Minutes :: Infra weekly sync :: 20121126

[Itamar Heim]

On 11/27/2012 07:29 PM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:11:19PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/27/2012 03:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>>>>> i tried to follow the thread, but could discern the summary of which
>>>>> repos you want (separate for foreman/puppet, etc.). please summarize
>>>>> for me name of repos and maintainers for each.
>>> We need to do that, but haven't figured it out all the way, I think?
>>>
>>> At the least, I think we need:
>>>
>>> web :: (all of Infra team) + dneary, garrett, jbrooks
>
> I'm more in favor of website, but can be fine with web.

i suggest prefixing all with infra to not confuse with ovirt web.
so infra-web, etc.

>
>>> For Foreman/Puppet, I'm not sure yet. What I would have put in git
>>> before (scripts, etc.) will be RPMs for Puppet to consume. But maybe
>>> we need a source control for that anyway?
>
> I'd prefer puppet here, but try to keep RPMs out of it. When we need
> those I'd rather make a real yum repository. Maybe keep the spec files
> in our scripts repo or something.
>
>>> infra_scripts: (all of Infra team)
>
> How about infra-scripts? Again, minor bike shedding but I feel it's more
> consistent with other repositories that also use a dash.
>
>> are these the final names?
>
> Almost ;)
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>