On 11/30/2011 02:03 AM, David Jorm wrote: >>> 3. these tars have basically been tested. >> Not sure what the definition of 'tested' is, probably worth expanding >> it >> a bit. >> Y. > I would think just smoke tested. > > David I would like to believe the code should pass smoke tests at all times. When it doesn't, it's a regression we should strive to fix asap. Y.