Hosting offer from Alter Way
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
ewoud+ovirt at kohlvanwijngaarden.nl
Wed Oct 3 15:55:56 UTC 2012
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:24:27PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Alter Way (oVirt user and community member, French company) have
> generously offered to host some of our services as part of their
> efforts to support the project.
>
> To give some background: The company is preparing a cloud offering
> based on oVirt nightlies running on Fedora. They are a hosting
> company (among other things) based in Paris, France.
>
> We talked to them about our needs for Jenkins, and after getting
> reassurance on the bandwidth requirements for the Jenkins server,
> they have ade the following offer:
>
> Alter Way will provide:
> - For Jenkins, 2 Bi Quad servers (with Jenkins running on bare
> metal) with 8 or 16 GB of RAM each and 2 fast 146 GB disks each,
> with RAID 10 for the 4 disks
> - For other services (Gerrit, Mailman, wiki, git): 1 or 2 VMs
> hosted on oVirt
>
> In return, they would like:
> - Recognition of the hosting in the page footer of the hosted services
> - Recognition as a project sponsor on the project sponsors and
> supporters page
> - The also offer to have their cloud service serve as a case study
> for the oVirt project
I think that's up to the board to decide so no opinion here.
> I did discuss with Stéphane Vincent, their representative, that we
> might want to host some services elsewhere - we have previously
> talked about hosting the website on OpenShift. I've asked him (and
> am waiting for clarification) on whether that might affect their
> offer.
I would like this cleared up. Suppose we get another hosting offer we
still want the freedom to move some services.
> In the meantime, I would like the opinions of the infra team - does
> this offer satisfy our needs and requirements for Jenkins? If that's
> the case, I would like to ask the board if they approve of the offer
> and the request to recognise Alter Way as a sponsor of the project?
I think that as long as it's better than our current EC2 we should do
it. Let's look at the factors:
- Price
Looks like an easy win here.
- Performance
Hard to say without testing, but it would be very unexpected if a
machine with the listed specs would perform less than EC2.
- Availability
Again hard to say without experience, but given they're a hosting
company it would suprise me.
All in all I'd welcome this offer.
More information about the Infra
mailing list