Puppet environment name / branch name

[Itamar Heim]

On 11/21/2013 04:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
> On Thu 21 Nov 2013 03:03:00 PM CET, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 11/21/2013 03:29 PM, Ohad Basan wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden" <ewoud+ovirt at kohlvanwijngaarden.nl>
>>>> To: infra at ovirt.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:27:39 PM
>>>> Subject: Puppet environment name / branch name
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I just deployed r10k to be the deployment method and it works generally
>>>> well. One problem is that it maps branches one to one. Currently I
>>>> worked around this by making a symlink, but I think we should rename our
>>>> master branch to production. Opinions?
>>
>> is that common? usually master is named master.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Infra mailing list
>> Infra at ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>
> Maybe it's better to change puppet config to use master as the
> 'production' environment source of manifests. I say that because it's
> usually a mess to have a branch that it's not the master as master...
> (@work we use development as master in one of the repos, and I always
> submit a patch or two a month to master instead xd)

well, one other though is that if you ever intend to have more than a 
single branch, master is usually not the stable production one...