new ovirt-engine instance alive on alterway02.ovirt.org

[Alexander Rydekull]

I vote for <non_descriptive_name_of_function> as a hostname, first of all.

But to keep with the theme of what we have, I vote for engine01 or
manager01 or whatever.


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden <
ewoud+ovirt at kohlvanwijngaarden.nl> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:05:07AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > I'm guessing we'd want to give the instance a proper fqdn ->
> > "manager01.ovirt.org", "engine.ovirt.org" ?
>
> I dislike those options. manager01 (to me) implies a cluster where each
> managerXX is a node. engine implies there is only one which won't be
> true since we'll set up another engine at rackspace. I'd prefer to have
> one, but as far as I know this is currently not possible (and maybe due
> to latency even a bad idea).
>
> How about engine.alterway.ovirt.org, engine-alterway.ovirt.org or
> alterway-engine.ovirt.org?
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>



-- 
/Alexander Rydekull
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20130403/0793ea8c/attachment.html>