oVirt 3.1 targeted release platform
Dave Allan
dallan at redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 01:27:13 UTC 2012
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:29:41PM -0400, Perry Myers wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 03:41 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:14:15PM -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> From a users perspective, it would be best for it to work on both 16 &
> >> 17 for a period of time.
> >
> > I believe that this makes "it" a "them" - at lease for vdsm this would
> > require two rpms built and QAed. I hope we can avoid that, and release
> > only one stack, preferably over f17.
>
> What if we got virt-preview updated again so that it contained the right
> packages so that the same version of vdsm would work on both:
>
> * f16 + virt_preview
> * f17
>
> Then we can have oVirt Node built based on f16 + virt_preview for now,
> and eventually move to pure f17.
>
> Dave/Cole, is updating virt-preview something you guys can help with?
Sure, virt-preview is sorely due for an update, and this is good
motivation to do it.
Dave
> Perry
>
> > Note that even though vdsm's HEAD requires stuff that is out of f16,
> > the vdsm team could produce stable vdsm builds for whatever platform
> > that we choose.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Arch mailing list
> > Arch at ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
More information about the Arch
mailing list