[ovirt-devel] Code owners configuration for GitHub projects
Barak Korren
bkorren at redhat.com
Mon Nov 6 08:37:35 UTC 2017
On 8 September 2017 at 15:36, Martin Sivak <msivak at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Is actually prefer if there was a way to keep this out of the code, or if
>>> they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own.
>>
>> It is the same format.
>
> Ah, it is the same format some kubernetes projects use (like
> https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/CODEOWNERS). The
> main repo uses their own OWNERS which is slightly different.
>
> Martin
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Not sure what are they using to identify people, are these GitHub usernames?
>>> This feels a bit like lock-in.
>>
>> @usernames or emails
>>
>>> It might be better to enforce using email addresse in the file.
>>
>> Should work according to the article.
>>
>>> Is actually prefer if there was a way to keep this out of the code, or if
>>> they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own.
>>
>> It is the same format.
>>
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> בתאריך 8 בספט׳ 2017 14:18, "Martin Sivak" <msivak at redhat.com> כתב:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently noticed GitHub enabled a feature that allows specifying
>>> code owners for different pieces of code:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/blog/2392-introducing-code-owners
>>>
>>> It should supposedly automatically
>>>
>>> add the proper reviewers to patches.
>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure what are they using to identify people, are these GitHub usernames?
>>> This feels a bit like lock-in.
>>>
>>> It might be better to enforce using email addresse in the file.
>>>
>>> Is actually prefer if there was a way to keep this out of the code, or if
>>> they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own.
>>>
>>>
>>> We have similar feature enabled in Gerrit and it might make sense for
>>> our GitHub specific projects to do the same.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, why not. Its been very useful in Gerrit.
>>>
>>> (It might even make sense
>>> to follow the same format in Gerrit)
>>>
>>>
>>> If soneone would contribute a parser to the GitHub format (which is to say,
>>> something that would scan a commit and yield a list of addresses). We could
>>> make it work with a hook or a Jenkins job.
Not to revive this old thread too much, but here is a Jira ticker
tracking further work on this issue:
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1739
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
More information about the Devel
mailing list