libvirt or ovirt

[Fabian Deutsch]

Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2013, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Dave Neary:
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/12/2013 12:18 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> > Benefits of ovirt:
> > - Eating our own dogfood
> > - Scales beter when we want to have multiple nodes / HA features
> > - Has an extensive API
> 
> I'm in favour of using oVirt. One of the things that I liked about 
> AlterWay's offer was the idea of running oVirt project infrastructure on 
> oVirt managed VMs.
> 
> There are two choices inside the oVirt decision: do we want a separate 
> oVirt manager, or are we happy having the host managed as a node in 
> AlterWay's oVirt managed infrastructure? I personally am fine with using 
> AlterWay's management console for the VMs and the host.

Using AlterWay's management console is a charming idea.

- fabian

> > So libvirt would be a better choice if we want to set up fast, but may
> > limit us in the longer run. Also may use fewer resources, but in the
> > long run ovirt may allows us to build a bit of monitoring on top of the
> > API.
> 
> Using AlterWay's oVirt set-up negates the argument about it being longer 
> to set up too - everything is ready to go right now.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20130212/6f158589/attachment.sig>