[ovirt-devel] dynamic ownership changes
Raz Tamir
ratamir at redhat.com
Wed Apr 11 13:38:07 UTC 2018
+Elad
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:31 PM Eyal Edri <eedri at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please make sure to run as much OST suites on this patch as possible
>>> before merging ( using 'ci please build' )
>>>
>>
>> But note that OST is not a way to verify the patch.
>>
>> Such changes require testing with all storage types we support.
>>
>> Nir
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Martin Polednik <mpolednik at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a patch[0] that is finally able to activate libvirt's
>>>> dynamic_ownership for VDSM while not negatively affecting
>>>> functionality of our storage code.
>>>>
>>>> That of course comes with quite a bit of code removal, mostly in the
>>>> area of host devices, hwrng and anything that touches devices; bunch
>>>> of test changes and one XML generation caveat (storage is handled by
>>>> VDSM, therefore disk relabelling needs to be disabled on the VDSM
>>>> level).
>>>>
>>>> Because of the scope of the patch, I welcome storage/virt/network
>>>> people to review the code and consider the implication this change has
>>>> on current/future features.
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/89830/
>>>>
>>>
> In particular: dynamic_ownership was set to 0 prehistorically (as part of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554961 ) because libvirt,
> running as root, was not able to play properly with root-squash nfs mounts.
>
> Have you attempted this use case?
>
> I join to Nir's request to run this with storage QE.
>
--
Raz Tamir
Manager, RHV QE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180411/00e415a3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Devel
mailing list