Puppet proposal

[Eyal Edri]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade at redhat.com>
> To: infra at ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:24:09 PM
> Subject: Re: Puppet proposal
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 08/14/2012 03:25 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > 
> > i have a deamon i've written already - attached.
> 
> Do we have a git repo for the Infra team yet? I know we could have
> Puppet manifests in its own repo, but we have other version control
> needs. Maybe one repo?

i recommend one repo for puppet classes. ('puppet')
we can publish it to community also, so people can contribute puppet classes we well.

i still think we need a separate 'jenkins' repo for all jenkins code, for personal exp using complex jenkins code in jobs.

but i won't object to have a single repo for starts with subdirectories (/jenkins /puppet /foreman) 

E.
> 
> - - Karsten
> - --
> Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'  gpg: AD0E0C41
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iD8DBQFQKl+J2ZIOBq0ODEERArmdAKCH4ro2WnKzyFu+TX6g8zlIdn5xWQCgxfVF
> 5KbY33AL3uVuGOJqQLlUdSc=
> =2cy5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>