please create new repository ovirt-engine-sdk-ruby

Mike Burns mburns at redhat.com
Thu Mar 14 13:44:53 UTC 2013


On 03/14/2013 09:44 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 03:32 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On 03/14/2013 03:35 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2013 08:14 AM, Michael Pasternak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 from me as part of the sdk subproject we have. will give a few
>>> days to see if any special comments from others.
>>
>> Not a nack, but I'm curious if this could all be contained under
>> the sdk repo that already exists.  IOW, have a single sdk srpm the
>> generates ruby, java, python, etc bindings?
>
> this is another alternative, but current sdk repo contains python
> bindings, not sure if someone seeking for the python sources need to
> get java/ruby/etc, as well.
>
> having single sdk rpm that installs ruby, java, python, etc
> bindings, not related to physical bindings repositories i guess,
>
> the question is do we want to have different bindings under same
> place, - this is not that common afaik.

Not a single rpm, a single srpm with multiple subpackages for -python 
-java, -ruby.

I had looked at libvirt, and they ship python bindings from the libvirt 
srpm.  Further looks shows a number of other packages like ocaml-libvirt 
that aren't.  Seems like it could go either way.

/me doesn't object either way.

Mike

>
>>> _______________________________________________ Infra mailing
>>> list Infra at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
>
>




More information about the Infra mailing list