please create new repository ovirt-engine-sdk-ruby

Michael Pasternak mpastern at redhat.com
Thu Mar 14 13:48:39 UTC 2013


On 03/14/2013 03:44 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have.
>>> will give a few days to see if any special comments from others.
>>
>> Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under the sdk repo that already exists.  IOW, have a single sdk srpm the generates ruby, java, python, etc bindings?
> 
> this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains
> python bindings, not sure if someone seeking for
> the python sources need to get java/ruby/etc, as well.
> 
> having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc bindings,
> not related to physical bindings repositories i guess,
> 
> the question is do we want to have different bindings under same
> place, - this is not that common afaik.

actually now when i'm thinking about this, gerrit works peer git repo/project,
so sending different sources to the single repo ovirt-engine-sdk will be confusing,
i.e people that would like to 'watch' sdk-java changes would not be able to differentiate
them from the sdk-python/ruby/etc commits.

> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Infra mailing list
>>> Infra at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
> 
> 


-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D



More information about the Infra mailing list