the new oVirt website: live preview!

Daniel Veillard veillard at redhat.com
Thu Sep 20 14:06:59 UTC 2012


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:57:07PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09/20/2012 02:27 PM, Garrett LeSage wrote:
> >On 09/20/2012 08:17 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >>   The top page and the Download page don't even tell what licence
> >>is applicable, IMHO that crucial information should be presented to
> >>the user between the time it hits the home page and the time he's told
> >>how to install it on Fedora 17.
> >
> >That's a great point.
> >
> >Is it enough to mention "ASL2.0" in the footer and link to a licensing
> >page, like the current oVirt.org website does? Or should we say more?
> 
> IMHO, the license matters at earliest when you're downloading (so
> not on the front page), and probably only when you're making changes
> (the "Developer" or "Contributor" pages). The important thing is to

  I think you're optimistic there. Lot of people won't download stuff
if they can't tell the Licence upfront, not just me :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel at veillard.com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/



More information about the Arch mailing list