Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval

[Doron Fediuck]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade at redhat.com>
> To: infra at ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:56:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Your message to Arch awaits moderator approval
> 
> On 11/26/2012 07:51 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Hi Doron,
> > 
> > On 11/26/2012 04:41 PM, Doron Fediuck wrote:
> >> I've been getting this too much lately...
> >>
> >> Currently I'm having a discussion with ~9 people.
> >> Is this reason really needed?
> >> If so, can we increase the # to something reasonable? Let's say
> >> 20?
> > 
> > May I ask, is everyone in the discussion registered for the list?
> > If so,
> > perhaps you can avoid including them all in the "To:" or "CC:"
> > lines?
> > 
> > 20 people CCed is a lot for a mailing list. 10 sounds much more
> > reasonable to me.
> > 
> > We can also change the mailing list rules to remove members of the
> > list
> > from the CC list of emails you get - this should ensure that only
> > people
> > who are not subscribed to the list stay CCed.
> 

Dave, that's a good question, which I thought of before writing my initial mail.
The simple answer is: "I don't know for sure". Actually is there a way for me to list
the members of a specific list? 
I know there are many users in subscribed to relevant lists (for vdsm, infra, etc), but
removing one or more from a thread can actually become an insult. So as a habit I really 
prefer to avoid it.

I really hope that 10 recipients along with mailman removing redundancy
will do the trick. 

> Ooh, I didn't know Mailman would do that, that's a great idea. (I
> always
> like to remove all the extra recipients, but sometimes you don't know
> who is on the list or not.)
> 

+20

> What setting is that?
> 
> - Karsten
> --
> Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Analyst - Community Growth
> http://TheOpenSourceWay.org  .^\  http://community.redhat.com
> @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC)  \v'  gpg: AD0E0C41
> 
>