[Engine-devel] RFC: Writeup on VDSM-libstoragemgmt integration

Deepak C Shetty deepakcs at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed May 30 09:38:46 UTC 2012


Hello All,

     I have a draft write-up on the VDSM-libstoragemgmt integration.
I wanted to run this thru' the mailing list(s) to help tune and 
crystallize it, before putting it on the ovirt wiki.
I have run this once thru Ayal and Tony, so have some of their comments 
incorporated.

I still have few doubts/questions, which I have posted below with lines 
ending with '?'

Comments / Suggestions are welcome & appreciated.

thanx,
deepak

[Ccing engine-devel and libstoragemgmt lists as this stuff is relevant 
to them too]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1) Background:

VDSM provides high level API for node virtualization management. It acts 
in response to the requests sent by oVirt Engine, which uses VDSM to do 
all node virtualization related tasks, including but not limited to 
storage management.

libstoragemgmt aims to provide vendor agnostic API for managing external 
storage array. It should help system administrators utilizing open 
source solutions have a way to programmatically manage their storage 
hardware in a vendor neutral way. It also aims to facilitate management 
automation, ease of use and take advantage of storage vendor supported 
features which improve storage performance and space utilization.

Home Page: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libstoragemgmt/

libstoragemgmt (LSM) today supports C and python plugins for talking to 
external storage array using SMI-S as well as native interfaces (eg: 
netapp plugin )
Plan is to grow the SMI-S interface as needed over time and add more 
vendor specific plugins for exploiting features not possible via SMI-S 
or have better alternatives than using SMI-S.
For eg: Many of the copy offload features require to use vendor specific 
commands, which justifies the need for a vendor specific plugin.


2) Goals:

     2a) Ability to plugin external storage array into oVirt/VDSM 
virtualization stack, in a vendor neutral way.

     2b) Ability to list features/capabilities and other statistical 
info of the array

     2c) Ability to utilize the storage array offload capabilities from 
oVirt/VDSM.


3) Details:

LSM will sit as a new repository engine in VDSM.
VDSM Repository Engine WIP @ http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,192

Current plan is to have LSM co-exist with VDSM on the virtualization nodes.

*Note : 'storage' used below is generic. It can be a file/nfs-export for 
NAS targets and LUN/logical-drive for SAN targets.

VDSM can use LSM and do the following...
     - Provision storage
     - Consume storage

3.1) Provisioning Storage using LSM

Typically this will be done by a Storage administrator.

oVirt/VDSM should provide storage admin the
     - ability to list the different storage arrays along with their 
types (NAS/SAN), capabilities, free/used space.
     - ability to provision storage using any of the array capabilities 
(eg: thin provisioned lun or new NFS export )
     - ability to manage the provisioned storage (eg: resize/delete storage)

Once the storage is provisioned by the storage admin, VDSM will have to 
refresh the host(s) for them to be able to see the newly provisioned 
storage.

3.1.1) Potential flows:

Mgmt -> vdsm -> lsm: create LUN + LUN Mapping / Zoning / whatever is 
needed to make LUN available to list of hosts passed by mgmt
Mgmt -> vdsm: getDeviceList (refreshes host and gets list of devices)
  Repeat above for all relevant hosts (depending on list passed earlier, 
mostly relevant when extending an existing VG)
Mgmt -> use LUN in normal flows.


3.1.2) How oVirt Engine will know which LSM to use ?

Normally the way this works today is that user can choose the host to 
use (default today is SPM), however there are a few flows where mgmt 
will know which host to use:
1. extend storage domain (add LUN to existing VG) - Use SPM and make 
sure *all* hosts that need access to this SD can see the new LUN
2. attach new LUN to a VM which is pinned to a specific host - use this host
3. attach new LUN to a VM which is not pinned - use a host from the 
cluster the VM belongs to and make sure all nodes in cluster can see the 
new LUN

Flows for which there is no clear candidate (Maybe we can use the SPM 
host itself which is the default ?)
1. create a new disk without attaching it to any VM
2. create a LUN for a new storage domain


3.2) Consuming storage using LSM

Typically this will be done by a virtualization administrator

oVirt/VDSM should allow virtualization admin to
     - Create a new storage domain using the storage on the array.
     - Be able to specify whether VDSM should use the storage offload 
capability (default) or override it to use its own internal logic.

4) VDSM potential changes:

4.1) How to represent a VM disk, 1 LUN = 1 VMdisk or 1 LV = 1 VMdisk ? 
which bring another question...1 array == 1 storage domain OR 1 
LUN/nfs-export on the array == 1 storage domain ?

Pros & Cons of each...

1 array == 1 storage domain
     - Each new vmdisk (aka volume) will be a new lun/file on the array.
     - Easier to exploit offload capabilities, as they are available at 
the LUN/File granularity
     - Will there be any issues where there will be too many LUNs/Files 
... any maxluns limit on linux hosts that we might hit ?
         -- VDSM has been tested with 1K LUNs and it worked fine - ayal
     - Storage array limitations on the number of LUNs can be a downside 
here.
     - Would it be ok to share the array for hosting another storage 
domain if need be ?
         -- Provided the existing domain is not utilising all of the 
free space
         -- We can create new LUNs and hand it over to anyone needed ?
     -- Changes needed in VDSM to work with raw LUNs, today it only has 
support for consuming LUNs via VG/LV.

1 LUN/nfs-export on the array == 1 storage domain
     - How to represent a new vmdisk (aka vdsm volume) if its a LUN 
provisioned using SAN target ?
         -- Will it be VG/LV as is done today for block domains ?
         -- If yes, then it will be difficult to exploit offload 
capabilities, as they are at LUN level, not at LV level.
     - Each new vmdisk will be a new file on the nfs-export, assuming 
offload capability is available at the file level, so this should work 
for NAS targets ?
     - Can use the storage array for hosting multiple storage domains.
         -- Provision one more LUN and use it for another storage domain 
if need be.
     - VDSM already supports this today, as part of block storage 
domains for LUNs case.

Note that we will allow user to do either one of the two options above, 
depending on need.

4.2) Storage domain metadata will also include the features/capabilities 
of the storage array as reported by LSM.
         - Capabilities (taken via LSM) will be stored in the domain 
metadata during storage domain create flow.
         - Need changes in oVirt engine as well ( see 'oVirt Engine 
potential changes' section below )

4.3) VDSM to poll LSM for array capabilities on a regular basis ?
Per ayal:
     - If we have a 'storage array' entity in oVirt Engine (see 'oVirt 
Engine potential changes' section below ) then we can have a 'refresh 
capabilities' button/verb.
     - We can periodically query the storage array.
     - Query LSM before running operations (sounds redundant to me, but 
if it's cheap enough it could be simplest).

     Probably need a combination of 1+2 (query at very low frequency - 
1/hour or 1/day + refresh button)


5) oVirt Engine potential changes - as described by ayal :

     - We will either need a new 'storage array' entity in engine to 
keep credentials, or, in case of storage array as storage domain, just 
keep this info as part of the domain at engine level.
     - Have a 'storage array' entity in oVirt Engine to support  
'refresh capabilities' as a button/verb.
     - When user during storage provisioning, selects a LUN exported 
from a storage array (via LSM), the oVirt Engine would know from then 
onwards that this LUN is being served via LSM.
       It would then  be able to query the  capabilities of the LUN and 
show it to the virt admin during storage consumption flow.

6) Potential flows:
     - Create snapshot flow
         -- VDSM will check the snapshot offload capability in the 
domain metadata
         -- If available, and override is not configured, it will use 
LSM to offload LUN/File snapshot
         -- If override is configured or capability is not available, it 
will use its internal logic to create
            snapshot (qcow2).

     - Copy/Clone vmdisk flow
         -- VDSM will check the copy offload capability in the domain 
metadata
         -- If available, and override is not configured, it will use 
LSM to offload LUN/File copy
         -- If override is configured or capability is not available, it 
will use its internal logic to create
            snapshot (eg: dd cmd in case of LUN).

7) LSM potential changes:

     - list features/capabilities of the array. Eg: copy offload, thin 
prov. etc.
     - list containers (aka pools) (present in LSM today)
     - Ability to list different types of arrays being managed, their 
capabilities and used/free space
     - Ability to create/list/delete/resize volumes ( LUN or exports, 
available in LSM as of today)
     - Get monitoring info with object (LUN/snapshot/volume) as optional 
parameter for specific info. eg: container/pool free/used space, raid 
type etc.

Need to make sure above info is listed in a coherent way across arrays 
(number of LUNs, raid type used? free/total per container/pool, per 
LUN?. Also need I/O statistics wherever possible.





More information about the Engine-devel mailing list