RE: package signing
Doron Fediuck
dfediuck at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 16:01:43 UTC 2012
+1 for the need.
I think we should give md5 or similar hashes, and let distro's do the signing.
Sent from my Android phone. Please ignore typos.
-----Original Message-----
From: David =?UTF-8?Q?Ja=C5=A1a?= [djasa at redhat.com]
Received: Thursday, 26 Jan 2012, 15:33
To: board at ovirt.org
Subject: package signing
Hi,
at least nightly fedora repo is not signed (i didn't look at the other
ones but I suspect that all other repos are also unsigned). We should
establish package signing infrastructure and we should also publish
signing key fingerprint on SSL/TLS-secured page to prevent any MITM
attack aimed on ovirt repo users.
David
--
David Jaša, RHCE
SPICE QE based in Brno
GPG Key: 22C33E24
Fingerprint: 513A 060B D1B4 2A72 7F0D 0278 B125 CD00 22C3 3E24
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board at ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/board
Sent from my Android phone. Please ignore typos.
More information about the Board
mailing list