[Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID

[Itamar Heim]

On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
> Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it
> explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
>
> If someone feels strongly against, please reply.

I still like 'label' better.
it doesn't have the context of a unique id, and is much more correct to 
what this is - allows the user to label a command (or a set of commands).
but also doesn't imply it's unique in any way (i.e., it's like a "tag", 
just a better, non overloaded term for it).

>
> Ori
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Pasternak"<mpastern at redhat.com>
> To: "Moti Asayag"<masayag at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ori Liel"<oliel at redhat.com>, engine-devel at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID
>
> On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote:
>>>> No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is blocking me.
>>>>
>>>> Names that were suggested so far:
>>>>
>>>> * flow-id
>
> +1
>