Fwd: Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval

Karsten 'quaid' Wade kwade at redhat.com
Mon Nov 26 15:56:00 UTC 2012


On 11/26/2012 07:51 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Doron,
> 
> On 11/26/2012 04:41 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
>> I've been getting this too much lately...
>>
>> Currently I'm having a discussion with ~9 people.
>> Is this reason really needed?
>> If so, can we increase the # to something reasonable? Let's say 20?
> 
> May I ask, is everyone in the discussion registered for the list? If so,
> perhaps you can avoid including them all in the "To:" or "CC:" lines?
> 
> 20 people CCed is a lot for a mailing list. 10 sounds much more
> reasonable to me.
> 
> We can also change the mailing list rules to remove members of the list
> from the CC list of emails you get - this should ensure that only people
> who are not subscribed to the list stay CCed.

Ooh, I didn't know Mailman would do that, that's a great idea. (I always
like to remove all the extra recipients, but sometimes you don't know
who is on the list or not.)

What setting is that?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'  gpg: AD0E0C41

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20121126/107b1f7e/attachment.sig>


More information about the Infra mailing list