existing VMs based on these
templates. In addition, when the VMs are refreshed based on the updated
template, we need the MAC addresses to persist (as we define all our leases
in DHCP).
Thanks
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Sigbjorn Lie <sigbjorn(a)nixtra.com> wrote:
Hi,
We've had the same experience as you with vm pools and have moved away
from vm pools to non-pool vms and manual assignment for Windows vms. We
have an open ticket with RH support for enabling stateful vm pool. This is
the bugzilla entry if you’d like to add your interest for the stateful vm
pools feature: https://bugzillaredhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234394
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234394>
Regards,
Siggi
On 29 Jan 2016, at 13:20, Colin Coe <colin.coe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all
We're using RHEV 3.5.7 and have about 40 desktop VMs that are all clones
from a single original.
In the very beginning we used desktop pools but this was torn down when we
started getting "The trust relationship between this workstation and the
primary domain failed" error messages.
We use DHCP for all desktops however every VM is defined on the DHCP
server and unknown MACs are rejected.
I'd like to revisit desktop pools but I'd like to know if other are using
this and what their experiences have been.
Kind of thing I'd like to know is
- how is patching done
- what is the performance like
- what tuning if any is done on the desktops
- GPO vs LPO
Any comments?
Thanks
CC
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3007
days inactive
3010
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Colin Coe -
René Koch -
Sigbjorn Lie