Minutes :: Infra weekly sync :: 20121126

[Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> >>>i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which
> >>>repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize
> >>>for me name of repos and maintainers for each.
> >We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think?
> >
> >At the least, I think we need:
> >
> >web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks

I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web.

> >For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git
> >before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe
> >we need a source control for that anyway?

I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need
those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files
in our scripts repo or something.

> >infra_scripts: (all of Infra team)

How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more
consistent with other repositories that also use a dash.

> are these the final names?

Almost ;)