About gerrit backups and space on resources.ovirt.org
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Tue Jul 23 17:22:05 UTC 2013
On 07/23/2013 07:34 AM, Alexander Rydekull wrote:
> 16:30:02 < dcaro> itamar: yes, but we have tem duplicated in linode01,
> under gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup(deflated) and
> gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup(compressed)
> 16:30:23 < itamar> i don't see a reason to keep this deflated (ping kwade
> on this - he set it up iirc)
> 16:30:24 < dcaro> those are directory names under /home/gerrit-backup
> 16:30:33 < Rydekull> yeah, that's what we thought
> 16:30:44 < Rydekull> so, let's check with quaid and then act accordingly
>
> All the roads lead to quaid.
>
> All kidding aside, quaid, do we have any good reason to have it deflated?
> Or can we remove that?
> All in all, is there a difference on the backups in
> gerrit.ovirt.org-gerrit2-home-backup compared with
> gerrit.ovirt.org-src-backup?
Heh, I didn't know we had an uncompressed backup going there too. It was
something we set up on the fly way-back-when, and I haven't messed with
it. If we have a safe compressed backup, let's blow away the
uncompressed backup. Let me know when I can return the space to Linode.
- Karsten
--
Karsten 'quaid' Wade
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org .^\ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 255 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20130723/2cc98122/attachment.sig>
More information about the Infra
mailing list