rebasing for oVirt 3.3.1?

Mike Burns mburns at redhat.com
Mon Sep 9 13:31:03 UTC 2013


On 09/09/2013 09:28 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 04:19 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 08:17 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> with 3.3.0 coming soon, one of the questions I heard is "what about
>>> 3.3.1" considering the number of patches fox bugs that went into master
>>> branch since since we branched to stabilize 3.3.0.
>>> i.e., most of the work in master branch has been focused on bug fixes)
>>>
>>> so my suggestion is for 3.3.1 that we rebase from master, then move to
>>> backporting patches to that branch for the rest of 3.3 time frame.
>>>
>>> while this poses a small risk, i believe its the best course forward to
>>> making ovirt 3.3 a more robust and stable version going forward.
>>>
>>> this is mostly about ovirt-engine, and probably vdsm. for the other
>>> projects, its up to the maintainer, based on risk/benefit.
>>>
>>
>> I have no objections as long as we're not taking features into the 3.3.1
>> release and we're not changing the package set.  We had an issue with
>> one of the 3.2.x updates where we pulled a change in vdsm that removed
>> the vdsm-gluster package.  As long as we're making every effort to avoid
>> features and avoid packaging changes, then I'm happy.
>
> i think there is a feature or two, but i think the version would still
> be way better off with this, considering the ratio of patches that went
> into it.

Ok, can we at least make sure we call them out so we can list them in 
announcement email?

>
> I do expect us to do a bit more testing on it than if we didn't rebase,
> but i think its worth it.
>
> (as a side note, i also think it will be worth while to release
> hosted-engine in async to beta testing / release).

Yes, hosted-engine is something we had discussed as an async feature and 
there were no objections to it going async.

Mike

>
>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>     Itamar
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Arch mailing list
>>> Arch at ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra at ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra




More information about the Infra mailing list