[Engine-devel] Change in default ports: 6090 and 6091
Itamar Heim
iheim at redhat.com
Sun Aug 26 07:36:26 UTC 2012
On 08/24/2012 03:45 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 01:42 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 08/24/2012 02:27 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Some time ago I requested feedback about a change in the port numbers
>>> used by the engine, the details are in this thread:
>>>
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/engine-devel/2012-July/002089.html
>>>
>>> I didn't receive bad feedback, neither in the thread or in the proposed
>>> change in gerrit:
>>>
>>> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/6348
>>>
>>> I tested it as much as I can, so I think it is ready for merge. Unless
>>> someone has an strong reason to not do this change I will merge it on
>>> Monday 27 afternoon.
>>>
>>> Remember that with this change the default ports used by the engine will
>>> be 6090 for HTTP and 6091 for HTTPS. This will affect RPM installations
>>
>> danken - what is the range of spice ports used by vdsm (iirc they start
>> with 5900) and what are the secure ports?
>> juan - maybe something that close to spice/vnc ports to avoid collission
>> on an all-in-one.
>
> Yes, it is be good idea to stay away from those spice and VNC port
> ranges. What about 8700 and 8701? They are also available according to
> /etc/services and IANA [1].
sounds good to me.
>
>>> and also development environments, so next time you do "mvn -Psetup"
>>> your local installation of the application server will start using port
>>> 6090 instead of 8080.
>>>
>>> Also take into account that if you are using Apache as a proxy it will
>>> continue using ports 80 and 443 by default, no change there.
>>>
>>> If you have objections please let me know.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Juan Hernández
>
> [1]
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xml
>
>
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list