non-coding sub-projects

Karsten 'quaid' Wade kwade at redhat.com
Mon Jul 9 22:54:02 UTC 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Infrastructure team began discussing seeking formal recognition as
a sub-project of oVirt.

However, the current methodology is clearly focused on code:

http://www.ovirt.org/governance/adding-a-subproject/

As such, I'm not even sure we know exactly what the Infra team is
asking for! At a minimum, I think the goal is to:

* Get 3+ maintainers in the project, then
* Get recognition as a formal project, and
* Maintainers join the Board to proactively drive infrastructure for
the entire project.

What think you all?

- - Karsten
- -- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v.  gpg: AD0E0C41

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFP+2EK2ZIOBq0ODEERApEAAKCaLNWnwluKuLZ9YfqLx23Bo03+5ACeIKay
7uAqsUbsQg4xvL/Kji1bNb0=
=082m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Board mailing list