Puppet environment name / branch name

[David Caro]

On Thu 21 Nov 2013 03:03:00 PM CET, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 03:29 PM, Ohad Basan wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <ewoud+ovirt at kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
>>> To: infra at ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:27:39 PM
>>> Subject: Puppet environment name / branch name
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just deployed r10k to be the deployment method and it works generally
>>> well. One problem is that it maps branches one to one. Currently I
>>> worked around this by making a symlink, but I think we should rename our
>>> master branch to production. Opinions?
>
> is that common? usually master is named master.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Maybe it's better to change puppet config to use master as the 
'production' environment source of manifests. I say that because it's 
usually a mess to have a branch that it's not the master as master... 
(@work we use development as master in one of the repos, and I always 
submit a patch or two a month to master instead xd)

--
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D

Email: dcaro at redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/infra/attachments/20131121/a2a0d6c5/attachment.sig>