the new oVirt website: live preview!
Daniel Veillard
veillard at redhat.com
Thu Sep 20 14:06:59 UTC 2012
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:57:07PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/20/2012 02:27 PM, Garrett LeSage wrote:
> >On 09/20/2012 08:17 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >> The top page and the Download page don't even tell what licence
> >>is applicable, IMHO that crucial information should be presented to
> >>the user between the time it hits the home page and the time he's told
> >>how to install it on Fedora 17.
> >
> >That's a great point.
> >
> >Is it enough to mention "ASL2.0" in the footer and link to a licensing
> >page, like the current oVirt.org website does? Or should we say more?
>
> IMHO, the license matters at earliest when you're downloading (so
> not on the front page), and probably only when you're making changes
> (the "Developer" or "Contributor" pages). The important thing is to
I think you're optimistic there. Lot of people won't download stuff
if they can't tell the Licence upfront, not just me :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel at veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
More information about the Arch
mailing list