[Engine-devel] [Users] oVirt Weekly Meeting Minutes -- 2013-11-27

[Dan Kenigsberg]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:18:53PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il 29/11/2013 13:13, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> >> Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Meeting summary
> >>>>> ---------------
> >>>>> * Agenda and roll Call  (doron, 15:02:42)
> >>>>>   * 3.3 update releases  (doron, 15:04:23)
> >>>>>   * 3.4 planning  (doron, 15:04:24)
> >>>>>   * conferences and workshops  (doron, 15:04:26)
> >>>>>   * infra update  (doron, 15:04:27)
> >>>>>   * other topics  (doron, 15:04:29)
> >>>>>   * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~
> >>>>>     (danken, 15:12:58)
> >>>>>   * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794   (mburns, 15:15:04)
> >>>>>   * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/   (mburns,
> >>>>>     15:15:48)
> >>>>>   * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release
> >>>>>     project  (doron, 15:18:17)
> >>>>
> >>>> ovirt-release-9 released yesterday
> >>>
> >>> BTW: I see that this package contains
> >>> /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo
> >>> (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so)
> >>> By default all lines are disabled in it.
> >>> When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or
> >>> only under developers/maintainers indications?
> >>
> >> I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable shouldn't need it.
> >> However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not needed if you run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as
> >> hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer.
> > 
> > Vdsm is not in
> > http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-20/x86_64/
> > 
> > virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should
> > be dropped from ovirt-release.
> > 
> > It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of
> > libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a
> > fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from
> > virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us.
> > 
> > Dan.
> > 
> 
> So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release?
> What about nightly? Will it be needed there?

Should be removed from both, since it is currently unused. We could
reintroduce it if the need arises.