[Engine-devel] [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27

[Sandro Bonazzola]

Il 29/11/2013 13:13, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>> Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
>>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola  wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Meeting summary
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>> * Agenda and roll Call  (doron, 15:02:42)
>>>>>   * 3.3 update releases  (doron, 15:04:23)
>>>>>   * 3.4 planning  (doron, 15:04:24)
>>>>>   * conferences and workshops  (doron, 15:04:26)
>>>>>   * infra update  (doron, 15:04:27)
>>>>>   * other topics  (doron, 15:04:29)
>>>>>   * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~
>>>>>     (danken, 15:12:58)
>>>>>   * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794   (mburns, 15:15:04)
>>>>>   * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/   (mburns,
>>>>>     15:15:48)
>>>>>   * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release
>>>>>     project  (doron, 15:18:17)
>>>>
>>>> ovirt-release-9 released yesterday
>>>
>>> BTW: I see that this package contains
>>> /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo
>>> (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so)
>>> By default all lines are disabled in it.
>>> When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or
>>> only under developers/maintainers indications?
>>
>> I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable shouldn't need it.
>> However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not needed if you run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as
>> hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer.
> 
> Vdsm is not in
> http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-20/x86_64/
> 
> virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should
> be dropped from ovirt-release.
> 
> It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of
> libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a
> fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from
> virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us.
> 
> Dan.
> 

So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release?
What about nightly? Will it be needed there?

-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com