[Engine-devel] Managing permissions on network
Moti Asayag
masayag at redhat.com
Tue Nov 13 13:17:18 UTC 2012
On 11/13/2012 12:45 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
> On 13/11/12 10:57, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 02:56 PM, Livnat Peer wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> This is a proposal for handling network permissions in oVirt.
>>>
>>> In this proposal we took the more permissive approach as we find it
>>> simple and a good starting point, we also think a more restrict approach
>>> makes the configuration of a network cumbersome for ovirt administrators.
>>>
>>> Inputs are welcomed as always...
>>>
>>> Here is an overview of the approach, for more detailed description
>>> please read the wiki page:
>>> http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/NetworkPermissions
>>>
>>
>>
>>> High Level Feature Description
>>> Admin
>>>
>>> For creating a network in a DC you need to be SuperUser or
>>> DataCenterAdmin or NetworkAdmin on the DC.
>>
>> since there are multiple permissions among the differnet roles, maybe
>> worth specifying the actual permissions (actiongroups), rather than just
>> the roles?
>>
>
> you can find this info in the wiki page itself,this is only high level
> summary.
>
>>> After creating the network you can manipulate the network if you
>>> are a DataCenterAdmin or NetworkAdmin on the relevant network (or the
>>> whole DC).
>>> For attaching the network to cluster user needs to be NetworkAdmin
>>> on the network (no requirement to have permission on the cluster)
>>> ClusterAdmin cannot attach/detach a network from the cluster, the
>>> motivation for this is that as long as the network is not attached to
>>> the cluster it is not part of the cluster resources thus can not be
>>> managed by the cluster administrator.
>>
>> I'm not sure above two lines are intuitive to manage (a network admin
>> can manipulate a cluster, but the cluster admin can't change networks in
>> the cluster? this means you must give network permissions, at DC level,
>> so you can't limit an admin to network attach/detach to a specific cluster.
>>
>
> That is true but looking on the alternative I think it make sense.
> The alternative is to require two permissions for attaching a network to
> a cluster one is networkAdmin (for editing network properties) on a
> network and the other is networkAttach (a separate Role?) on a cluster
> or the DC (if you want the user to be able to add the network for all
> the clusters in the DC).
> While I think the common use case is that a network administrator will
> be able to attach the network to all the clusters I find the above
> cumbersome and rather stick to the approach that you need only a single
> permission and you can't limit the network manager to specific cluster.
>
> I think that if a requirement for limiting the network to specific
> clusters comes from our users only then we should make the model more
> strict and require two permissions.
>
>
>>> The ClusterAdmin can change a network from required to
>>> non-required for controlling the impact of the network within the
>>> cluster.
>>> For setting or manipulating a network on the host you need to be
>>> host administrator on the host and you don't need to be network
>>> administrator.
>>>
>>> User
>>>
>>> For attaching a network to a Vnic in the VM you need to have the
>>> role of VmNetworkUser on the network and VmAdmin on the VM.
>>
>> again, roles are just default roles, please specify the actual
>> permission (actiongroup)
>
> take a look in the wiki for exact details (which role is composed out of
> which action groups)
>>
>>> In user portal - the list of shown network for a user will include
>>> only the list of networks the user is allowed to attach to its vnics
>>> (instead of all cluster's networks).
>>
>> or attached to user VMs.
>> and need to handle case of network attached to template but user has no
>> permission to that network?
>>
>
> Interesting point, I think that if a user has permission to create a VM
> from a specific template we should give him permission to use the
> template networks on this VM implicitly upon the VM creation.
>
> I noticed the wiki page is missing which permission should be given to
> users on which networks/VMs during upgrade - Moti?
>
Added:
* '''VmNetworkUser''' role will be given to the user on each network
attached to the VM/Template.
* '''AdvancedVmNetworkUser''' role will be given to the user on each
network attached to the VM with port-mirroring enabled.
>
>> <snip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Engine-devel mailing list
> Engine-devel at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>
More information about the Engine-devel
mailing list